DWQA Questions › Tag: Almighty
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
After reviewing Karl Mollison’s channeling of James Randi and Whitney Houston about their experiences with being stuck in limbo after they passed, it seems clear that the experience is not always “uniform.” Indeed, the experience and intensity of the negativity can vary from individual to individual. We’ve learned in the past that some human lost soul spirits actually attach themselves to the energy field of living humans and find some genuine protection and sanctuary from predation there. After encountering the séance results above, about “spirit groups” working together in what still appears to be limbo or the lower astral plane, is it the case that like-minded spirits band together and form “in limbo” teams or communities? Given the otherwise very negative nature of the lower astral plane, especially the fact that it is home to nefarious spirits of all kinds, banding together would seem to make some sense. In the same way it’s safer to walk through a bad neighborhood with a group of people rather than alone, does the same hold true for the lower astral plane and those stuck in it? Is there safety in numbers? Do such groups or teams or communities exist, and if so, how do they help to alter or make lower astral plane living more palatable, if at all? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
59 views0 answers0 votes
In the book, An Atheist in Heaven, Paul Davids writes about interviewing “arch skeptic” Dr. Michael Shermer, executive director of The Skeptics Society, and founding publisher of Skeptic magazine. Dr. Gary Schwartz, in the same book, characterized Dr. Shermer as a “Type II skeptic.” He writes, “Sadly, there are individuals who claim to be ‘skeptics’ who are not open minded. They do not engage in careful questioning. They are not discerning in their evaluation of evidence. Though they may claim – often insistently – that they are undecided and seek the truth, in practice they are disbelievers or ‘unbelievers.’ They hold strong beliefs about what must be impossible. Furthermore, they often engage in irresponsible and unjustified evaluation of theories, methods, findings, and conclusions which challenge their convictions about what is possible in nature and the cosmos. This is pseudo-skepticism. I call this ‘Type II Skepticism.'” During his interview with Paul Davids, Dr. Michael Shermer certainly came off as a “Type II Skeptic.” However, later in the book, and just before it was published, Dr. Shermer ended up having his own very “mysterious” experience that he confessed “shook his skepticism.” He was getting married and his bride had an old transistor radio that belonged to her deceased grandfather that hadn’t worked in decades. New batteries didn’t help – the radio was dead. On their wedding day, his bride said she wanted to say something to him alone, so they went to the back of the house where they heard music playing in the bedroom. They opened a drawer and found her grandfather’s radio playing a romantic love song. Other family members reported the music started playing just as the wedding was to begin. The next day, the radio went silent and never worked again. Dr. Shermer’s bride was reportedly a skeptic as well, so how could this happen within the rules of engagement, especially since we know the divine realm will go to great lengths to protect the beliefs of skeptics? So much so that just the presence of James Randi, for example, could literally temporarily disable the intuitive abilities of those around him? What can Creator tell us about this radio at the wedding event and how it all fits within the rules of engagement? Was the bride’s grandfather still in limbo?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
49 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Gary Schwarz reported in the book, An Atheist in Heaven, that even after decades of research and seven books he wrote on the topic, he still struggled believing it all! He wrote, “In my case, being a well-trained skeptical thinker and well-educated disbeliever in the possibility of an afterlife, I had this strong, uncontrollable emotional reactive habit of automatically assuming that anyone who believed in life after death was naive, ignorant, stupid, brainwashed, prejudiced, delusional and/or crazy. This emotional reaction was clearly inconsistent with the emerging theory … and research. I experienced increasing conflict between what the emerging theory and research were teaching me versus my growing fear that if I accepted the theory and research, that maybe I was becoming ‘brainwashed’ by the theory and evidence, and I was even ‘losing my mind.’ I came to realize that I was like one of Pavlov’s classically conditioned dogs who automatically salivated to the sound of a bell. Dogs do not automatically salivate when they hear a bell ringing, and neither do we.” This confession by Dr. Schwartz is both revealing and disturbing. How could it possibly be that decades of research and validation could not successfully alter his emotions? How could he still harbor fear? Is all Type II Skepticism ultimately a FEAR reaction? Was the origin of Dr. Schwartz’s inexplicable emotions, even after decades, wholly originating with his deep subconscious? If so, it certainly reinforces Creator’s assertions that there is little short of divine intervention, via the Lightworker Healing Protocol and Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, that we can do to alter beliefs in the deep subconscious. What can Creator tell us about Dr. Schwartz’s struggle, and what lessons can we draw from it?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
18 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Gary Schwartz provided another deeply mysterious observation about himself in the book. He wrote, “It is now Alice in Wonderland time. For many people, it is having … direct personal experiences which leads us to change our minds. However, if a phenomenon is novel, challenging, and especially if it is ‘seemingly unbelievable,’ then having a direct personal experience with the phenomenon is often essential. And for certain phenomena, there is no substitute for experiencing it ourselves. … What I have discovered is that the more unbelievable events are replicated, the greater the level of disbelief one may experience. Often the so-called boggle factor does not decrease with replication, it actually increases. This increased disbelief is not rational; it is emotional. Replication and validation are cornerstones of the scientific method. On the one hand, with each replication we are more convinced that the phenomenon is real, and yet simultaneously the phenomenon feels more unbelievable and seemingly impossible. If any single ‘formally physical person’ illustrates this emotional boggle factor, it is Forry. As the empirical evidence accumulated, the case for Forry being alive and well became stronger and stronger, and yet simultaneously the evidence became more and more difficult to believe.” What is Creator’s perspective on this dilemma and conundrum?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
39 views0 answers0 votes
The rules of engagement are certainly there for a reason. But also, arguably, they can be one of the biggest obstacles there is for creating critically needed change in this world. As Creator has said repeatedly, saving humanity is a “Divine Level Problem.” Can Creator tell us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are the tools we need to both work within the rules of engagement but also overcome the obstacles they represent at the same time?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
49 views0 answers0 votes
In a channeling about the Rules of Engagement, you told us: “The more people are elevated and put on a pedestal, even for lofty thinking that is in divine alignment, the more karmic consequences can develop from people less fortunate becoming discouraged and feeling increasingly disempowered and helpless. Because all humans are interlinked as part of a family, the more exalted one becomes, the more it reflects an imbalance that will lower others affected by the contrast in seeing themselves as inferior and believing this is so.” Is this why Jesus Christ washed the feet of his disciples?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
129 views0 answers0 votes
We have heard you explain many times that the divine realm is limited in how it can intervene in human affairs by the “Rules of Engagement.” Can you give us a tutorial to help people understand the specific rules and why they exist?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
40 views0 answers0 votes
Apostle Peter said: “‘But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day…’ (2Peter 3:8,10)” What is the true meaning of this it was intended to convey?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
321 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks about Detroit Lions’ key player, Aiden Hutchinson, who recently had a tibial fracture: “Was it just a “freak” accident? Did karma contribute? Were the interlopers involved at all? If not, I imagine they have to feel pretty good about it.” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
299 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “What are the spiritual and karmic implications of getting tattoos? Would Creator advise against them, or is it mostly inconsequential?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 12 months ago • 
373 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Why don’t our scientific studies give some credence to belief in your own healing?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
218 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks about an injury to a Detroit Lions kicker: “Veteran kicker Michael Badgley suffered an injury on Thursday getting ready for practice, Lions head coach Dan Campbell announced Friday morning. Campbell said the injury will require surgery and Badgley will be placed on injured reserve and miss the season. “I feel awful for Badgley, man,” Campbell said. “He worked his tail off to get ready for this season and he was having a good spring and was ready for camp. It’s tough.” He tore his hamstring muscle during practice warmups. Practice warmups? How does that happen?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
243 views0 answers0 votes
The term, “Achilles’ heel” is commonly used to represent one’s most vulnerable spot or weakness that could bring about a downfall. Greek mythology describes the tragic weakness of Achilles, a powerful figure in the Trojan War, dying from a mortal wound to his heel. Was that based on a true story of a military leader felled by extraterrestrial manipulation of what is now called the Achilles’ tendon, which can produce a crippling injury when ruptured?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
340 views0 answers0 votes
A news report said: “San Francisco 49ers linebacker Dre Greenlaw’s leg gave out at the most devastating of moments. As Greenlaw prepared to run back onto the field for another Niners defensive series with 9:26 left in the second quarter of Sunday’s 25-22 Super Bowl LVIII overtime loss to the Kansas City Chiefs, he injured his left leg. Coach Kyle Shanahan confirmed after the game that Greenlaw tore his Achilles tendon. As often happens with Achilles injuries, Greenlaw’s came without contact and at the most inopportune of times. The Niners had just punted the ball back to the Chiefs before Greenlaw and his defensive teammates were about to go back on the field.” He reportedly had suffered Achilles tendonitis during recent games, but is that really a normal vulnerability, to have the Achilles tendon just give way, “without contact and at the most inopportune of times?” Is there anything sinister about this?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
275 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Analytical psychotherapist Carl Jung believed in inherited unconscious knowledge and experiences across generations, expressed through universal symbols and archetypes such as gods like Mars (god of war), Venus (goddess of love), Prometheus (rebelliousness) and so on. Earlier civilizations such as the Roman Empire took the existence of such gods literally and assumed they were responsible for day-to-day events. How should we now understand this idea? Are gods in fact dynamic psychic energies that have an existence that can be personified and communicated with, to better understand, for example, diseases and illness? In what ways is this a useable idea in modern times?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
270 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1234…12Next »
Ask Question