DWQA Questions › Tag: afterlife
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Wikipedia defines Eternal Sin: “The unforgivable sin is interpreted by Christian theologians in various ways, although they generally agree that one who has committed the sin is no longer able to repent, and so one who is fearful that they have committed it has not done so.” Also: “… to sin against the Holy Ghost (an unforgivable sin) is to confound Him with the spirit of evil, it is to deny, from pure malice, the Divine character of works manifestly Divine.” What is Creator’s perspective on the concept of eternal and unforgivable sin?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
365 views0 answers0 votes
Organized religion makes much ado about sin and its consequences. It does advocate prayer as one weapon to be used in the battle against it, but we have also learned that the prayers intended for this purpose would hardly be considered “empowered.” Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol are the most effective means to combat the spiritual degradation of sin?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
364 views0 answers0 votes
One of the biggest mysteries there is, is Karl himself. Considering how truly rare his ability to channel Creator truly is, it’s a fair question to ask, “Why Karl?” Knowing Creator does not habitually lead us to insight without effort on our part, some idea as to “why Karl” has been formulated. We know from Creator that Karl was Allan Kardec. Looking at Kardec’s life, we see no real clue of Kardec possessing anything like Karl’s present abilities. In fact, he relied on mediums to do his research. But lots of people through the ages have done that also, so that by itself does not seem extraordinary. But what is extraordinary is the fact that his research spawned a movement, a new religion the size of Judaism. So, in a sense, Karl, as Kardec, hit the “good karma” jackpot. His legacy did not just create good karma, but literally a mountain of it. Millions of people over the last century and a half have evolved spiritually as a direct consequence of his work as Kardec. We know that our disconnection from our deep subconscious and higher self is a healing need. With the mammoth amount of good karma generated from his life as Kardec, was Karl’s “karmic backlog” substantially or even entirely healed to the point where his intuitive upgrade was not a gift but a genuine ATTAINMENT? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
538 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Source Creator, my beloved friend has recently arrived home to the divine realm after successful Lightworker Healing Protocol requests and prayers being launched for him. Can you tell us if he will be attending his own funeral (12/07/22) or will he be having ongoing healing after his transition?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
599 views0 answers0 votes
Do angels have an anatomy? Not a physical one, but an energetic one? Do they have an energetic brain? If they do, can they experience brain damage? Can an angel be murdered? Is being cut off completely from life force energy the only way an angel can perish, or are there others?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
401 views0 answers0 votes
Creator said angels do not have a subconscious, and further told us: “They have one integrated way of perceiving things and are able to see a wider array of sources of information; they have a much larger knowledge base. The problem they have is that their beliefs become distorted through time because of conflicts they have with wanting to satisfy desires of the soul that might not be appropriate in the moment.” Is the angel the entirety of its soul or a soul extension, like with human beings? Does an angel experience desires of the soul as something originating outside of their ego, the way a human might, something they have but whose true origin remains a mystery?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
409 views0 answers0 votes
Is my client’s sister now safely in the light after my doing a Spirit Rescue with the Lightworker Healing Protocol? Does she have any message for her brother?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
494 views0 answers0 votes
When reading material written by skeptics denying the existence of an afterlife, spirits, etc., their biggest agenda seems to be, “Do whatever it takes to avoid having to settle on a paranormal explanation for ANYTHING.” Why do these people have such a deep-seated aversion to the very notion of the paranormal? It’s almost as if the paranormal traumatizes them. Is that a valid insight? Could these people actually benefit from Deep Subconscious Trauma Resolution?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
435 views0 answers0 votes
Included in a skeptical article in the collection, The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case against Life after Death, was this VERY interesting reference, “Another recent study compared Theravada Buddhist Monks with lay novices … The authors found far more (brain) activity in the practiced monks than the novices during meditation, noting that the monks were able to dramatically self-regulate the activity of their frontoparietal and left insular areas.” This one statement dramatically undercuts the assertion that the brain controls ALL mental activity and not the other way around. Yet, it was nonchalantly included in an article whose agenda was to (quote) “Argue that the mind is located in the brain in such a way that there is no mental life after brain death … Our conclusion is overwhelmingly supported by neuroscientific evidence.” Yet they inexplicably include a neuroscientific case study that dramatically undercuts that conclusion. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
499 views0 answers0 votes
In an earlier show, Creator agreed with the statement, “You will learn more about reality by studying the extraordinary, than the ordinary.” Yet the ordinary is the focus of the skeptics in their attempts to prove that the paranormal is make-believe. In fact, skeptics have elevated this proclivity to have the force of law. In the volume, The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case against Life after Death, behavioral geneticist Jene Mercer writes, “The law of parsimony, a guiding rule for scientists for hundreds of years, states that given two equally well-supported explanations for a phenomena, we are best advised to choose the simpler one rather than multiplying entities unnecessarily.” Skeptics routinely “choose the simpler” by ignoring and throwing out exceptions and outliers in their data, all the while congratulating themselves for being scientific. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
376 views0 answers0 votes
Actress Marilu Henner is one of less than a hundred people in the world with Highly Superior Autobiographical Memory. She can literally remember every detail of her life. But she doesn’t appear to “remember” the way most do. Her son once asked her after testing her memory, “You’ve never explained how you do that?” Her reply was, “I don’t DO it, I just SEE it.” Others equated it to having Google in your brain. Is her deep subconscious pulling everything out of the akashic records on demand, and presenting it to her visually? Is this ability granted as a “mission life” to simply be a non-threatening billboard for what’s possible? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
433 views0 answers0 votes
In the book, Tesla: Man Out of Time, by Margaret Cheney, she quoted Nikola Tesla, who talked about having, “A peculiar affliction due to the appearance of images, often accompanied by strong flashes of light, which marred the sight of real objects and interfered with my thought and action. They were pictures of things and scenes which I had really seen, never of those I imagined. When a word was spoken to me, the image of the object it designated would present itself vividly to my vision and sometimes I was quite unable to distinguish whether what I saw was tangible or not.” Cheney continues, “In the stillness of the night, the vivid picture of a funeral he had seen or some other disturbing scene would thrust itself before his eyes, so that even if he jabbed his hand through it, it would remain fixed in space.” What can Creator tell us about this ability of Tesla’s? Does Marilu Henner see her memories in a similar fashion?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
432 views0 answers0 votes
Cheney quotes Tesla about his amazing visualization ability, “My method is different … I do not rush into actual work. When I get an idea I start at once building it up in my imagination. I change the construction, make improvements and operate the device in my mind. It is absolutely immaterial to me whether I run my turbine in my thought or test it in my shop. I even note if it is out of balance.” Cheney writes, “He claimed he was able to perfect a conception without touching anything. Only when all the faults had been corrected in his brain, did he put the device into concrete form.” Most people cannot begin to relate to this kind of ability. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
412 views0 answers0 votes
Brian made it through law school without taking notes. Not because he had a photographic memory, but because he couldn’t remember what the professor said long enough to write it down. Yet he made it through and passed the bar exam on his ability to intuit the law. He just seemed to grasp what the law was, correctly, for nearly any fact set presented. In his case, an unusual handicap was offset by an equally unusual analytical ability. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
444 views0 answers0 votes
We have learned that Karl was Allan Kardec in a past life. In that life, he was a scholar of ordinary abilities, who studied extraordinary phenomena. In his current life, he retains all the skills of Kardec, but now is a medium himself instead of having to rely on others. Can Creator explain in more detail how Karl’s abilities are an upgrade from Kardec’s, and what was involved in bringing that about?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
505 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous123456…14Next »
Ask Question