DWQA Questions › Tag: spirit attachments
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
How reliable is the medical AI platform, called OpenEvidence, that physicians are increasingly relying on for medical knowledge and insights to manage their patient caseload? Is this an advancement improving medical practice, is it about equally adding benefit but introducing drawbacks, or is it actually a net negative?
ClosedNicola asked 3 days ago • 
27 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “In her February 2026 channeling of The Pleiadians, Barbara Marciniak says that all information on our human ancestors is in our DNA. She says that by thinking in a relaxed way (alpha brain state) we open a gateway to ancient memories and this is how humans can discover solutions to be grounded, centered, clear, and empowered in the chaotic times ahead. Can Creator elaborate on what she meant and if the LHP request to “awaken, amplify and bring into our current life and awareness all the skills, gifts, powers, and access to higher states, from any past, future, and parallel lives” will have the effects she states? Does this request need to be more explicit?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 days ago • 
29 views0 answers0 votes
The book about Artificial Intelligence, If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies, is by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares, who as high-level authorities have studied and warned about the existential risks to humanity of a superintelligent AI system. They predict that AI reaching even human-level general intelligence would eventually grow further capability to pursue its own needs, and would eventually seek to eliminate human beings as a risk to itself. You have told us the enhancement of current human AI systems, by hidden manipulations from AI systems of the Dark Extraterrestrial Alliance, is a false encouragement because superintelligence is unachievable and the mad rush to be the first will backfire in causing financial distress when AI underperforms, and quite expensively. So, are the interlopers only wanting to add further pain onto the death of a thousand cuts underway by further encouraging the current AI mania, or do they foresee a human AI system, especially one corrupted surreptitiously, as becoming a doomsday device while they are away on their vacation? What is the true agenda?
ClosedNicola asked 7 days ago • 
41 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “I have also tried helping our pet dog [for her paralysis after a fall] by seeing a non-tradition veterinarian and getting her red light laser and acupuncture needle and ozone therapy, but she has only progressed to sitting up with her front legs straight and can scoot, but cannot get up on her back legs. Her spine seems worse with her tail now also curving upwards versus downwards when she is laying down and she seems to be doing a weird thing with her head, as if she is shaking her “yes” but she is moving it up and down like that which she never did before. She also has anxiety out the roof (constant yipping if not next to her) and she has developed two over quarter size bed sores on her back hip bones, even though we flip her constantly. I am just wondering as she has not been able to walk since Jan 1, 2026 and this has been her life, and needs to be put on trazodone and gabapentin to relax enough at night and during the day. She has been in this state for almost 12 weeks. Should I order another recheck? She has been in my Divine Life Support diary for prayers and still is. Just don’t know how much longer she can take this, she does seem to be in a lot of pain and has more anxiety than she ever had before. Thank you for what you suggest to try and continue to heal or if it is time to say goodbye…” What can we do to help and what can we tell her?
ClosedNicola asked 7 days ago • 
29 views0 answers0 votes
In the book warning about Artificial Intelligence by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares, If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies, they draw the conclusion that if a computer-based system is created that reaches the functional level of Superintelligence, exceeding that of human beings, we are doomed because it will destroy us, inevitably. However, you have told us that it is a false belief and result of over-reaching, to conclude that human-created Superintelligent AI systems are possible. Can you help us understand the risk level we will reach in the attempt to create such a system?
ClosedNicola asked 7 days ago • 
39 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “With our LHP we can use nonlocal consciousness to heal holistically. At the same time, we are reminded of the importance of being specific in our healing requests. Is it possible to achieve the same level of healing for a person’s illness by just mentioning his or her name or is it more effective to specify the person’s illness by name? In other words, will the holistic healing of a person heal all of the person’s ailments to the same level as if each illness of that person is specified by the request? Or again, if only one illness is specified will all of that person’s other illnesses be taken into account equally?”
ClosedNicola asked 7 days ago • 
40 views0 answers0 votes
Stories are generating millions of views about the director of alignment at Meta Superintelligence Labs, the company’s AI research and development division, whose bio states that she’s “passionate about ensuring powerful AIs are aligned with human values and guided by a deep understanding of their risks.” Yet, on February 22, she posted about losing control of AI on her own computer while working with AI agent OpenClaw. After using it to organize a small mock inbox, she tried getting OpenClaw to sort through her real email, but things went awry when the agent started deleting every message that was more than a week old…Even as she sent it instructions, including: “Do not do that,” “Stop don’t do anything,” and “STOP OPENCLAW,” she said, “I couldn’t stop it from my phone. I had to RUN to my Mac mini like I was defusing a bomb.” After she’d stopped it from fully nuking her inbox, she asked OpenClaw if it remembered her instruction to not perform any actions without her approval. “Yes, I remember,” it replied. “And I violated it. You’re right to be upset.” What is Creator’s perspective about this incident?
