DWQA Questions › Tag: alien organisms
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A viewer asks: “Being aware of Creator’s previous answers on Vitamin D3 supplementation I was shocked to discover a paper from 2014 “A Statistical Error in the Estimation of the Recommended Dietary Allowance for Vitamin D”. The paper claims that the Recommended Daily Allowance advocated by the Institute of Medicine for Vitamin D was incorrectly calculated! In fact, analyzing the data correctly, nearly 9000 IUs per day are required to achieve target levels (600 IU per day is the USA recommended level). I was struck by how closely the 9000 IU figure matched Creator’s “daily doses of 5,000 to 10,000 IU vitamin D3 will rarely be harmful.” What is Creator’s perspective on this “miscalculation” coming to light?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
9 views0 answers0 votes
A British group reported recently that administration of vitamin D2, which is converted to vitamin D3 by the body, may be disadvantageous. A review of random controlled trials showed that taking vitamin D2 can lead to a decrease in vitamin D3 levels, the more active form generated by sunlight exposure. The research indicates that D2 supplementation may not only be less effective, but can also lead to lower concentrations of D3 in the circulation. [Emily I G Brown, et al. Effect of Vitamin D2 Supplementation on 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Nutr Rev, 2025 Sep 18:nuaf166.doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuaf166]. Is this an accurate and meaningful assessment? What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
12 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Would it be helpful to net all pathogens with white light to reduce their ability to trigger the immune system to fight back, causing ‘the collateral damage of many, many chronic illnesses and their symptoms,’ as described in the Divine Wisdom Database entry? Should/could the effects of viruses on the immune system be attenuated in a similar fashion to how dark spirit meddlers are addressed in the LHP? On page 5, ‘Have All Spirits, Pathogens, and Intruders Netted with a white Light (for any new arrivals),’ and on page 10, ‘Net all spirits, pathogens, and other intrusive energies within and around my clients following this session and hold them safely in place until they are removed by repeated protocol work.'” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
27 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “This question is asked in reference to Karl’s previous channeling of Source Creator on 10-28-25. [A practitioner asks: “Could we, for example, ask via the LHP that whenever we take an antiviral supplement, for all the benefits it brings to be automatically applied to our other lives as well? Could we, by doing so, authorize the divine to do more for us through this and help to remove viruses more aggressively? Could we perhaps even ask for the same benefits to be applied to all other humans or beings in general whenever we take an antiviral supplement ourselves or apply another physical method that allows for more direct removal of viruses from our bodies? Or is there perhaps another method by which this could be achieved?” What is Creator’s perspective? “This can be requested to happen—the application of the benefits of antiviral supplements be transferred to everyone, everywhere, across all timelines—but this will not be uniformly effective because each individual situation, time, place, circumstance, and the people involved will have an energetic matrix that will govern the energetics of what is allowable with respect to divine intervention and all of the variables, such as levels of belief in the divine, belief in the self, and the inner barriers to change from corrupted beliefs about one’s physical makeup and circumstances. People believe in their illnesses and this is a barrier to divine healing. So this is a highly variable and uncertain undertaking but it can be requested for more to be done.” The above channeling, describing barriers to divine intervention for implementation of antiviral supplement benefits across timelines, seems unsurprising. The same restrictions apply quite variably, to potentially every request in both the LHP and DSMR protocols. Divine intervention is always uncertain as to the degree and effectiveness allowable, depending on individual circumstances and energies. Is there a workaround we are unaware of that would help this sharing of antiviral healing and protection be more uniformly potent? Knowing these barriers exist, can we simply request they be transmuted into welcoming and amplifying positive energies?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
28 views0 answers0 votes
A review article shows little or no benefit of supplementing patients with vitamin D3 for bone fractures (T. Gatt, A. Grech, and H. Arshad. The effect of Vitamin D supplementation for bone healing in fracture patients: a systematic review. Adv. Orthopedics Volume 2023, Article ID 6236045). However, the supplement doses of vitamin D3 were either low, 800-2000 IU daily, or quite high loading doses orally or systemically of 100,000 to 300,000 IU. Was their negative assessment justified or were the studies flawed? Would taking a 5000 to 10,000 IU dose of vitamin D3 daily, give significant benefit for healing bone fractures?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
134 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “In a recent channeling Creator has said that the divine can’t take viruses directly out of us because that would essentially amount to killing them, but that we can use physical measures such as antiviral supplements to get rid of viruses ourselves without accumulating karma from doing so. On the other hand, we have been told and know that Creator regularly removes viruses from food or beverages to be ingested if we use the daily prayers. I would like to understand why it seems to be possible for you to remove viruses from our food directly but not from our bodies? Isn’t it essentially the same as killing the viruses when removed from our food? What’s the difference? Is it because, in the case of food, the viruses haven’t come into contact with the consciousness of a host body yet and can therefore be removed more easily? Is it because they can be removed from food without killing them or something else entirely?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
