DWQA Questions › Tag: Star Trek: The Next Generation
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
In the series, Star Trek: The Next Generation, the character of Data presents a number of conundrums artfully explored throughout the series. The biggest one is whether Data is “just a robot,” or something more? The debate was whether Data was in fact a new life form and therefore entitled to all the natural rights assumed to be possessed by actual sentient biological beings. Wickedly smart, yet childlike and benevolent to a fault, Data seemed to exude more genuine love than most of the humans in the show. This runs contrary to what we have been told is the nature of the robotic alien Greys and artificial intelligence in general. What is Creator’s perspective on this fictional character, and is it even possible to manufacture a creation such as Data?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
220 views0 answers0 votes
Our computer systems are based on a binary language. Our entire computing infrastructure is based entirely on combinations of ones and zeros. It is amazing what just two digits can manifest, and yet from another angle, it seems unbelievably primitive. Is computing within the ET Alliance also wholly binary, or is it based on constructs we either have yet to discover or implement?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
280 views0 answers0 votes
We know the ET Alliance has made copious use of nanotechnology. Molecular-sized “processors” that are in fact miniature computers in their own right. Humans, too, are now able to manufacture and utilize micro-tech. UFO Abductees have often been implanted with strange miniature devices that even now remain enigmatic. But we have also learned that the ET Alliance can utilize wholly “energetic” implants and have no dependency on a material implant. Can energy itself be shaped into a “computer” with its own operating system?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
231 views0 answers0 votes
We have learned that almost all our technology is created and manufactured to almost always be a mixed blessing. Useful, but toxic; helpful, but environmentally harmful; labor-saving, but needlessly dangerous, and so on. Aluminum is such a material. Extremely lightweight and durable, but toxic and difficult to make without gargantuan amounts of electricity. That said, aluminum siding was a popular product until the late 1970s when it fell drastically out of favor. The 1970s is also when there was a war on “lead paint” to get it off the market entirely. Turns out, both aluminum siding and lead paint interfere significantly with WiFi signals. Was this foreseen by the interlopers and is it an “overlooked” reason why there was such a push to move people away from both of these products?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
230 views0 answers0 votes
We have been told repeatedly about the dangers of WiFi. Yet it is pushed on us relentlessly, while fiber optics for signal transmission, especially in the United States, is slow to be utilized. Is use of fiber optics safe? Are there potentially safe implementations of more localized WiFi (like Bluetooth), while the primary conveyance can be done more safely with fiber optics rather than 5G and microwaves? If so, then why is this not being aggressively pursued?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
225 views0 answers0 votes
Can love be programmed within artificial intelligence, and if not, why not?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
239 views0 answers0 votes
“Garbage in, garbage out” is a popular saying. It also implies that the computer itself has no say or self-determination in the matter. Is this fundamentally true of artificial intelligence as well? Can artificial intelligence ever truly be self determining?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
195 views0 answers0 votes
We know the Anunnaki civilization is five billion years old. We know we got most of our technology either directly or indirectly from them, rather than predominately through human research and development. Without divine inspiration, it would seem quick innovations would be unlikely. How old was their civilization when they first acquired the level of computer sophistication that we humans have on Earth today? Can Creator comment?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
294 views0 answers0 votes
Introduced in Star Trek: The Next Generation, the Borg was an alien collective of fused biological beings with advanced technology to create a hive mind, considered by many to be the ultimate science fiction villain ever created. The Borg literally had no conscience, no love, no compassion, and saw the entirety of existence as simply a quest for more resources, more control, more power, and greater levels of technological prowess. Was the idea of this ultimate villain and menace to humanity divinely inspired? And if so, what is the important message behind their depiction?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
466 views0 answers0 votes
What is the genuine contrast to be made between the Borg and the more gentle Data?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
229 views0 answers0 votes
How can prayer work and the Lightworker Healing Protocol save humanity from the collective threat of the ET Alliance in spite of its overwhelmingly advanced technological prowess? How can both of these tools protect us from the ravages of WiFi and mind control manipulation on a day-to-day basis?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
239 views0 answers0 votes