DWQA Questions › Tag: brain tumors
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
I am concerned about recommending people take 12 mg of ivermectin daily for 3 weeks (along with hydroxychloroquine). Was I over-influenced by having that interchange with [Name Withheld] about “his protocol” to believe that giving both compounds would effect a viral cleanout? Was this a lesson to me about being more thorough, knowing as I investigated the literature about appropriate doses of ivermectin I would see the pharmacokinetic data, revealing the inability of oral administration to reach antiviral concentrations? What is most important for me to know?
ClosedNicola asked 2 days ago • 
17 views0 answers0 votes
Recommending use of ivermectin in a way that is not even scientifically supportable seems like a big risk, even if you say it will work. What am I missing? How can high protein binding not be a hindrance to achieving a therapeutic exposure to free drug? Is there a scientific phenomenon here not yet scientifically understood or appreciated, at least not be me? Can you give us a tutorial to explain your continued endorsement and value of ivermectin, in addition to hydroxychloroquine which has demonstrated in vivo efficacy as an antiviral?
ClosedNicola asked 2 days ago • 
12 views0 answers0 votes
In a paper on the pharmacokinetics of ivermectin, they report that even at a very high dose, free plasma levels never get close to the concentration needed, shown by in vitro studies, to demonstrate antiviral activity because ivermectin is 93% bound to plasma proteins. Yet, you have reassured us that taking an oral dose of 12 mg daily for 3 weeks would be effective in many cases for getting a profound, if not total, eradication of susceptible chronic viruses. Can you explain how that is possible?
ClosedNicola asked 2 days ago • 
12 views0 answers0 votes
A study was just reported that ivermectin, in a nanoparticle formulation for helping to cross the blood-brain barrier, was highly effective in shrinking brain tumors in rats by 70% after giving a tiny daily dose for 10 days. Because of poor drug delivery to the brain without a special formulation, does this mean that ivermectin will not be effective in treating dementia, despite its antiviral activity?
ClosedNicola asked 7 days ago • 
24 views0 answers0 votes
Matt McCormick wrote, “Research shows remarkable relationships between brain tumors and brain chemistry, on the one hand, and bizarre thoughts or behaviors, on the other. In one patient the onset of hypersexuality, obsession with pornography, and pedophilia paralleled the growth of a tumor in his right orbitofrontal lobe. When the tumor was removed, his urges lapsed. When the tumor grew back, his pedophilia returned.” What can Creator tell us about this tumor-to-behavior relationship?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
386 views0 answers0 votes
Matt McCormick wrote, “Patients with no history of gambling find themselves overwhelmed with the urge to gamble when their dosages (of Parkinson’s drug pramipexole) cross a particular threshold, sometimes leading them to gamble away their life savings. But when the dosage is reduced, the urge vanishes.” Can Creator tell us what is REALLY going on here?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
370 views0 answers0 votes
Matt McCormick wrote, “Even something as common as the effects of a cup of espresso show that those elements of consciousness alleged to survive biological death depend directly upon the brain.” This seems like missing the forest for the trees. Stimulus effects are conditions that arouse the “decision-maker” within, but they do not decide for her or him! Otherwise, it would be impossible to resist ANYTHING. And life calls for a great deal of discerning resistance! Is it safe to say that DECISION is a spiritual function, not a biological function? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
343 views0 answers0 votes
Matt McCormick wrote, “Even rats are responsive to the pain of others, refusing to eat when their eating inflicts electric shocks on other rats.” He used this to argue that even morality is a product of evolution. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
384 views0 answers0 votes
Atheist evolutionists have a tendency to showcase theory as fact. Matt McCormick wrote, “(Experts)… have now converged on the view that evolution favored hyperactive agency detection devices (HADD). The basic idea is there is survival benefit to detecting or attributing agency or intentionality to many things in our environment. ‘It is better to mistake a boulder for a bear, than a bear for a boulder.’ Mistaking too many things as conscious agents is a helpful error since detecting too few of them can be deadly.” McCormick speculates that this is why we are so quick to believe in brainless consciousness. We can’t help it. McCormick writes, “The prevailing view is that seeing manifestations of God’s conscious will, desires, and goals in the world is a byproduct of HADD.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
377 views0 answers0 votes
The secular headwinds are strong, and appear to be growing stronger. Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol can turn this trend around, in time to save humanity from the encroaching darkness?
ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • 
411 views0 answers0 votes
Ask Question