DWQA Questions › Tag: Anunnaki
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
There is a good joke that’s been around for a while, but it’s especially pertinent when it comes to evaluating AI: “It must be true, I read it on the Internet.” Everyone knows this means it’s more likely not to be true. But when it comes to AI, almost everything it “knows” comes from the Internet. And because it tends to weigh true and false by frequency of encounter, the more AI encounters the same images, assertions, statements, treatments, opinions, etc., the more statistically weighted it will be. The term, “There’s safety in numbers,” comes to mind in that the idea is, the more frequently something is encountered, the more genuine it probably is. This becomes AI’s “default assumption” about the material it is trained with. It can only utilize, evaluate, and regurgitate the material it is trained with. This turned out to be quite a problem early on because the sheer amount of racist, violent, and derogatory material on the Internet was not fully appreciated until AI started digesting it. It became necessary to employ untold thousands of low-paid (on the order of two dollars a day) “content evaluators,” mostly in third-world countries, to filter out gore, hate speech, child sexual abuse material, and pornographic images. If AI read it on the Internet, it must be true? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
257 views0 answers0 votes
The authors of The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want wrote: “With LLMs (large language models), the situation is even worse than garbage in/garbage out – they will make paper-mache out of their training data, mushing it up and remixing it into new forms that don’t preserve the communicative intent of original data. Paper-mache made out of good data is still paper-mache.” They also write: “This is why we like to call language models (like popular chatbots) ‘synthetic text extruding machines.'” They also write: “In the case of language modeling, the correct answer of which word came next is just whatever word happened to come next in the training corpus. … So if (popular chatbots) are nothing more than souped-up autocomplete, why are so many people convinced that it’s actually ‘understanding’ and ‘reasoning?'” Why indeed? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
170 views0 answers0 votes
Propaganda has always been a huge problem, but may be an even bigger issue for AI. China and the Chinese Communist Party spend more money and effort, and engage more of its citizens to spread blatantly false propaganda, than perhaps the rest of the world combined. To such an extent that it felt the need to create its very own global social media platform, TikTok. The Trump administration has even proposed banning TikTok altogether because of the nefarious role the platform plays in both gathering intelligence and spreading propaganda. Some of the lies people are starting to believe about China, that it has no crime, that its infrastructure is some of the most advanced and safest in the world, that there are no homeless people in China, that everyone there has a meaningful and lucrative job, that they are the healthiest and happiest people on the planet, and on and on. When, in fact, the exact opposite is more often than not the case. And for every good lie they tell about themselves, they tell an equally bad one about America and Europe. The problem is, they are so prolific and extreme with this propaganda that the Chinese people themselves believe none of it (about themselves, anyway), and Americans and Europeans (especially young ones) are beginning to believe all of it. With AI having no way to filter this for truth or falsity other than volume, there appears to be a genuine danger of AI itself presenting this propaganda as gospel truth, that China is great and America and Europe are evil. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
277 views0 answers0 votes
The authors of AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference, suggest that the track record of AI used for predicting social outcomes is so abysmally bad that it may actually amount to fraud. They write: “In short, some existing limits to predictability could be overcome with more and better data, while others seem intrinsic (built in and unfixable). In some cases, such as cultural products (like resume scanning AI, or AI used to decide who gets social benefits), we don’t expect predictability to get much better at all. In others, such as predicting individuals’ life outcomes, there could be some improvements but not drastic changes. Unfortunately, this hasn’t stopped companies from selling AI for making consequential decisions about people by predicting their future. So it is important to resist AI snake oil that’s already in wide use today rather than passively hope that predictive AI technology will get better.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
180 views0 answers0 votes
The authors of both books [The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want and AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference] were not the least bit concerned that AI presented an immediate or near-term existential threat to humanity in any way, shape, or form, despite copious media hype to the contrary. All the authors, on the other hand, were VERY concerned about the misuse of AI to reduce our freedom and agency to choose for ourselves, to retain the rights to our creative outputs, and even to have recourse when AI decides wrongly (which they assert it is guaranteed to do). Can Creator tell us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are the best ways to combat the danger and encroachment of AI in our lives?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
178 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “When the perpetrators go back in time in order to redo a period of time, does the aging of our bodies revert back to the state it was in at that previous time, or do our bodies continue aging through that process, thus aging twice as much?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
181 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Before the human genome was degraded by the Anunnaki, it is said that the divine human could converse with Creator via a type of natural duplex communication system. As a result, was belief in the Almighty made easier for the Divine Human? Was faith still necessary for an understanding of Creator’s existence? If not, then what can be said for the notion that Creator didn’t lead, and was the Free Will Paradigm, from a human perspective, different in any way when compared to the present?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
