DWQA Questions › Tag: soul characteristicsFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesI was reviewing a recently published virology text and saw their discussion of the continuing controversy about whether viruses, despite having some characteristics of life forms, are actually alive. They acknowledge this is an important question for biologists because “a universally accepted definition for life does not exist.” Science, of course, has no idea that viruses possess consciousness, and, indeed, the issue of whether consciousness is present in life forms other than human beings is seriously debated. And even human consciousness is dismissed by some prominent scientists as being just a secondary consequence of brain chemical and electrical activity and perhaps just a “lucky accident” of evolution, more a fluke than a driving force. Are these views really the reverse of reality? Is the existence and expression of consciousness a universal property that defines whether something is alive? Is fundamental “life force energy” coming from the higher spiritual plane, which gives the spark of life, a special form of consciousness?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Non-Local Consciousness191 views0 answers0 votesPhysical matter, like rocks and bodies of water, have consciousness sufficient to perceive their surroundings and have thoughts. Is it because they are aggregates of energy that they have perceptions and can think, or are atoms, subatomic particles and all forms of energy, such as light, electricity, and magnetism possessed of consciousness with the same potentials? Are these energies alive? What is Creator’s perspective about defining whether something is alive?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Non-Local Consciousness241 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks about her sister’s receiving messages about, and embracing, New Age teachings: “Could you please ask Creator if there is anything to this? Is she being encouraged to be more captive to the New Age perspective?” What can we tell her?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Channeling Pitfalls185 views0 answers0 votesShe asks: “Is she, like most psychics, being controlled to limit her contribution?” What can we tell her?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Channeling Pitfalls174 views0 answers0 votesShe asks: “Is some dark controller doubling down to ensure she doesn’t question the message and methods she trusts? Are there reprisals waiting if she changes course?” What can we tell her?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Channeling Pitfalls165 views0 answers0 votesShe asks: “Is a competition being arranged for the hearts and minds of those we love?” What can we tell her?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Channeling Pitfalls200 views0 answers0 votesShe asks: “Is it possible that something positive is going on with her? What can I do for her?” What can we tell her?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Channeling Pitfalls189 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “In listening to the Pleiadians through a prominent channeler, a statement was made as follows: “…let the probing of the other dimensions alone for awhile unless you really know what you are doing…These are highly confused times and not only will the beings give you confusing information, but if they then take up occupation in your body, because you are not enough, and you want to be more important, then you are possessed. Once you are possessed, you can only go to the de-possessor so many times and have them taken off…” In requesting Creator clear a person of attachments through the Lightworker Healing Protocol, are there a finite number of times this can be fulfilled for one person? I would like to believe it is infinite.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Channeling Pitfalls185 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Could you ask Creator for a verification that my dowsing has been consistently accurately accessing divine guidance, since I started using it after Creator confirmed accuracy through you? I’m especially wondering about the past month. I’ve been getting some surprising answers that has made me want to make sure the dowsing itself is accurate.” What can we tell him?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Channeling Pitfalls165 views0 answers0 votesOne of the most publicized and stark juxtapositions of “standing strong” versus “not standing strong” ever recorded in history is the World War II incidents where General George Patton, Jr. slapped two soldiers during the invasion of Sicily. This is the summary from Wikipedia: “In early August 1943, Lieutenant General George S. Patton slapped two United States Army soldiers under his command … Patton’s hard-driving personality and lack of belief in the medical condition of combat stress reaction, then known as “battle fatigue” or “shell shock,” led to the soldiers’ becoming the subject of his ire in incidents on August 3 and 10, when Patton struck and berated them (in front of other wounded soldiers and medical personnel) after discovering they were patients at evacuation hospitals away from the front lines without apparent physical injuries.” Here is a directive sent to the officers of his command: “It has come to my attention that a very small number of soldiers are going to the hospital on the pretext that they are nervously incapable of combat. Such men are cowards and bring discredit on the army and disgrace to their comrades, whom they heartlessly leave to endure the dangers of battle while they, themselves, use the hospital as a means of escape. You will take measures to see that such cases are not sent to the hospital but dealt with in their units. Those who are not willing to fight will be tried by court-martial for cowardice in the face of the enemy.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Karma141 views0 answers0 votesPatton frequently claimed that he “hated war.” But almost nobody believed him. Such a statement seemed to violate almost everything anyone ever witnessed about his leadership. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Karma141 views0 answers0 votesBoth Patton and General Douglas MacArthur were considered Prima Donnas. Google defines prima donna as, “A very temperamental person with an inflated view of their own talent or importance.” Or, “Anyone who acted as if they were a world-famous talent.” But the irony is they were, indeed, “world-famous talents.” They were two of the most effective and successful combat leaders the world has EVER known. Yet many observers considered them “arrogant pretenders” nevertheless, and despised them for being so. Is this an example of “faking it ’til you make it,” and how much of this behavior was engaged in fully for “effect” but did not, in fact, reflect the men privately? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Karma156 views0 answers0 votesGeneral MacArthur used to frequently, and many would say recklessly, expose himself to danger in areas with known snipers. In one incident he actually stared out of a window at a sniper training his rifle at him from another building across the street. He then “casually” turned and walked away from the window a split second before a bullet came through the window aimed at him. When asked later about the behavior, he claimed he liked to “test his timing.” This behavior drove his subordinates “nuts.” Yet MacArthur survived the entirety of the war in his early sixties and without so much as a scratch. Patton behaved similarly and also survived the war, only to have his neck broken in the slightest of fender benders. What is Creator’s perspective on this behavior?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Karma160 views0 answers0 votesA lot of terrible and deeply evil figures in history were also prima donnas. So it’s completely understandable that such figures are deeply distrusted. Where does one parse out the positive example versus the arrogant threat? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Karma147 views0 answers0 votesWhat is Creator’s perspective on “combat stress reaction” or “battle fatigue?” So much of GetWisdom has been dedicated to healing historic trauma the deep subconscious reacts to, as this is understood to be the primary culprit behind MOST of our negative karmic issues and even the rise of evil itself in the galaxy. Yet trauma doesn’t have to be deep and can be right in your face, such as experienced by the soldiers Patton slapped (assuming their distress was quite real, and they were not faking it). Fleeing combat by any means certainly aligns with the karmic and divine imperative to protect oneself, but at the cost of abandoning their duty and comrades, not to mention setting an abysmal example of how to comport oneself in the face of danger. What is Creator’s perspective on this dilemma?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Karma143 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola