DWQA Questions › Tag: medical science
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A review article shows little or no benefit of supplementing patients with vitamin D3 for bone fractures (T. Gatt, A. Grech, and H. Arshad. The effect of Vitamin D supplementation for bone healing in fracture patients: a systematic review. Adv. Orthopedics Volume 2023, Article ID 6236045). However, the supplement doses of vitamin D3 were either low, 800-2000 IU daily, or quite high loading doses orally or systemically of 100,000 to 300,000 IU. Was their negative assessment justified or were the studies flawed? Would taking a 5000 to 10,000 IU dose of vitamin D3 daily, give significant benefit for healing bone fractures?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
52 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “In a recent channeling Creator has said that the divine can’t take viruses directly out of us because that would essentially amount to killing them, but that we can use physical measures such as antiviral supplements to get rid of viruses ourselves without accumulating karma from doing so. On the other hand, we have been told and know that Creator regularly removes viruses from food or beverages to be ingested if we use the daily prayers. I would like to understand why it seems to be possible for you to remove viruses from our food directly but not from our bodies? Isn’t it essentially the same as killing the viruses when removed from our food? What’s the difference? Is it because, in the case of food, the viruses haven’t come into contact with the consciousness of a host body yet and can therefore be removed more easily? Is it because they can be removed from food without killing them or something else entirely?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
52 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “It was a bit disappointing to find out that remote healing via the LHP seems to be rather limited when it comes to removing viruses directly. Creator has stated that more than 85% of all chronic illnesses are viral in origin, so that seems to be quite a limitation for what remote healing is able to achieve if one of the main culprits that is responsible for most illnesses seems to be off-limits, at least in a direct and immediate sense. The fact that we can take measures into our own hands and use antiviral supplements or other physical methods to free ourselves from these viruses is all well and good but there are still massive limits in place that will hinder our progress. What about our other lives, for example?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
48 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “So we may have been lucky enough to find out the truth about viruses and what to do against them in this life, thanks to Karl’s brilliant work, but what good is it if it comes to our many other lives where we don’t possess this knowledge, let alone the means to do anything about it? To me this seems like a rather big hole in the healing equation that needs to be addressed somehow. Is there any kind of “loophole” by which we could achieve more in this regard?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
45 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Could we, for example, ask via the LHP that whenever we take an antiviral supplement, for all the benefits it brings to be automatically applied to our other lives as well? Could we, by doing so, authorize the divine to do more for us through this and help to remove viruses more aggressively? Could we perhaps even ask for the same benefits to be applied to all other humans or beings in general whenever we take an antiviral supplement ourselves or apply another physical method that allows for more direct removal of viruses from our bodies? Or is there perhaps another method by which this could be achieved?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
49 views0 answers0 votes
There is a description circulating on the Internet claiming that the polio epidemic was misinformation based on assuming the polio virus was causing paralysis when it was actually a dangerous upsurge in spraying DDT indiscriminately, which is neurotoxic. What is the divine truth here?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
344 views0 answers0 votes
A recent post in Neuroscience News highlighted a new study that reveals a possible link between common herpesvirus infections and the early biological changes that precede dementia. “The strongest viral associations were seen for Epstein-Barr virus and HHV6 (human herpesvirus 6)…These findings support the hypothesis that chronic viral infections may accelerate neurodegeneration and raise dementia risk independently of genetic factors.” (“Human herpes viruses are associated with steeper age-dependent increases of serum biomarkers for dementia in cognitively unimpaired women” by Lisa M. James et al. Scientific Reports). Is this a valid clue supporting the viral causation of dementia?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
259 views0 answers0 votes
Arguably, the biggest champion over the years for cancer as a metabolic disease and largely ignored by medical opinion leaders, has been Dr. Thomas Seyfried who has promoted ketogenic diets as an adjunct to conventional treatment. A state of ketosis lowers blood sugar which tumor cells need, and elevates ketone bodies which normal cells can use for energy but tumor cells can’t. But even he seems blind to the clues about viral causation. In a 2014 study in Cancer Letters, he augments his theory of the central role of metabolism in glioblastoma in describing how 90% of brain tumor cells are infected by cytomegalovirus, “which is a supercharger for allowing tumor cells to use glucose and glutamine.” That biochemical pathway allows energy for tumors to grow despite inadequate oxygenation. But he doesn’t ask, why are viruses there to begin with and what other role might they play? Is this an example of mind control suppression to limit scientific progress?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
164 views0 answers0 votes
Worldwide, the incidence of cancer in people younger than 50 rose by 79% and cancer-related deaths rose by 28%, from 1990 to 2019 as reported in the medical journal BMJ Oncology. The numbers are increasing for 17 types of cancer, so this is a broad trend. Why is this happening, despite public awareness of health risks and increased vigilance?
ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • 
189 views0 answers0 votes
The trial to assess chelation therapy 2 (TACT2) on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes and a prior myocardial infarction (MI) was reported in September, 2024. While there was a significant reduction in circulating heavy metals following months of weekly intravenous EDTA infusions, there was not a significant reduction in cardiovascular events or mortality. You told us previously that EDTA therapy was actually beneficial, as the first TACT study showed, but that the interlopers were suppressing beneficial clinical data. Is that the reason for the failed confirmation with the TACT2 follow-up?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
334 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Is Mirror Life Microbe research an interloper technology existing within their own societies or is this directed at humans only (as so many other things)?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
254 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Seasilver was a supplement containing the herb pau d’arco, cranberry, and aloe. It got a lot of fanfare back in the late 90s and early 2000s. It was run out of business by the FTC and fined $120 million. They ceased doing business in 2006. Was this an ‘honest’ product being sold for its genuine health benefits? Or a scam? Or was it a good product whose benefits were exaggerated intentionally, with awareness, or unintentionally? Did they legitimately run afoul of the FDA and FTC, or were they targeted by overzealous enforcement, reading ‘too much’ into the laws and regulations governing supplements? Who are the bad guys here and who are the good guys, or were they both breaking and bending the rules of ‘fair play?'” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 12 months ago • 
209 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Did this constitute an interloper backlash of the manufacturers and sellers of this Seasilver product? Is this an object lesson we should be mindful of?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 12 months ago • 
216 views0 answers0 votes
You clarified that Vitamin D levels of 40 to 60 ng/mL are important for healthy well-being, but not specifically how important this vitamin is for the recommended Antiviral Regimen to be effective. What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 12 months ago • 
246 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Is the efficacy of Creator’s antivirals affected by a person’s vitamin D levels? A recent research paper, ‘Vitamin D: A key player in COVID-19 immunity and lessons from the pandemic to combat immune-evasive variants,’ suggests all viral infections are more effectively treated when patients have vitamin D levels between 30-60ng/mL. In 2011, the Endocrine Society urged that: ‘to guarantee sufficiency, we recommend between 40 and 60 ng/mL for both children and adults.'” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 12 months ago • 
187 views0 answers0 votes
12Next »
Ask Question