294 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Was the Prophet Jesus Christ really crucified? And if so, why? Why wasn’t he protected from the crucifixion? Also, I’ve heard of interpretations that the Prophet Jesus Christ was not crucified and, in fact, they crucified someone else who resembled him. I would like a clarification.” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
290 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Having listened to an “Alien Agenda Update” from months ago it was said that the ETs are only going to retreat in case ET disclosure happens. Does that mean that prayers directed to a prevention of ET disclosure won’t be followed up on by the divine? Given that people are so programmed humanity is going to accept the ETs quite certainly which would lead to annihilation. What should our prayers focus on after ET disclosure happens in order to save humanity? Wouldn’t it be safer to prevent ET disclosure and the ETs staying here instead of them retreating?” Can you help clarify once again, the main agenda items that the interlopers want to happen and what is unavoidable, so prayer power is not being misdirected?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
337 views0 answers0 votes
You have told us there has not been an alien time travel to the past disrupting things within the past year, but there was one not too long before, in order to optimize preparation for their plans leading up to the desired Alien Disclosure deception. Is one of the limitations of this strategy, that even the alien AI systems are not very good at making future predictions, that they can see what changes might be needed to happen, making a return to the past desirable to enable re-using that time span, but will not know how long a period will be needed to implement the changes fully enough to change the future in the desired ways? In other words, using their time travel technology to manipulate our world more certainly toward a desired end result will inevitably introduce some additional uncertainty about the time it will require to implement the changes effectively?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
179 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Have the interlopers implemented a time reset in the last year, or are we still experiencing the same timeline with their same plans for power outages, disclosure, and gold reset?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
278 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Is Artificial Intelligence (AI) fully an ET creation? Or did some form of ancient AI exist before the creation of physical ETs and affect them somehow? Is there any other origin of AI from another timeline, dimension, or reality affecting ETs that is also affecting humanity? How important will Organic Intelligence from nature and humanity and the divine be in coming times with Artificial Intelligence on the rise (before Ascension perhaps)?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
343 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Sometimes I don’t want to further include my father’s physical maladies in my LHP-DSMR work, because he is a very difficult and problematic individual, he has said and done something deeply wrong and hurtful to other family members. I know this thought doesn’t sound in divine alignment, but I really resent him at this moment. What kind of karmic liabilities will I incur if I go down this path?” What can we tell her?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
353 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Pagels wrote, “Mark suggests that Jesus recognizes that the leaders who oppose him are energized by unseen forces.” Given the extraordinary powers Jesus possessed, he would almost certainly know who those unseen forces were. Today we know from Creator’s words that it is Anunnaki psychics interacting with humans directly, Anunnaki psychics directing lost soul Anunnaki spirits to attack humans in hit-and-run style encounters, while also instructing the Anunnaki lost soul spirits to enlist and command the fallen angelic spirit meddlers to attack and attach themselves and even directly possess human beings. Jesus is said to have driven seven demonic spirits out of Mary Magdalene—one for each of her seven major chakras. Was Jesus aware at that time that he was going against a galactic empire of extraterrestrials with mastery of time and space? Creator did say the Bible was primarily a whistleblowing document on the extraterrestrial problem. Jesus clearly knew that back in the light. Was his struggle in the desert a coming to terms with remembrance of what he was really up against, what he needed to do, and how it would likely play out? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
410 views0 answers0 votes
The widespread narrative is, of course, that the Romans crucified an innocent man. But innocent of what? Because, if anything, Jesus was extraordinarily politically incorrect. Dr. Pagels wrote, “The astonished crowds recognize that Jesus possesses a special authority, direct access to God’s power. … the scribes immediately took offense at what they considered his usurpation of divine authority. By pronouncing forgiveness, Jesus claims the right to speak for God – a claim that, Mark says, angers the scribes: ‘Why does this man speak this way? It is blasphemy! Who can forgive sins but God alone? Instead of fasting, like other devout Jews, Jesus ate and drank freely. And instead of scrupulously observing Sabbath laws, Jesus excused his disciples when they broke them. Claiming divine and royal power while simultaneously violating the purity laws, Jesus, at the beginning of his public activity, outrages virtually every party among his contemporaries, from the disciples of John the Baptist to the scribes and Pharisees.'” We are faced with the conundrum of Jesus “speaking truth to power.” The hazards of which are so visibly and starkly apparent from human history, that his eventual crucifixion was not only NOT a surprise but, in fact, an almost near certainty. Anyone wishing to follow his example and engage in speaking “truth to power,” as he did, is not likely to avoid a similar life-threatening fate. What lessons are we to best derive from this? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
347 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous123456…36Next »
Ask Question