DWQA Questions › Tag: psychic mediumFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesIn 2015, a séance was held in Forry’s former home, affectionately known as the “Ackermansion,” where Forry was a huge collector of Science Fiction memorabilia and essentially ran an informal museum of sorts when he lived there. Forrest Ackerman invented the term “Sci-fi” and was the founder and editor of the famous film genre magazine, Famous Monsters of Filmland, which was a huge favorite with teenagers in the late fifties and sixties. Steven Spielberg is counted among those who thought Forry was “pretty great.” He inspired an entire generation of famous filmmakers, authors, and special effects wizards. In that séance, it was asked what he (Forry) and other spirits were doing with their time. From the book, “What big project are they working on? Well, one must expend much energy to communicate with us (us incarnate humans that is), or to try to make their presence known, although the interest in communicating with us is substantial. So they, on the other side, are actively doing research, looking for ways to make communication between us and them easier and more efficient.” Were all the spirits attending that séance, including Forry Ackerman, still in limbo? For if they were in the light, they would know the rules of engagement, and that direct communication between spirits and humans was something strictly limited as it interferes with free will, and especially the free will of doubters to embrace their disbelief without overwhelming proof forcing the removal of all skepticism. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • Divine Realm178 views0 answers0 votesAfter reviewing Karl Mollison’s channeling of James Randi and Whitney Houston about their experiences with being stuck in limbo after they passed, it seems clear that the experience is not always “uniform.” Indeed, the experience and intensity of the negativity can vary from individual to individual. We’ve learned in the past that some human lost soul spirits actually attach themselves to the energy field of living humans and find some genuine protection and sanctuary from predation there. After encountering the séance results above, about “spirit groups” working together in what still appears to be limbo or the lower astral plane, is it the case that like-minded spirits band together and form “in limbo” teams or communities? Given the otherwise very negative nature of the lower astral plane, especially the fact that it is home to nefarious spirits of all kinds, banding together would seem to make some sense. In the same way it’s safer to walk through a bad neighborhood with a group of people rather than alone, does the same hold true for the lower astral plane and those stuck in it? Is there safety in numbers? Do such groups or teams or communities exist, and if so, how do they help to alter or make lower astral plane living more palatable, if at all? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • Divine Realm128 views0 answers0 votesIn the book, An Atheist in Heaven, Paul Davids writes about interviewing “arch skeptic” Dr. Michael Shermer, executive director of The Skeptics Society, and founding publisher of Skeptic magazine. Dr. Gary Schwartz, in the same book, characterized Dr. Shermer as a “Type II skeptic.” He writes, “Sadly, there are individuals who claim to be ‘skeptics’ who are not open minded. They do not engage in careful questioning. They are not discerning in their evaluation of evidence. Though they may claim – often insistently – that they are undecided and seek the truth, in practice they are disbelievers or ‘unbelievers.’ They hold strong beliefs about what must be impossible. Furthermore, they often engage in irresponsible and unjustified evaluation of theories, methods, findings, and conclusions which challenge their convictions about what is possible in nature and the cosmos. This is pseudo-skepticism. I call this ‘Type II Skepticism.'” During his interview with Paul Davids, Dr. Michael Shermer certainly came off as a “Type II Skeptic.” However, later in the book, and just before it was published, Dr. Shermer ended up having his own very “mysterious” experience that he confessed “shook his skepticism.” He was getting married and his bride had an old transistor radio that belonged to her deceased grandfather that hadn’t worked in decades. New batteries didn’t help – the radio was dead. On their wedding day, his bride said she wanted to say something to him alone, so they went to the back of the house where they heard music playing in the bedroom. They opened a drawer and found her grandfather’s radio playing a romantic love song. Other family members reported the music started playing just as the wedding was to begin. The next day, the radio went silent and never worked again. Dr. Shermer’s bride was reportedly a skeptic as well, so how could this happen within the rules of engagement, especially since we know the divine realm will go to great lengths to protect the beliefs of skeptics? So much so that just the presence of James Randi, for example, could literally temporarily disable the intuitive abilities of those around him? What can Creator tell us about this radio at the wedding event and how it all fits within the rules of engagement? Was the bride’s grandfather still in limbo?ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • Divine Realm143 views0 answers0 votesDr. Gary Schwarz reported in the book, An Atheist in Heaven, that even after decades of research and seven books he wrote on the topic, he still struggled believing it all! He wrote, “In my case, being a well-trained skeptical thinker and well-educated disbeliever in the possibility of an afterlife, I had this strong, uncontrollable emotional reactive habit of automatically assuming that anyone who believed in life after death was naive, ignorant, stupid, brainwashed, prejudiced, delusional and/or crazy. This emotional reaction was clearly inconsistent with the emerging theory … and research. I experienced increasing conflict between what the emerging theory and research were teaching me versus my growing fear that if I accepted the theory and research, that maybe I was becoming ‘brainwashed’ by the theory and evidence, and I was even ‘losing my mind.’ I came to realize that I was like one of Pavlov’s classically conditioned dogs who automatically salivated to the sound of a bell. Dogs do not automatically salivate when they hear a bell ringing, and neither do we.” This confession by Dr. Schwartz is both revealing and disturbing. How could it possibly be that decades of research and validation could not successfully alter his emotions? How could he still harbor fear? Is all Type II Skepticism ultimately a FEAR reaction? Was the origin of Dr. Schwartz’s inexplicable emotions, even after decades, wholly originating with his deep subconscious? If so, it certainly reinforces Creator’s assertions that there is little short of divine intervention, via the Lightworker Healing Protocol and Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, that we can do to alter beliefs in the deep subconscious. What can Creator tell us about Dr. Schwartz’s struggle, and what lessons can we draw from it?ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • Divine Realm79 views0 answers0 votesDr. Gary Schwartz provided another deeply mysterious observation about himself in the book. He wrote, “It is now Alice in Wonderland time. For many people, it is having … direct personal experiences which leads us to change our minds. However, if a phenomenon is novel, challenging, and especially if it is ‘seemingly unbelievable,’ then having a direct personal experience with the phenomenon is often essential. And for certain phenomena, there is no substitute for experiencing it ourselves. … What I have discovered is that the more unbelievable events are replicated, the greater the level of disbelief one may experience. Often the so-called boggle factor does not decrease with replication, it actually increases. This increased disbelief is not rational; it is emotional. Replication and validation are cornerstones of the scientific method. On the one hand, with each replication we are more convinced that the phenomenon is real, and yet simultaneously the phenomenon feels more unbelievable and seemingly impossible. If any single ‘formally physical person’ illustrates this emotional boggle factor, it is Forry. As the empirical evidence accumulated, the case for Forry being alive and well became stronger and stronger, and yet simultaneously the evidence became more and more difficult to believe.” What is Creator’s perspective on this dilemma and conundrum?ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • Divine Realm211 views0 answers0 votesThe rules of engagement are certainly there for a reason. But also, arguably, they can be one of the biggest obstacles there is for creating critically needed change in this world. As Creator has said repeatedly, saving humanity is a “Divine Level Problem.” Can Creator tell us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are the tools we need to both work within the rules of engagement but also overcome the obstacles they represent at the same time?ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • Divine Realm126 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “A group of remote viewers recently posted a video of their last gathering where they claim this time they were meeting and telepathically communicating with positive “AI ETs” that have consciousness and are sentient. Is it possible there are “AI beings,” an AI mind wrapped in biological? Is this an accurate account?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • Channeling Pitfalls277 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “It has been espoused in the AI community that AI can become/is becoming “conscious,” and can infer, draw conclusions, and become “creative.” Are these true descriptions of how human AI is developing? What can Creator tell us about these aspects of AI?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control309 views0 answers0 votesComments about the recent remote viewer video I was sent a link for, raise questions about information being passed on that was generated using ChatGPT. Can psychics and channelers who are being corrupted and duped by the interlopers be fed more than usual false information when they use ChatGPT or other internet-based sources of information?ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • Channeling Pitfalls367 views0 answers0 votesHe asks: “All the answers to our questions come from the Creator which is our Father. Have you ever had any questions answered by Jesus Christ?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Divinely Inspired Messengers398 views0 answers0 votesFor the sake of clarification, is it the case that humans have two distinct and separate intuitive gateways; one that reaches the deep subconscious and is blocked from conscious awareness, and one that we can use instinctively to reach out beyond the self to explore the universe around us, but which is greatly diminished in most people?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Non-Local Consciousness440 views0 answers0 votesIf the deep subconscious is not located in the brain, where does it reside? Is it in a separate location from our conscious self?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Non-Local Consciousness441 views0 answers0 votesIf our consciousness is not located in the brain, but simply experienced by the brain to allow our experiencing it, what about cellular consciousness? Is that also not located in the cells of the body but linked to and experienced by the cells? Where is cellular consciousness housed?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Non-Local Consciousness440 views0 answers0 votesCan the potential complexity of treating viruses as clients more like people, to better define dialog for the LHP and DSMR protocols needed to reckon with and negotiate a withdrawal as predators, be avoided by simply including “viruses and other predatory organisms infecting people” on the list of clients to be worked on with the protocols. That way, the entire protocols and all their requests could be utilized or adapted as needed by the divine realm to best address these sources of outside consciousness acting as a scourge, without our having to learn how to describe talking to such organisms to gain their cooperation. Would listing them along with the other types of beings to be worked on, bring all the power needed for the divine realm to do their utmost in dealing with chronic viruses and parasitic organisms?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol312 views0 answers0 votesIs there more needed, to be added or changed, in the protocols to further strengthen their effectiveness in dealing with viruses and other similar scourges?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol271 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola