DWQA Questions › Tag: scientific communityFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesFauci criticized Dr. Scott Atlas, a Stanford professor advising the Trump administration, for stating the current public health measures were overkill and recommending the following: 1. “Schools should be fully reopened because COVID was not a serious threat to children and they did not transmit the virus efficiently even if they got infected.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control201 views0 answers0 votesFauci criticized Dr. Scott Atlas, a Stanford professor advising the Trump administration, for stating the current public health measures were overkill and recommending the following: 2. “COVID would run its course no matter what actions were taken.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control187 views0 answers0 votesFauci criticized Dr. Scott Atlas, a Stanford professor advising the Trump administration, for stating the current public health measures were overkill and recommending the following: 3. “Only the symptomatic should be tested.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control173 views0 answers0 votesFauci criticized Dr. Scott Atlas, a Stanford professor advising the Trump administration, for stating the current public health measures were overkill and recommending the following: 4. “It was the vulnerable in nursing homes and other high-risk places who needed protection.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control182 views0 answers0 votesFauci criticized Dr. Scott Atlas, a Stanford professor advising the Trump administration, for stating the current public health measures were overkill and recommending the following: 5. “Masks were overrated and that most people should be allowed to go about their lives normally because public health restrictions were upending the economy and exacting an exorbitant social cost.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control178 views0 answers0 votesOverall, were these views of Dr. Atlas or Dr. Fauci on public health measures promoted by extraterrestrial mind control?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control192 views0 answers0 votesFauci also criticized the similar Great Barrington Declaration, an open letter of October 2020 signed by many epidemiologists and public health professionals, only saying that some of the signatures were later found to be fraudulent. Was that true?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control159 views0 answers0 votesWas the Great Barrington Declaration ginned up by mind control manipulation, perhaps to sow discord in the scientific community? Was Fauci’s dismissal of its perspectives a mind control manipulation?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control162 views0 answers0 votesLooking at the history of the dairy industry, it is clear that the U.S. government was instrumental in promoting milk consumption by children in public schools, universally. Similar actions occurred in the UK, Australia, etc. While there were powerful commercial vested interests in supporting these policies, is there a deeper, sinister influence behind making cow’s milk such a nutritional cornerstone?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions215 views0 answers0 votesThe scientific literature seems mixed in reflecting limited negative health associations with milk consumption. For example, there are studies suggesting an increase in prostate cancer, but not other cancers. Nutritional studies are notoriously complicated and prone to errors of interpretation because of the wide array of foodstuffs that can be positive or negative factors, and the long-term nature of such influences in likely producing a downside. But if milk is a major vector for harmful chronic viruses causing cancer, autoimmune diseases, cardiovascular illness, diabetes, and dementia, among others, why hasn’t this been seen and pursued vigorously by researchers?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions216 views0 answers0 votesThe Irreproducibility Crisis in Modern Science, a study published in 2018 by the National Association of Scholars says, “Many supposedly scientific results cannot be reproduced reliably in subsequent investigations, and offer no trustworthy insight into the way the world works. In 2005, Dr. John Ioannidis argued, shockingly and persuasively, that most published research findings in his own field of medicine were false.” Is this an exaggeration or an accurate perspective? What is going on?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions209 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “High cholesterol is said to be a major risk factor for heart disease. It is said that LDL(bad) cholesterol should be less than 100 mg/dL HDL (good) should be 40 mg/dL or higher for men and 50 mg/dL or higher for women. Triglycerides should be less than 150 mg/dL. Many different types of drinks, including green tea, oat drinks, soy drinks, and plant milk smoothies, contain compounds that may help reduce or manage cholesterol levels. Several studies, for example, have demonstrated the beneficial effects of tomato juice on cholesterol metabolism. How accurate and reliable are these suggested levels of cholesterol, and are the drinks suggested one effective method (among many) to optimize levels?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions220 views0 answers0 votesThere have been a number of revelations in recent years in the scientific literature calling into question the reliability of science. This is because serious inquiries to confirm a number of well-accepted findings have failed to do so, undermining the validity of the original studies. While there are a number of flaws in how science is conducted and reported which could lead to false initial conclusions, you have pointed out that the interlopers have manipulated the outcomes of key scientific studies to either show a false positive or a false negative result. How widespread a problem is this? What percentage of scientific reports are corrupted by the Extraterrestrial Alliance?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions208 views0 answers0 votesThe Russian-speaking cybercriminal gang known as AlphV and Blackcat, claimed responsibility for the cyberattack against Change Healthcare and said on its darkweb site that it exfiltrated 6 TB of data. Observers saw a subsequent 22 million dollar Bitcoin payment to a blockchain ledger associated with that group of hackers, so it appears a ransom was paid. Were they the true culprits? Were the extraterrestrials even involved?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Agenda248 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “My question concerns how fast humans might advance given the opportunities to do so. It seems to me that even if humanity is thrown into a more difficult situation before being given a reprieve from our perpetrators, we still might be able to move forward spiritually in a rapid manner. If given the chance would technologies like nuclear fusion and the ability to see interdimensional life through advanced telescopes that would be super cold… Allow us to have the energy and the new knowledge to understand that the spiritual and/or divine is a scientific reality? Which in turn could change humanity’s focus quite rapidly toward spiritual development, allowing for an ascension event to become a more realistic possibility?”ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Human Potential312 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola