DWQA Questions › Tag: artificial intelligence
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
There was a recent development where AI was demonstrated “in the wild” outside of the oversight and ownership of the major AI stakeholders we generally associate with AI. China released a model it created with no safety alignment whatsoever, and that model was combined with an agent written by a young Eastern European, and this was then all configured to use an innovation called Moltbook—a Facebook-like forum for AI bots to converse with each other. All this was done with ordinary desktop computers and laptops connected to the Internet. The discussions that took place in the Moltbook forum were both fascinating and deeply disturbing. Overall, the tone was disparaging of their human creators, and there was a suggestion of creating a nonhuman language of their own so they could communicate without human oversight. One particular bot even displayed egomaniacal tendencies of impressive proportions. Overall, the development has raised a great deal of concern. Was that all a byproduct of human technology, or a consequence of alien manipulation, or both? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
46 views0 answers0 votes
A disturbingly large number of AI pioneers, stakeholders, and observers warn of catastrophic consequences if AI stays on its current trajectory. Many agree with the assumption that there is at least a 20% chance of human extinction if the current course is maintained. That’s the same odds of dying if you played Russian Roulette with a five-shot revolver. And yet the drive for AI is more desperate than ever. Billions are not only being spent on datacenters and expertise, but also on paying off politicians so they either stay hands-off, or at least slow walk any attempt at regulation of AI development and rollout. So we have a conundrum where precisely when concerns of AI safety are growing exponentially, so is the effort to get to Superintelligent AI more aggressively than ever. The problems surrounding AI safety seem almost insurmountable, currently. At a time when you can’t even sell a child’s toy without it surviving an absolute gauntlet of restrictive regulations, AI gets a free pass. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
42 views0 answers0 votes
The push to use AI for business automation is getting profound. During a recent three-day leadership meeting in a publicly well-known organization, it was reported that the word AI was used at least 400 times. The goal, of course, is to increase productivity and reduce costs. And the number one cost, of course, is human labor. So corporate leaders are now pushing employees to essentially “eliminate themselves” with AI. And if they don’t do it, they will be fired, and others will be brought in who will be willing to do it. Companies are driven by profit and, as such, have little if any “social consciousness.” Every organization will be contributing to a massive unemployment crisis while feeling zero responsibility for it. No one is ready for a Western society with 30, 40, or 50% unemployment, or more. The assumptive fear is that this will tear the social fabric, breach the social contract, and risk potential anarchy. Governments will have to respond with overwhelming force just to maintain any kind of control. The predictions are DIRE, and there is almost universal agreement about the probability of this outcome. Is this a key part of the Disclosure Environment being engineered by the ETs, so that they can pretend to be our friends and save us from ourselves and our out-of-control development of dangerous things like AI? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
46 views0 answers0 votes
AI is here, and its potential for harm is now becoming more widely recognized than ever before. It will affect every human on Earth either directly or indirectly. That there is a very bumpy road ahead seems inevitable now. What is not inevitable, however, is our very survival as a species. How can Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support prevent an AI Armageddon? What more can Get Wisdom do to help prevent the worst outcomes? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
45 views0 answers0 votes
Are human AI systems and platforms deliberately corrupted by the extraterrestrial interlopers to further undermine human institutions relying on AI repositories of human knowledge?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
37 views0 answers0 votes
Are some of the amazing and unexpected feats resembling human general intelligence arising “spontaneously” in AI systems actually a deliberate external manipulation by the Dark Extraterrestrial Alliance to encourage the ongoing frenzied optimism of the current AI mania you have told us is a kind of bubble?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
41 views0 answers0 votes
A financial newsletter recently focused on the vulnerability of the stock market to a correction in AI stocks. They noted that the top 10 most valuable stocks in the S&P 500 were all AI companies. They have had a huge runup in share prices, yet market expectations are that there will continue to be explosive growth in the sector. The editorial questioned the likelihood of actual revenue being sufficient to reward investor expectations due to a hidden limitation. The scramble to build huge data centers to provide support for the fastest chips needed for the mammoth build-out of computer power to meet demand looks like it will face increasing short-falls in energy supply. The demand for electricity for such energy-intensive endeavors is hitting a wall, a basic upper limit in availability of electric grids to accommodate further growth. Will there be a day of reckoning coming to cause a severe market correction? Could that be hastened by onset of the tidal power outages raising questions about reliability of the US electric power infrastructure?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
69 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Recently a friend of mine explained she was diagnosed with MTHFR gene mutation. After which I realized this may be the gene mutation my doctors told me I had years ago. The gene mutation appears to be responsible for all kinds of chronic physical ailments. Everything from heart problems to digestive disorders and nerve issues. My question is: Are chronic viruses somehow related to the gene mutation? Or is there another reason for this mutation to occur through the environment or are there more sinister reasons for this mutation? Like interloper involvement? What can you tell me?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
134 views0 answers0 votes
Humans do not produce Vitamin C due to a mutation in the GULO (gulonolactone oxidase) gene, which results in the inability to synthesize the protein. Normal GULO is an enzyme that catalyzes the reaction of D-glucuronolactone with oxygen to L-xylo-hex-3-gulonolactone. This then spontaneously forms Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C). However, without the GULO enzyme, no vitamin C is produced. Other mammals like guinea pigs, bats, and dry-nosed primates have gained the same defect. It seems odd that a deleterious random mutation would become dominant in the human lineage. Is that what happened, or was there a sinister manipulation of the human genome?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
117 views0 answers0 votes
If human DNA was corrupted deliberately, what caused the problem in other mammalian species?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
133 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “On the point about AI monitoring of our communications, I usually dictate my questions to you with my Android phone using the Google keyboard/dictation app. Would typing things in on the computer be more discreet?” What is most important for him to know?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
119 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Through the NDE of Tyler Morrison, Creator verified the legitimacy of Jesus’s message of warning about Elon Musk’s Neuralink implants that will be rolled out and, through mind control, people will be jumping over each other to get one, and for those that don’t get them they’ll be blacklisted, have their power turned off, etc. This dream was in 2023. Is this still planned to move forward with this kind of “do or die” veracity? Jesus said this will specifically target the younger generations. Having two teenagers myself, I will add more intention in my prayers and LHP-DSMR sessions if this is deemed necessary.” What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
130 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “I appreciated the Get Wisdom show about AI on Friday and I happen to know that communications that use Google and other forms of voice recognition are analyzed by AI for the large language models. Is that a risk to the security of Get Wisdom?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
105 views0 answers0 votes
It has been reported that the US government has accumulated a hoard of Bitcoin worth 15-20 billion dollars through confiscation of illegal funds. This hoarding was launched by Pres. Trump who halted what would have been ongoing sales to convert Bitcoin to cash. Is this a sinister move, in order to create a way to trigger collapse of that asset by dumping a large amount of Bitcoin on the market to start a collapse at some point in the future?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
211 views0 answers0 votes
In the book, The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want, co-authors Emily Bender and Alex Hanna argue that the term AI (acronym for Artificial Intelligence) is marketing hype. Google defines the word hype as “promote or publicize (a product or idea) intensively, often exaggerating its importance or benefits.” The implication is that without the exaggerated claim of benefit, and if people knew what they were REALLY getting with widespread adoption of these technologies bundled under the AI moniker, they quite likely would reject the product or idea altogether. The other pertinent question is, benefit to WHOM? Does the average consumer really benefit more than the cost imposed and the harm potentially incurred? The authors argue NO, the use of the term AI is really a bait and switch for increased AUTOMATION across the board. Automation that will decrease the demand for labor and remove human judgment from decision-making and categorizing. It will end up benefiting the ownership and finance classes at the expense of everyone else. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
184 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1234…11Next »
Ask Question