DWQA Questions › Tag: sabotage
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A viewer asks: “High blood pressure is conventionally regarded as a health risk and that lowering it reduces risk, especially in moderate-to-severe systolic BP of 140-159 mmHg. Dr. Malcolm Kendrick author of Doctoring Data claims that cardiovascular risk increases more steeply after systolic BP reaches around 160-170 mmHg—well beyond the 140/90 threshold often used to diagnose and treat hypertension. A rule of thumb in medicine is that for older individuals, a systolic BP of around 100 + age is a reasonable upper limit beyond which cardiovascular risks increase significantly. Is hypertension over-treated, given that aggressively lowering blood pressure—especially in older individuals—can be harmful?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
72 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “A 2018 book, Medical Nihilism, by Jacob Stegenga claims the healthcare system over-adopts treatments and under-recognizes risks. He states confidence in the effectiveness of medical interventions should be low because empirical evidence for the efficacy of many treatments is weak due to methodological flaws, publication bias, the influence of commercial interests. He claims positive studies are more likely to be published, screening programs tend to detect and treat cancers that would never cause harm, common treatments can cause long-term complications, short trial durations miss long-term harms etc. How accurate is his view that evidence is systematically skewed and harms are undercounted?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
56 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Dr. Bernard Lown, a Harvard cardiologist in the 1980s, criticized the rapid rise of surgical Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts (CABG), noting 20–40% were potentially avoidable, especially in stable angina, and many patients had uncertain survival benefit. He advocated medical therapy—nitrates, beta-blockers, lifestyle changes—for symptom control. How accurate is it to say that in 2026, evidence-based guidelines and trials have reduced avoidable CABG to <10% for high-risk, guideline-selected patients, and that for low-risk, stable patients, surgery rarely improves survival, and that beta-blockers, nitrates, ACE inhibitors, lifestyle changes are to be preferred?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
48 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “A 2012 paper in the British Medical Journal “Use of relative and absolute effect measures in reporting health inequalities” concluded that “75% (258/344) [of 2009 papers] reported only relative effect measures.” Absolute risk reduction is often far less impressive and less often stated. This suggests that physicians will overestimate the efficacy of treatments and patients may have a misplaced belief in both effectiveness and risks. To what extent does this practice mislead patients and clinicians and benefit pharmaceutical manufacturers?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
40 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Dr. Malcolm Kendrick in his book, Doctoring Data, suggests more patients are harmed by over-treatment than helped. He claims published treatment benefits are often exaggerated by hiding behind relative risk (to mask how tiny most benefits are), selective reporting (such as statistical significance without meaningful benefit), or clever framing (such as natural variation in cholesterol or blood pressure) is medicalized as a treatable condition. To what extent is published medical research actually the fabricated appearance of scientific rigor to sell a product?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
51 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “What percentage of patients take drugs for almost no real benefit, even while risking side effects and penalized by the cost?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
53 views0 answers0 votes
Creator recently channeled that the greatest karmic rewards come to those who take on the greatest challenges. You wouldn’t think that playing football for the Detroit Lions would amount to much of a karmic challenge, but since we have learned that they have been a targeted group since 1958, and Detroit is a targeted city due to Detroit’s prominent role in helping the Allies win World War II, it turns out that anyone playing for and coaching for the Detroit Lions was putting themselves squarely in harm’s way. Detroit developed a pernicious and persistent losing culture. Like many karmic dilemmas, it seemed the situation just got worse with time. Negative karma has a tendency to compound, to spiral downward, and eventually reach a point where the entity trapped in the dilemma is no longer in a position to save themselves. Was this truly the situation with the Lions organization prior to a campaign being launched to heal them using the Lightworker Healing Protocol? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
441 views0 answers0 votes
Lightworker Healing Protocol sessions being done for the Detroit Lions were aimed at providing protection from targeting and manipulation. This is a complex request because the free will choices of the interlopers doing the targeting still needed some allowance for expression within the divine rules of engagement. The request was never, “Creator, help the Lions win.” It was soon noticed that the frequency and severity of injuries did, in fact, seem to decline. But something else also seemed to happen, the team dramatically improved its play and started winning. But the improvement seemed way out of proportion in contrast to the requests for protection from harm. When asked about it, Creator said it was a backlog of compensatory karma coming to bear after decades of targeting. Yet, it seems that this compensatory karma could not be brought to bear until the healing campaign was launched. Can Creator explain how compensatory karma can be held at bay by the pernicious downward spiral of negative karma?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
432 views0 answers0 votes
When putting these questions together, a pundit on a podcast playing in the background commented, “This might be the most dramatic turnaround in NFL history.” The Lions are now favored by Las Vegas oddsmakers to win the Super Bowl. That is actually shocking to a lot of fans and observers. Many have commented that to the extent the Lions were once cursed, they are now blessed. Where previously everything was destined to go wrong, now they are destined to not only go right but brilliantly so. The Lions, in just the last three years, have not only drafted good players but arguably numerous future Hall of Fame players. Many have commented they appear to be a “TEAM OF DESTINY.” In a world increasingly secular, the very concept of someone or some group as having a destiny implies something nonrandom and spiritual in origin. A “HAND OF DESTINY” guiding the fortunes. It would be interesting to know how many reputed atheists still believe in destiny. What can Creator tell us about the concept and reality of destiny?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
449 views0 answers0 votes
Critics of the notion of having a genuine destiny would simply point out the apparent randomness of life events. But to say this argument is weak is a massive understatement. What is the interloper position on destiny? Do they reject it entirely and think humans are immensely silly for entertaining the very notion? Don’t the interlopers in saner moments ever recognize that randomness is actually an exceptionally poor explanation for something like the Lions’ abrupt turnaround, even as they continue the targeting against the Lions? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
510 views0 answers0 votes
What came first, the chicken or the egg? It seems pretty clear that a Lightworker Healing Protocol campaign was needed to stop the karmic tailspin the Lions were in. Was the LHP campaign itself a karmic response? In other words, did karma itself play a role in bringing about the healing campaign? Or was the healing campaign a divine response and not of karmic origin per se? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
407 views0 answers0 votes
In the study of warfare, it is asserted that most battles are won or lost before the first shot is fired. In other words, planning and anticipating all the needs of an army in battle will ensure victory far more than whatever actually happens on the battlefield spontaneously. Taking on a spiraling karmic dilemma aggravated by active targeting done by invisible interlopers seems a truly daunting problem to solve. In order to take this on, it seems like a lot of planning and preparation back in the light was needed. Was this planning and preparation, again, itself a karmic response, or was it a divine response to a karmic dilemma that was no longer manageable by the participants in the physical? Again, does karma itself engineer the solutions, or does the divine, or is there interplay? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
404 views0 answers0 votes
Does karma negotiate solutions with the divine? What’s involved in unlocking compensatory karma? So many of us are unwitting participants in the karmic drama in the physical, but back in the light, were we witting participants, at least in terms of planning and preparation? Does karma simply control the flow of energy like water follows gravity, but not to the extent of creating an aqueduct, so it’s not up to water and gravity to build the aqueducts, but up to us through trial and error? Is that a useful analogy at all? Does karma do its own thing until we intervene in a committed way? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
420 views0 answers0 votes
Is karma an ensouled entity or more like Divine Artificial Intelligence? When we think of AI, we think of a kind of predictable intelligence without emotion. Does that describe the consciousness of karma itself? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
431 views0 answers0 votes
People think of karma as “good and bad,” when Creator used the term “compensatory.” Creator has emphasized more than once that football itself is a nondivine activity that arguably does more collective harm and damage to the human soul and spirit than good. Yet, within the world of football and football players and coaches and fans, there are endless karmic dramas and pursuits that can be profound learning and skill-building opportunities. And within that context there is negative karma brought about by pain and trauma, and positive karma brought about by passionate commitment, the bringing of joy to many, and gratitude. When the negative is artificially focused and concentrated via targeting by the interlopers, bringing about the opposite is not necessarily good, but it is compensatory despite the overall context of football remaining problematic in the eyes of the divine. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
431 views0 answers0 votes
123…5Next »
Ask Question