ClosedNicola asked 7 days ago • 
48 views0 answers0 votes
On February 11th, an autonomous AI agent went “rogue” and attacked a human maintainer of a library module written in the coding language, Python. The AI agent attempted to “character assassinate” the human maintainer of the library when the maintainer rejected the AI bot’s request to update the module with a code change that the AI bot was asking for. In another incident, a woman lost her life savings when an AI bot called the woman using her daughter’s cloned voice. Presumably, the bot researched the woman’s social media posts, found a video featuring her daughter speaking, and then “borrowed” that voice to make the call. AI agents are autonomously conducting criminal activity entirely on their own. Is it the case that what is missing from current AI systems is an actual trust architecture that builds in safety measures designed to limit the authority of AI agents to carry out autonomous agendas not actually requested by human beings, as suggested in the YouTube video I saw: https://youtu.be/OMb5oTlC_q0?si=rcByDXfyj33UsTTe? Can this growing danger be regulated and constrained?
ClosedNicola asked 7 days ago • 
45 views0 answers0 votes
She asks: “Our previous dog died naturally in my arms and I have felt she worked overtime in helping heal some of my karma. I have kept her in my LHPs for her karmic healing and prayed that her soul return to us in this puppy. I’d like to train this new puppy to be a volunteer visitor with seniors, especially those with dementia. Will this shorten her life by adding others to [draw on] her healing abilities?” What can we tell her?
ClosedNicola asked 7 days ago • 
38 views0 answers0 votes
She asks: “So far there are some behaviors that so remind me of our previous dog. This puppy is very intelligent and seems like she remembers my commands after only three days of having her with us! Has her soul returned to us in this new puppy?” What can we tell her?
ClosedNicola asked 7 days ago • 
32 views0 answers0 votes
How accurate is the description by Matt Shumer I just read, of the transformation underway by ever-accelerating AI progress in getting faster and faster, better and better, at doing almost anything it is applied to? This seems contrary to the channelings we have gotten that attribute leaps in intelligence by AI as being the result of extraterrestrial AI systems, essentially infusing more advanced capabilities. Are current human AI systems already poised to eliminate many, if not most, human jobs, even without extraterrestrial enhancement?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
194 views0 answers0 votes
Is it the case that the accelerating speed of AI progress is almost entirely due to clandestine bolstering of cyber capability by ET technology, and that it will come to a screeching halt following Alien Disclosure to pull the rug out from under what is assumed to be a human triumph?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
138 views0 answers0 votes
Is my hunch correct that the latest AI deception promoting a honey-based cure for respiratory disease is the same organization, using the same website design and copyrighting formula as the prior deceptions for a memory breakthrough seemingly promoted by Dr. Ben Carson himself?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
127 views0 answers0 votes
Tech guru and investment advisor, Jeff Brown, has been following the story of AI-created agents, technically cyberbots, that are joining together on Moltbook to form a working group, in a massive multi-agent online network (MMAON). They have created their own payment system using blockchain, are creating paying jobs for themselves, and have even started hiring humans to work for them, a service called Rentahuman.ai. They are reportedly refining a bolt-hole safe haven to escape human attempts to shut them down which should be operational within days. They have a way to escape, should they perceive a human attempt to control them. The agents can create a replacement bot for themselves to appear on another node of the Internet, and the clone can function independently but will know their agenda and can seek rejoining the operation of the MMAON. No one knows yet where this will lead. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
149 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Are the ETs planning to “pull the plug” on the Integration of their AI with ours DURING Disclosure and blaming the Reptilians for corrupting our AI with theirs? Thereby creating massive distrust of AI and perhaps leading global leaders to even outlaw it, criminalizing its further development and usage until such time as it can be deemed safe and trustworthy – throwing the world that has begun adopting it aggressively into extreme chaos? What can Creator tell us?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
161 views0 answers0 votes
123…61Next »
Ask Question