DWQA Questions › Tag: slander
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Socrates said, “When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.” Most atheists have been observed to make liberal use of the tool of “slander” in controlling a conversation and putting their well-intentioned opponent in a difficult position. But it has further been observed, that if one “stands strong,” and continues with their dialogue, unwavering and unaffected, many times the conversation can actually continue productively. Can Creator share advice on what to expect and how best to proceed when one is faced with an onslaught of “slander?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
225 views0 answers0 votes
In life, it is often true that before you can build something new, you first have to tear down something old. It’s been observed that many atheists have quite strong “faith” in their outlook and world views. So before they can even become receptive to new ideas, their currently “full” cup must be emptied. Anyone attempting to help someone empty a cup they are grasping tightly should expect quite a bit of resistance. But resistance isn’t always a retreat, or abandonment of the engagement, quite the opposite. If they are resisting, but not retreating, and are willing to engage, is that enough to allay any concerns about “coercing” them against their will?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
231 views0 answers0 votes
It has been observed that atheists have a kind of “hunt and destroy” approach to anything outside their world views. So while the would-be evangelist is attempting to empty and refill the cup of the atheist, the atheist is actually attempting to do the very same thing, but in reverse. Unfortunately, atheists are often better prepared in these contests, which is one of the reasons that if one of the parties is likely to come away disillusioned, it’s the evangelist and not the atheist. Can Creator comment on the importance of knowing what you are getting into, and choosing your battles carefully and wisely?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
213 views0 answers0 votes
One of the apparent attractions of atheism is that it is widely embraced by the smart, accomplished and savvy, while belief in the divine is portrayed as primitive, dumb, gullible, and the desperate clinging of people who can’t think for themselves and who are afraid of their own shadows. This is a VERY significant presumption to have to counter and dispel. Can Creator share the best strategy for countering this outlook most effectively?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
241 views0 answers0 votes
Creator has shared that humans are divine, but that atheism leads inexorably to depravity. Most atheists have a kind of utopian outlook for atheism that itself is a kind of fairy tale that doesn’t hold water when examined critically. Showing them that all atheistic outlooks eventually lead to depravity on a gargantuan scale, has been found to be an effective, but not pleasant approach to “raining on their parade.” This seems contrary to the preferred divine means of spreading love through positive reinforcements and messaging. Can Creator comment on the importance of “telling it like it is?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
268 views0 answers0 votes
The reality and nature of consciousness is one of the central topics of contention when conversing with atheists. Most do not believe in the existence of non-local consciousness in any form. Yet Creator has shared that everything is consciousness in actuality, and the interlopers would seem to have an outlook on non-local consciousness that is not as strict as that embraced by human atheists. What is the difference in outlook if any? Do the interlopers view the universe as primarily “dead,” as opposed to the divine reality of it all being ALIVE? Creator shared that the alien outlook is that non-local consciousness is a kind of “echo” that is a reflection of consciousness, but not ACTUALLY consciousness? Can Creator clarify whether or how true that is?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
240 views0 answers0 votes
It has been observed, that for most human atheists, the REAL bone of contention, isn’t the existence or non-existence of God, but rather the rejection of a tyrannical, hypocritical, arbitrary and capricious God who they view as “no friend of theirs.” In some ways, it appears like an ironic rejection of the Extraterrestrial Alliance who in fact are the ones who actually behave this way. Yet, it’s God who suffers the rejection. Can Creator comment on this perspective of atheists?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
248 views0 answers0 votes
It’s a long conversation to bring an atheist to the point where a discussion on the relative power and promise of prayer can even begin to be discussed. Atheists seem to want to avoid this particular topic more than any other. Can Creator share any insights on why this appears to be the case?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
267 views0 answers0 votes
How do prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol help the atheist to come around to actual REALITY? The reality of the divine?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
259 views0 answers0 votes
How would you make a case defending the reality of the divine to a group of atheists?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
279 views0 answers0 votes
Is the current political climate of hatred for the opposition justified and normal? Are the narratives tying political agendas to racial prejudice warranted and helpful to advance the cause of human progress?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
365 views0 answers0 votes