DWQA Questions › Tag: scientific community
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Fauci criticized Dr. Scott Atlas, a Stanford professor advising the Trump administration, for stating the current public health measures were overkill and recommending the following: 5. “Masks were overrated and that most people should be allowed to go about their lives normally because public health restrictions were upending the economy and exacting an exorbitant social cost.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
105 views0 answers0 votes
Overall, were these views of Dr. Atlas or Dr. Fauci on public health measures promoted by extraterrestrial mind control?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
107 views0 answers0 votes
Fauci also criticized the similar Great Barrington Declaration, an open letter of October 2020 signed by many epidemiologists and public health professionals, only saying that some of the signatures were later found to be fraudulent. Was that true?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
94 views0 answers0 votes
Was the Great Barrington Declaration ginned up by mind control manipulation, perhaps to sow discord in the scientific community? Was Fauci’s dismissal of its perspectives a mind control manipulation?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
97 views0 answers0 votes
Looking at the history of the dairy industry, it is clear that the U.S. government was instrumental in promoting milk consumption by children in public schools, universally. Similar actions occurred in the UK, Australia, etc. While there were powerful commercial vested interests in supporting these policies, is there a deeper, sinister influence behind making cow’s milk such a nutritional cornerstone?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
151 views0 answers0 votes
The scientific literature seems mixed in reflecting limited negative health associations with milk consumption. For example, there are studies suggesting an increase in prostate cancer, but not other cancers. Nutritional studies are notoriously complicated and prone to errors of interpretation because of the wide array of foodstuffs that can be positive or negative factors, and the long-term nature of such influences in likely producing a downside. But if milk is a major vector for harmful chronic viruses causing cancer, autoimmune diseases, cardiovascular illness, diabetes, and dementia, among others, why hasn’t this been seen and pursued vigorously by researchers?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
161 views0 answers0 votes
The Irreproducibility Crisis in Modern Science, a study published in 2018 by the National Association of Scholars says, “Many supposedly scientific results cannot be reproduced reliably in subsequent investigations, and offer no trustworthy insight into the way the world works. In 2005, Dr. John Ioannidis argued, shockingly and persuasively, that most published research findings in his own field of medicine were false.” Is this an exaggeration or an accurate perspective? What is going on?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
133 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “High cholesterol is said to be a major risk factor for heart disease. It is said that LDL(bad) cholesterol should be less than 100 mg/dL HDL (good) should be 40 mg/dL or higher for men and 50 mg/dL or higher for women. Triglycerides should be less than 150 mg/dL. Many different types of drinks, including green tea, oat drinks, soy drinks, and plant milk smoothies, contain compounds that may help reduce or manage cholesterol levels. Several studies, for example, have demonstrated the beneficial effects of tomato juice on cholesterol metabolism. How accurate and reliable are these suggested levels of cholesterol, and are the drinks suggested one effective method (among many) to optimize levels?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
151 views0 answers0 votes
There have been a number of revelations in recent years in the scientific literature calling into question the reliability of science. This is because serious inquiries to confirm a number of well-accepted findings have failed to do so, undermining the validity of the original studies. While there are a number of flaws in how science is conducted and reported which could lead to false initial conclusions, you have pointed out that the interlopers have manipulated the outcomes of key scientific studies to either show a false positive or a false negative result. How widespread a problem is this? What percentage of scientific reports are corrupted by the Extraterrestrial Alliance?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
121 views0 answers0 votes
The Russian-speaking cybercriminal gang known as AlphV and Blackcat, claimed responsibility for the cyberattack against Change Healthcare and said on its darkweb site that it exfiltrated 6 TB of data. Observers saw a subsequent 22 million dollar Bitcoin payment to a blockchain ledger associated with that group of hackers, so it appears a ransom was paid. Were they the true culprits? Were the extraterrestrials even involved?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
159 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “My question concerns how fast humans might advance given the opportunities to do so. It seems to me that even if humanity is thrown into a more difficult situation before being given a reprieve from our perpetrators, we still might be able to move forward spiritually in a rapid manner. If given the chance would technologies like nuclear fusion and the ability to see interdimensional life through advanced telescopes that would be super cold… Allow us to have the energy and the new knowledge to understand that the spiritual and/or divine is a scientific reality? Which in turn could change humanity’s focus quite rapidly toward spiritual development, allowing for an ascension event to become a more realistic possibility?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
198 views0 answers0 votes
It was reported in the news that “the U.S. government has arbitrarily decided it will no longer conduct safety research on wireless radiation, abruptly halting the National Toxicology Project… Despite that 10-year, $30M project finding increases in cancer, heart damage and DNA damage from exposure to cell phone RF radiation at common levels.” You have cautioned us for years that these emissions cause cancer. Is this cancellation sinister in its origins to cover up the truth?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
188 views0 answers0 votes
We saw an announcement saying: “Change Healthcare, an affiliate of Optum and UnitedHealthcare, experienced a cyberattack last week. This is significant because Change operates the nation’s largest medical electronic data interchange (or EDI), a network that allows for the transmission of claims data back and forth between insurance companies and hospitals, pharmacies, doctors’ offices and other healthcare providers seeking payment for their services. Among the types of transactions processed daily through Change are patient eligibility verification, clinical pre-authorizations, claims submissions, and payments to providers for services rendered. Change is a vital link between providers and insurers, processing more than 15 billion healthcare transactions annually. In 2022, the U.S. Department of Justice noted that over 50% of all U.S. medical claims pass through or touch Change’s EDI clearinghouse, and we suspect that number has only increased since then.” Is this just a human malicious attack, or is it related to the plan of the interlopers to weaken us by disrupting our technology?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
152 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Is having the scientific community recognize consciousness as the missing link for a unified theory a determining factor in accelerating the healing acceptance en masse, for society at large? Given what we have come to learn about consciousness and especially its origins, this seems like a worthy bridge for many towards divine alignment and the awareness of the divine realm and our origins, that being God, the Creator of all that is. Would this help build belief for people and accelerate the readiness for ascension or would our efforts be better spent elsewhere?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
197 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “String theory has forced physics, as a branch of science, to explore that the underlying nature of reality consists of vibration. It has mathematically proven reliable and useful in the field of quantum physics. Is string theory accurate, as far as it goes, and can it unseat materialism with wider acceptance in the scientific community and create a bridge to the divine realm?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
290 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous123Next »
Ask Question