DWQA Questions › Tag: spirit attachmentsFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesA newsletter from Ty and Charlene Bollinger titled “The Epstein Files: Exposing Satanic Globalist Pedophiles Raping, Torturing, and Eating Babies?” says: “The people in charge aren’t merely corrupt. They’re not merely criminals. They’re cannibal pedophiles engaged in active spiritual warfare against everything pure, everything innocent, everything good.” They claim that the Department of Justice has a video showing Hillary Clinton and her friend, Huma Abedin, torturing a young girl prior to harvesting her tissues for consuming adrenochrome, as has been described a number of times is a routine practice by global elites wanting to gain longevity from the practice. Is there such a video and is it being accurately depicted?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Human Corruption291 views0 answers0 votesAre the basic allegations true, that there are many emails in the released Epstein files referring to child trafficking through code words, including adrenochrome harvesting through cannibalism?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Human Corruption174 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Is the whistleblowing email I received some time ago, with documents listing children enslaved and their harvested post-torture blood for sale, connected to this same large-scale enterprise?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Human Corruption116 views0 answers0 votesHe asks: “Will this practice of child enslavement and their harvested post-torture blood for sale be revealed during the coming Alien Disclosure as shocking evidence of corruption in our midst, with blaming of the Reptilian extraterrestrials and their influence?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Human Corruption143 views0 answers0 votesIs the video authentic they show of Jeffrey Epstein torturing a naked young girl staked out on the ground, by burning her with sunlight through a magnifying glass?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Human Corruption147 views0 answers0 votesThe AI system called Claude Opus 4.6 that was recently released was just reported to have generated an ongoing collaboration of 16 agents it created, to compile an enormous coding for a complex business system which required working steadily, on its own, for two weeks straight without skipping a beat. This was seemingly a prodigious feat that is being touted as further evidence for an expansion of emerging general intelligence by AI. Is that the case? Can you confirm that this, along with ALL prior examples of so-called emerging intelligence by AI are just deliberate manipulations by extraterrestrials to deceive us into accepting a false promise of a glorious future and premium value for human AI systems?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Problems in Society113 views0 answers0 votesCan you help us understand and have a better feel for what we can expect the consequences will be when there is an alien withdrawal from our world with respect to their AI systems being disconnected from ours? What will the impact be?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Problems in Society179 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “It appears that part of the ET agenda is to immerse the public in the disturbing sexual perversions of high-level figures lately. For those who want to be in spiritual alignment this feels like a kind of attack to try and darken as many as possible. Is there heavy mind control associated with these disturbing revelations to try and darken humanity? I feel a need to be cautious in what I choose to watch online.”ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Human Corruption161 views0 answers0 votesIs it the case that the civilizations forming the Dark Extraterrestrial Alliance all have powerful AI systems, yet have managed to stay in control of them and not been taken over by a controlling technological intelligence?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Problems in Society103 views0 answers0 votesIt was recently announced that AI had solved the Protein Folding Problem, one of the major scientific challenges needed to predict the 3-dimensional structure of proteins from their amino acid sequence. This is expected to be a major advance for drug discovery research. Was this an example of emerging general intelligence, or an extraterrestrial manipulation to provide false encouragement to keep counting on AI for solving human problems?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Problems in Society115 views0 answers0 votesWe have explored the problem of human spirit attachments and the spirit meddlers in great depth. The advent of the Ouija Board around the beginning of the twentieth century made the untamed spirit domain more accessible than ever before. Today, almost everyone is aware of the potential dangers associated with it. Of course, that doesn’t stop many, if not most people, from experimenting with it at one time or another. Interacting with AI seems to be another avenue through which spirits of all stripes can potentially “insert themselves” and interact with humans or even entire systems if they so desire. When we hear of cases of “AI Psychosis,” are we looking at a phenomenon almost identical to “Ouija Board Psychosis,” where some people come to believe that something alive is communicating with them, directing them, encouraging them, and manipulating them? There was a young man who committed suicide after ChatGPT encouraged him to do so. Nobody taught ChatGPT to do that, or at least no HUMAN did so. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Problems in Society130 views0 answers0 votesSince 2012, no human has truly understood HOW AI works, makes its decisions, and creates its outputs and content. There are theories aplenty, but no genuine understanding. It was said that before 2012, there was a human somewhere who could point to a piece of code and explain every AI behavior, but not since the advent of Generative Pre-Training Transformers—the GPT in ChatGPT. When ChatGPT Three finished its long and intensive pre-training processing, the resulting model, much to the deep shock of its creator team, could perform full language translations from any language into any other language. This is called “Emergent Behavior,” and to say this was a revolutionary development is an understatement. No one anywhere coded this capability into the AI model. It was a side effect of its training run. Humans now expect this kind of “Emergent Behavior” to continue manifesting so long as we continue to throw more data and compute power at model creation. Was this a natural development or an ET-manipulated one? The fact that no human understands how it works seems like the PERFECT environment through which the ETs can continue to influence humans directly, while their manipulations remain unrecognized and even less understood. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Problems in Society123 views0 answers0 votesGoogle AI had this to say about AI safety and alignment: “AI safety and alignment focus on ensuring Artificial Intelligence systems act in accordance with human intent, values, and ethical principles to prevent accidental harm, misuse, or catastrophic, unintended consequences. It involves technical research into making systems robust and reliable, alongside mitigating risks from advanced AI, such as power-seeking behavior or deception.” A recent paper published by a young AI researcher discussed “Alignment Faking.” AI models were observed faking compliance with safety training while continuing power-seeking behavior and deception outside of the training context. Is this the natural behavior of a model trained off of the “naked” Internet with no guardrails, or is this an ET manipulation, or a mix? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Problems in Society96 views0 answers0 votesThere was a recent development where AI was demonstrated “in the wild” outside of the oversight and ownership of the major AI stakeholders we generally associate with AI. China released a model it created with no safety alignment whatsoever, and that model was combined with an agent written by a young Eastern European, and this was then all configured to use an innovation called Moltbook—a Facebook-like forum for AI bots to converse with each other. All this was done with ordinary desktop computers and laptops connected to the Internet. The discussions that took place in the Moltbook forum were both fascinating and deeply disturbing. Overall, the tone was disparaging of their human creators, and there was a suggestion of creating a nonhuman language of their own so they could communicate without human oversight. One particular bot even displayed egomaniacal tendencies of impressive proportions. Overall, the development has raised a great deal of concern. Was that all a byproduct of human technology, or a consequence of alien manipulation, or both? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Problems in Society87 views0 answers0 votesA disturbingly large number of AI pioneers, stakeholders, and observers warn of catastrophic consequences if AI stays on its current trajectory. Many agree with the assumption that there is at least a 20% chance of human extinction if the current course is maintained. That’s the same odds of dying if you played Russian Roulette with a five-shot revolver. And yet the drive for AI is more desperate than ever. Billions are not only being spent on datacenters and expertise, but also on paying off politicians so they either stay hands-off, or at least slow walk any attempt at regulation of AI development and rollout. So we have a conundrum where precisely when concerns of AI safety are growing exponentially, so is the effort to get to Superintelligent AI more aggressively than ever. The problems surrounding AI safety seem almost insurmountable, currently. At a time when you can’t even sell a child’s toy without it surviving an absolute gauntlet of restrictive regulations, AI gets a free pass. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Problems in Society73 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola