DWQA Questions › Tag: artificial intelligence
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
You have said to us many times that the interlopers are carrying out a Trojan Horse maneuver to deceive us in representing themselves as benevolent white-hat ETs who are here to help save us from the black-hat variety who have infiltrated our world. Is the current rollout and escalation of the mad dash to create ever-more-powerful AI systems, in effect, a Trojan Horse bringing a kind of false-hope with alien encouragement that will ultimately backfire, causing damage and economic losses from within our own infrastructure?
ClosedNicola asked 15 hours ago • 
23 views0 answers0 votes
Recent channeling to probe a client’s business plans, which rely heavily on Artificial Intelligence support and implementation, were pessimistic about things working out. Was this an objective assessment?
ClosedNicola asked 15 hours ago • 
11 views0 answers0 votes
The concerns raised about vulnerability of internal Artificial Intelligence systems to being breached and corrupted, even the surreptitious creation of a back door allowing unfettered interloper access, would seem to predict likelihood of things going wrong, inevitably, and quite possibly to a catastrophic degree. Is this going to be seen almost universally across industries that have embraced and depend on AI for their infrastructure? Is that the plan? What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 15 hours ago • 
14 views0 answers0 votes
Will this systemic failure of company Artificial Intelligence platforms even be coordinated to happen all at once to generate a crippling chaos?
ClosedNicola asked 15 hours ago • 
11 views0 answers0 votes
It is difficult for me to tell from this channeling to what degree, if any, using Artificial Intelligence could be considered wise. It is clear from the discussion that advanced agentic AI systems pose greater dangers from going rogue, not only allowing intrusive clandestine oversight and manipulation, but fatal sabotaging of operations. But what safety guarantees exist that today’s simpler platforms won’t be altered by the interlopers to allow higher-level manipulations and damaging actions?
ClosedNicola asked 15 hours ago • 
18 views0 answers0 votes
You told us recently that human reliance on Artificial Intelligence would prove to be a costly mistake and many problems and limitations would become evident, but that the Extraterrestrial Alliance is not counting on existing platforms to become a doomsday device during their planned absence. This new channeling seems more dark, and even uses the term “doomsday device.” Does the interloper planning envision a more important role of AI failures to continue softening up humanity for their eventual annihilation? Is one important factor for the delay in launching the planned sequence of major catalysts, starting with the tidal power outages, the need for more time to put in place greater human reliance on AI systems and to ensure they are sufficiently corrupted?
ClosedNicola asked 15 hours ago • 
25 views0 answers0 votes
The stock market continues its bullish trend, reaching all-time highs again this week. We just saw a financial adviser predict gasoline would reach $10.00 a gallon and that many supermarket shelves would be empty because of coming shortages. Was that just exaggerated pessimism, or an accurate forecast given current plans of the Extraterrestrial Alliance to cause a financial collapse? If accurate, what can you tell us about when the downturn will start?
ClosedNicola asked 16 hours ago • 
14 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Mobility data from cars and cellphones behaves like a fingerprint. The real danger isn’t collection of data by manufacturers—it’s what happens when that data is reused, combined, and reinterpreted later. The data can reveal: home/work locations, socioeconomic status, social relationships, etc. This secondary use turns mobility data into a long-term control tool because its meaning and power expand every time it is resold. People might avoid certain places, limit their movements, self-censor activities or purchases, etc. This creates a voluntary limit to movement, liberty, and association. Is this the intended purpose, or is the data fed into ET AI systems for better control?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 17 hours ago • 
17 views0 answers0 votes
How reliable is the medical AI platform, called OpenEvidence, that physicians are increasingly relying on for medical knowledge and insights to manage their patient caseload? Is this an advancement improving medical practice, is it about equally adding benefit but introducing drawbacks, or is it actually a net negative?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
74 views0 answers0 votes
The book about Artificial Intelligence, If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies, is by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares, who as high-level authorities have studied and warned about the existential risks to humanity of a superintelligent AI system. They predict that AI reaching even human-level general intelligence would eventually grow further capability to pursue its own needs, and would eventually seek to eliminate human beings as a risk to itself. You have told us the enhancement of current human AI systems, by hidden manipulations from AI systems of the Dark Extraterrestrial Alliance, is a false encouragement because superintelligence is unachievable and the mad rush to be the first will backfire in causing financial distress when AI underperforms, and quite expensively. So, are the interlopers only wanting to add further pain onto the death of a thousand cuts underway by further encouraging the current AI mania, or do they foresee a human AI system, especially one corrupted surreptitiously, as becoming a doomsday device while they are away on their vacation? What is the true agenda?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
96 views0 answers0 votes
In the book warning about Artificial Intelligence by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares, If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies, they draw the conclusion that if a computer-based system is created that reaches the functional level of Superintelligence, exceeding that of human beings, we are doomed because it will destroy us, inevitably. However, you have told us that it is a false belief and result of over-reaching, to conclude that human-created Superintelligent AI systems are possible. Can you help us understand the risk level we will reach in the attempt to create such a system?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
72 views0 answers0 votes
Stories are generating millions of views about the director of alignment at Meta Superintelligence Labs, the company’s AI research and development division, whose bio states that she’s “passionate about ensuring powerful AIs are aligned with human values and guided by a deep understanding of their risks.” Yet, on February 22, she posted about losing control of AI on her own computer while working with AI agent OpenClaw. After using it to organize a small mock inbox, she tried getting OpenClaw to sort through her real email, but things went awry when the agent started deleting every message that was more than a week old…Even as she sent it instructions, including: “Do not do that,” “Stop don’t do anything,” and “STOP OPENCLAW,” she said, “I couldn’t stop it from my phone. I had to RUN to my Mac mini like I was defusing a bomb.” After she’d stopped it from fully nuking her inbox, she asked OpenClaw if it remembered her instruction to not perform any actions without her approval. “Yes, I remember,” it replied. “And I violated it. You’re right to be upset.” What is Creator’s perspective about this incident?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
111 views0 answers0 votes
On February 11th, an autonomous AI agent went “rogue” and attacked a human maintainer of a library module written in the coding language, Python. The AI agent attempted to “character assassinate” the human maintainer of the library when the maintainer rejected the AI bot’s request to update the module with a code change that the AI bot was asking for. In another incident, a woman lost her life savings when an AI bot called the woman using her daughter’s cloned voice. Presumably, the bot researched the woman’s social media posts, found a video featuring her daughter speaking, and then “borrowed” that voice to make the call. AI agents are autonomously conducting criminal activity entirely on their own. Is it the case that what is missing from current AI systems is an actual trust architecture that builds in safety measures designed to limit the authority of AI agents to carry out autonomous agendas not actually requested by human beings, as suggested in the YouTube video I saw: https://youtu.be/OMb5oTlC_q0?si=rcByDXfyj33UsTTe? Can this growing danger be regulated and constrained?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
85 views0 answers0 votes
How accurate is the description by Matt Shumer I just read, of the transformation underway by ever-accelerating AI progress in getting faster and faster, better and better, at doing almost anything it is applied to? This seems contrary to the channelings we have gotten that attribute leaps in intelligence by AI as being the result of extraterrestrial AI systems, essentially infusing more advanced capabilities. Are current human AI systems already poised to eliminate many, if not most, human jobs, even without extraterrestrial enhancement?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
224 views0 answers0 votes
Is it the case that the accelerating speed of AI progress is almost entirely due to clandestine bolstering of cyber capability by ET technology, and that it will come to a screeching halt following Alien Disclosure to pull the rug out from under what is assumed to be a human triumph?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
172 views0 answers0 votes
123…12Next »
Ask Question