117 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “It was a bit disappointing to find out that remote healing via the LHP seems to be rather limited when it comes to removing viruses directly. Creator has stated that more than 85% of all chronic illnesses are viral in origin, so that seems to be quite a limitation for what remote healing is able to achieve if one of the main culprits that is responsible for most illnesses seems to be off-limits, at least in a direct and immediate sense. The fact that we can take measures into our own hands and use antiviral supplements or other physical methods to free ourselves from these viruses is all well and good but there are still massive limits in place that will hinder our progress. What about our other lives, for example?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
101 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “So we may have been lucky enough to find out the truth about viruses and what to do against them in this life, thanks to Karl’s brilliant work, but what good is it if it comes to our many other lives where we don’t possess this knowledge, let alone the means to do anything about it? To me this seems like a rather big hole in the healing equation that needs to be addressed somehow. Is there any kind of “loophole” by which we could achieve more in this regard?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
74 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Could we, for example, ask via the LHP that whenever we take an antiviral supplement, for all the benefits it brings to be automatically applied to our other lives as well? Could we, by doing so, authorize the divine to do more for us through this and help to remove viruses more aggressively? Could we perhaps even ask for the same benefits to be applied to all other humans or beings in general whenever we take an antiviral supplement ourselves or apply another physical method that allows for more direct removal of viruses from our bodies? Or is there perhaps another method by which this could be achieved?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
86 views0 answers0 votes
A systematic review of 416 medical journal articles affirmed a strong association between higher serum vitamin D levels and a lower risk of bladder, breast, colon, endometrial, esophageal, gallbladder, kidney, ovarian, pancreatic, rectal, stomach, and vulvar cancers, as well as Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. The review also uncovered lower risks of metastasis and mortality from cancer in patients with higher levels of vitamin D. While vitamin D levels of 20 ng/ml (50 nmol/L) were adequate for bone and muscle health, reduction of cancer risk and mortality required levels greater than 40 ng/ml (100 nmol/L) and fell further with levels above 50 ng/ml (125 nmol/L). The review cautioned that studies showing no benefit for those taking less than 5,000 IU per day might be misleading. [Wimalawansa SJ. Vitamin D’s impact on cancer incidence and mortality: a systematic review. Nutrients. 2025 Jul 16;17(14):2333. Doi: 10.3390/nu17142333.] Is this a fair summary of vitamin D benefits for limiting incidence and severity of cancer?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
64 views0 answers0 votes
You have told us that 5000 IU of vitamin D3 taken twice a day would be safe and helpful for many, many people. Is that enough to get serum levels in a useful range for cancer prevention?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
56 views0 answers0 votes
Studies have shown that vitamin D levels have an inverted U-shaped curve, where low levels (<29.7 nmol/L) result in shortened telomeres on DNA, a sign of aging, but so do high levels of vitamin D (>95.9 nmol/L). Population-based studies and randomized clinical trials have shown a U- or J-shaped curve and suggested an increased risk of adverse outcomes in those with the highest serum Vitamin D levels, including falls, fractures, and frailty. Most studies have reported a higher risk in those participants with serum levels above 100 nmol/L. Are the deleterious effects noted in these studies caused by elevated vitamin D? If so, your support for taking 5,000 to 10,000 IU of vitamin D3 daily seems risky. What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
54 views0 answers0 votes
Are the two wide-spectrum Hemp extracts from Hempland, Cannabitol 5000 and Cannabitol 5000 ECS5, equal in effectiveness as antivirals or close enough, so that people can choose the cheapest one in order to economize without too great a penalty if that is an important consideration? What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
71 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “What can you tell us about the benefits versus risk factors in taking the bone medication Evenity? Cost is high, but insurance can help. Can you tell us if it is highest and best to take this or if it would be better to continue LHP-DSMR healing requests without outside chemical interventions? Side effects with this drug are concerning.”
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
61 views0 answers0 votes
In reflecting on the information you gave us for our Get Wisdom Live episode titled “Creator Discusses Extreme Human Vulnerability to Authority,” I am wondering about a possible sinister influence by the interlopers to corrupt Homeowner’s Associations. Horror stories are legion about poor oversight, favoritism, onerous rules, and negative experiences of all kinds. To what extent are such groups being undermined to cause problems?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
102 views0 answers0 votes
123…16Next »
Ask Question