DWQA Questions › Tag: scientific community
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
There is a description circulating on the Internet claiming that the polio epidemic was misinformation based on assuming the polio virus was causing paralysis when it was actually a dangerous upsurge in spraying DDT indiscriminately, which is neurotoxic. What is the divine truth here?
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
88 views0 answers0 votes
A number of research studies have been called into question because of poor reproducibility when an attempt to replicate their findings failed. A “replication crisis” has been noted for psychology, sociology, education, economics, and medical research. For example, a detailed inquiry was mounted to replicate 193 experiments from 53 top cancer papers published from 2010-2012. Only a quarter of the original findings were able to be reproduced. Moreover, even for effects that were reproduced, the magnitude averaged 85% less than observed in the original investigations. This is concerning because such experiments are crucial for deciding what to pursue for drug development and when to proceed to clinical trials. Unreliable results not only waste money but expose patients to unnecessary risks. While there are many understandable reasons why results can vary, what can Creator tell us about hidden reasons for such poor reproducibility and their impact on the reliability of scientific inquiry?
ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • 
21 views0 answers0 votes
A recent post in Neuroscience News highlighted a new study that reveals a possible link between common herpesvirus infections and the early biological changes that precede dementia. “The strongest viral associations were seen for Epstein-Barr virus and HHV6 (human herpesvirus 6)…These findings support the hypothesis that chronic viral infections may accelerate neurodegeneration and raise dementia risk independently of genetic factors.” (“Human herpes viruses are associated with steeper age-dependent increases of serum biomarkers for dementia in cognitively unimpaired women” by Lisa M. James et al. Scientific Reports). Is this a valid clue supporting the viral causation of dementia?
ClosedNicola asked 6 days ago • 
59 views0 answers0 votes
Arguably, the biggest champion over the years for cancer as a metabolic disease and largely ignored by medical opinion leaders, has been Dr. Thomas Seyfried who has promoted ketogenic diets as an adjunct to conventional treatment. A state of ketosis lowers blood sugar which tumor cells need, and elevates ketone bodies which normal cells can use for energy but tumor cells can’t. But even he seems blind to the clues about viral causation. In a 2014 study in Cancer Letters, he augments his theory of the central role of metabolism in glioblastoma in describing how 90% of brain tumor cells are infected by cytomegalovirus, “which is a supercharger for allowing tumor cells to use glucose and glutamine.” That biochemical pathway allows energy for tumors to grow despite inadequate oxygenation. But he doesn’t ask, why are viruses there to begin with and what other role might they play? Is this an example of mind control suppression to limit scientific progress?
ClosedNicola asked 6 days ago • 
48 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Is the Brilliant Light Power “SunCell” and the “Hydrino Theory” a true discovery of a new energy source to power our electrical grid and more?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
224 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Is the hydrino, the dark matter, and its interactions the source of dark energy that scientists are looking for?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
207 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Is the hydrino source of energy important for our survival and Gaia’s benefit once the interlopers withdraw?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
217 views0 answers0 votes
In 2001, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) launched a trial to lower blood glucose levels in diabetic patients to reduce their risk for heart attack, stroke, or death from cardiovascular disease. The trial, called Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes, or ACCORD, involved over 10,000 Type 2 diabetic patients who had either been previously diagnosed with heart disease or had two or more risk factors for heart disease when they entered the study. Half received standard treatment and half were treated aggressively with higher doses of antidiabetic drugs. The trial was halted 18 months early because of a 26% increase in deaths in the aggressively treated group. The NIH said there was no conclusive link to a particular medication. Were these outcomes just a fluke or was over-medication involved? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
126 views0 answers0 votes
The diabetes drug rosiglitazone, sold under the trade name Avandia, has come under scrutiny. From 1999 to 2009, nearly 50,000 people on Avandia suffered heart attack, stroke, heart failure or death. In Europe, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) recommended in September 2010 that the drug be suspended because the benefits no longer outweighed the risks.[10][11] It was withdrawn from the market in the UK, Spain and India in 2010,[12] and in New Zealand and South Africa in 2011. It is still being prescribed in the U.S. following a review of safety data by the FDA. Is this drug safe to use or are there cardiovascular risks? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
128 views0 answers0 votes
Are clinical studies in less prominent foreign scientific journals more likely to be reliable than what is reported in major U.S. journals, due to less interloper interference with the studies or their interpretation?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
93 views0 answers0 votes
We have seen reviews of supplements express skepticism: “Watch out for supplements that include an extensive list of ingredients to create the illusion of comprehensive support. More is not necessarily better when it comes to your health. Some of the supplements we reviewed contained more than 10 unique ingredients!” What is the divine perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • 
169 views0 answers0 votes
Other reviewers comment that having many ingredients in a supplement may increase safety concerns. What is the divine perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • 
190 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Why don’t our scientific studies give some credence to belief in your own healing?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 12 months ago • 
216 views0 answers0 votes
In Dr. Anthony Fauci’s autobiography, he describes a grilling by Senator Rand Paul as the latter’s misunderstanding that gain of function research on viruses is not the same as “gain of function research of concern,” because only the latter includes potentially dangerous manipulations to increase pathogenicity and transmissibility of infectious viruses. Fauci explained what the U.S. funded in the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) was work on bat viruses that were non-infectious in humans, to simply study their properties. Secondly, he points out that the “molecular makeup of the bat viruses studied at the WIV under the NIAID/EHA grant was genetically so different from SARS-CoV-2 that they could not possibly be the source of SARS-CoV-2.” Is that an accurate description by Fauci and not a minimization or deceptive misstatement of fact?
ClosedNicola asked 12 months ago • 
166 views0 answers0 votes
Was the condemnation and inflammatory attack on Fauci by Senator Rand Paul orchestrated through mind control manipulation by the Extraterrestrial Alliance to provide a false narrative, and was that picked up and reported many times by Fox News commentators without careful review and analysis because of mind control manipulation to create a cover story for appearance of what is actually an extraterrestrial viral creation?
ClosedNicola asked 12 months ago • 
210 views0 answers0 votes
1234Next »
Ask Question