DWQA Questions › Tag: time fluidityFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesAfter reviewing Karl Mollison’s channeling of James Randi and Whitney Houston about their experiences with being stuck in limbo after they passed, it seems clear that the experience is not always “uniform.” Indeed, the experience and intensity of the negativity can vary from individual to individual. We’ve learned in the past that some human lost soul spirits actually attach themselves to the energy field of living humans and find some genuine protection and sanctuary from predation there. After encountering the séance results above, about “spirit groups” working together in what still appears to be limbo or the lower astral plane, is it the case that like-minded spirits band together and form “in limbo” teams or communities? Given the otherwise very negative nature of the lower astral plane, especially the fact that it is home to nefarious spirits of all kinds, banding together would seem to make some sense. In the same way it’s safer to walk through a bad neighborhood with a group of people rather than alone, does the same hold true for the lower astral plane and those stuck in it? Is there safety in numbers? Do such groups or teams or communities exist, and if so, how do they help to alter or make lower astral plane living more palatable, if at all? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • Divine Realm80 views0 answers0 votesIn the book, An Atheist in Heaven, Paul Davids writes about interviewing “arch skeptic” Dr. Michael Shermer, executive director of The Skeptics Society, and founding publisher of Skeptic magazine. Dr. Gary Schwartz, in the same book, characterized Dr. Shermer as a “Type II skeptic.” He writes, “Sadly, there are individuals who claim to be ‘skeptics’ who are not open minded. They do not engage in careful questioning. They are not discerning in their evaluation of evidence. Though they may claim – often insistently – that they are undecided and seek the truth, in practice they are disbelievers or ‘unbelievers.’ They hold strong beliefs about what must be impossible. Furthermore, they often engage in irresponsible and unjustified evaluation of theories, methods, findings, and conclusions which challenge their convictions about what is possible in nature and the cosmos. This is pseudo-skepticism. I call this ‘Type II Skepticism.'” During his interview with Paul Davids, Dr. Michael Shermer certainly came off as a “Type II Skeptic.” However, later in the book, and just before it was published, Dr. Shermer ended up having his own very “mysterious” experience that he confessed “shook his skepticism.” He was getting married and his bride had an old transistor radio that belonged to her deceased grandfather that hadn’t worked in decades. New batteries didn’t help – the radio was dead. On their wedding day, his bride said she wanted to say something to him alone, so they went to the back of the house where they heard music playing in the bedroom. They opened a drawer and found her grandfather’s radio playing a romantic love song. Other family members reported the music started playing just as the wedding was to begin. The next day, the radio went silent and never worked again. Dr. Shermer’s bride was reportedly a skeptic as well, so how could this happen within the rules of engagement, especially since we know the divine realm will go to great lengths to protect the beliefs of skeptics? So much so that just the presence of James Randi, for example, could literally temporarily disable the intuitive abilities of those around him? What can Creator tell us about this radio at the wedding event and how it all fits within the rules of engagement? Was the bride’s grandfather still in limbo?ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • Divine Realm70 views0 answers0 votesDr. Gary Schwarz reported in the book, An Atheist in Heaven, that even after decades of research and seven books he wrote on the topic, he still struggled believing it all! He wrote, “In my case, being a well-trained skeptical thinker and well-educated disbeliever in the possibility of an afterlife, I had this strong, uncontrollable emotional reactive habit of automatically assuming that anyone who believed in life after death was naive, ignorant, stupid, brainwashed, prejudiced, delusional and/or crazy. This emotional reaction was clearly inconsistent with the emerging theory … and research. I experienced increasing conflict between what the emerging theory and research were teaching me versus my growing fear that if I accepted the theory and research, that maybe I was becoming ‘brainwashed’ by the theory and evidence, and I was even ‘losing my mind.’ I came to realize that I was like one of Pavlov’s classically conditioned dogs who automatically salivated to the sound of a bell. Dogs do not automatically salivate when they hear a bell ringing, and neither do we.” This confession by Dr. Schwartz is both revealing and disturbing. How could it possibly be that decades of research and validation could not successfully alter his emotions? How could he still harbor fear? Is all Type II Skepticism ultimately a FEAR reaction? Was the origin of Dr. Schwartz’s inexplicable emotions, even after decades, wholly originating with his deep subconscious? If so, it certainly reinforces Creator’s assertions that there is little short of divine intervention, via the Lightworker Healing Protocol and Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, that we can do to alter beliefs in the deep subconscious. What can Creator tell us about Dr. Schwartz’s struggle, and what lessons can we draw from it?ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • Divine Realm30 views0 answers0 votesDr. Gary Schwartz provided another deeply mysterious observation about himself in the book. He wrote, “It is now Alice in Wonderland time. For many people, it is having … direct personal experiences which leads us to change our minds. However, if a phenomenon is novel, challenging, and especially if it is ‘seemingly unbelievable,’ then having a direct personal experience with the phenomenon is often essential. And for certain phenomena, there is no substitute for experiencing it ourselves. … What I have discovered is that the more unbelievable events are replicated, the greater the level of disbelief one may experience. Often the so-called boggle factor does not decrease with replication, it actually increases. This increased disbelief is not rational; it is emotional. Replication and validation are cornerstones of the scientific method. On the one hand, with each replication we are more convinced that the phenomenon is real, and yet simultaneously the phenomenon feels more unbelievable and seemingly impossible. If any single ‘formally physical person’ illustrates this emotional boggle factor, it is Forry. As the empirical evidence accumulated, the case for Forry being alive and well became stronger and stronger, and yet simultaneously the evidence became more and more difficult to believe.” What is Creator’s perspective on this dilemma and conundrum?ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • Divine Realm59 views0 answers0 votesThe rules of engagement are certainly there for a reason. But also, arguably, they can be one of the biggest obstacles there is for creating critically needed change in this world. As Creator has said repeatedly, saving humanity is a “Divine Level Problem.” Can Creator tell us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are the tools we need to both work within the rules of engagement but also overcome the obstacles they represent at the same time?ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • Divine Realm64 views0 answers0 votesIn a channeling about the Rules of Engagement, you told us: “The more people are elevated and put on a pedestal, even for lofty thinking that is in divine alignment, the more karmic consequences can develop from people less fortunate becoming discouraged and feeling increasingly disempowered and helpless. Because all humans are interlinked as part of a family, the more exalted one becomes, the more it reflects an imbalance that will lower others affected by the contrast in seeing themselves as inferior and believing this is so.” Is this why Jesus Christ washed the feet of his disciples?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Divinely Inspired Messengers167 views0 answers0 votesWe have heard you explain many times that the divine realm is limited in how it can intervene in human affairs by the “Rules of Engagement.” Can you give us a tutorial to help people understand the specific rules and why they exist?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Divine Realm52 views0 answers0 votesApostle Peter said: “‘But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day…’ (2Peter 3:8,10)” What is the true meaning of this it was intended to convey?ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • Divine Realm327 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “The LHP asks for Creator to invite Gaia, the Sun, the solar system, and the rest of the free will galaxy to add their healing intentions to the LHP. Is there benefit to adding specificity in the form of requesting healing intentions from the consciousness of all Milky Way solar systems’ stars, black holes, dark matter, and sentient beings?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol277 views0 answers0 votesHe asks: “Can the healing intentions of the estimated 100 billion other galaxies also be requested and used for healing work?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol279 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “From my understanding of Karl’s channeling from Creator, illnesses such as cancer take many sessions to heal, and when asking for healing we must specifically state what we want healed. Since the LHP covers healing of all aspects of a person’s life, I have just been listing my family members’ names when doing an LHP and asking that all mental and/or physical problems be healed for them. I also include these same family members every time I do an LHP. In the protocol, each person’s higher self and God determines what needs to be healed. Have I been doing the LHPs wrong by not listing specific items for each family member that I think needs healing?” What can we tell her?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol272 views0 answers0 votesYou have told us not to encourage use of code words to launch an LHP session. Yet, rare individuals may be preconfigured in the light to enable this. Is it acceptable to tell practitioners it is okay to set up a code word to launch both the LHP and DSMR, knowing that only in rare instances will the LHP get done? Where is the harm, assuming they are not wasting significant time and energy to try augmenting their spiritual reach?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol247 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner writes: “One of the downsides of the code word approach according to Creator was that it freezes in place the current level of competence through belief quotient and level of intention summoned during that pilot session, because that becomes the energy on record to be repurposed each and every time going forward. To counter this limitation, I devised a workaround by adding to our boilerplate the following request: ‘Link all my iterations of this prayer in all time domains to my code-word I designate as ________, so that each time I say this code-word, the entire prayer requests are made including their indefinite repetitions.'” Will it work for him as he describes, because he was pre-configured in the light to have such wherewithal?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol261 views0 answers0 votesHe writes: “So every live session we do will automatically charge our code word LHP boilerplate with fresh intentions to ensure our code word LHP will be up to date with our live sessions going onward as the practitioner grows and evolves with his/her depth of understanding, knowledge, and heartfelt intentions. From the get go our small group members were able to launch code word LHP sessions. At that time they had less experience than they have now. Furthermore, all their live sessions automatically charge their pilot sessions with fresh intentions.” Is he correct? Have the practitioners following his method been successful linking the intentions from all their sessions to code words?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol255 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “Doing LHP and DSMR sessions can be boring. I’m concerned this lowers my effectiveness. You have mentioned that chanting can be one way of ramping up intention that will keep a person focused and at a high level of energetic intensity. To what extent would it increase effectiveness of LHP/DSMR sessions to incorporate at the beginning of an LHP or DSMR session this or other methods of boosting energetic intention or belief quotient such as meditation, mantras, visualizations, etc? Is boredom a significant factor in reducing effectiveness of healing sessions, and are there useful better ways of countering boredom and loss of focus?”ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol396 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola