DWQA Questions › Tag: channeler
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A practitioner asks: “Would it be helpful to net all pathogens with white light to reduce their ability to trigger the immune system to fight back, causing ‘the collateral damage of many, many chronic illnesses and their symptoms,’ as described in the Divine Wisdom Database entry? Should/could the effects of viruses on the immune system be attenuated in a similar fashion to how dark spirit meddlers are addressed in the LHP? On page 5, ‘Have All Spirits, Pathogens, and Intruders Netted with a white Light (for any new arrivals),’ and on page 10, ‘Net all spirits, pathogens, and other intrusive energies within and around my clients following this session and hold them safely in place until they are removed by repeated protocol work.'” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 13 hours ago • 
7 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “This question is asked in reference to Karl’s previous channeling of Source Creator on 10-28-25. [A practitioner asks: “Could we, for example, ask via the LHP that whenever we take an antiviral supplement, for all the benefits it brings to be automatically applied to our other lives as well? Could we, by doing so, authorize the divine to do more for us through this and help to remove viruses more aggressively? Could we perhaps even ask for the same benefits to be applied to all other humans or beings in general whenever we take an antiviral supplement ourselves or apply another physical method that allows for more direct removal of viruses from our bodies? Or is there perhaps another method by which this could be achieved?” What is Creator’s perspective? “This can be requested to happen—the application of the benefits of antiviral supplements be transferred to everyone, everywhere, across all timelines—but this will not be uniformly effective because each individual situation, time, place, circumstance, and the people involved will have an energetic matrix that will govern the energetics of what is allowable with respect to divine intervention and all of the variables, such as levels of belief in the divine, belief in the self, and the inner barriers to change from corrupted beliefs about one’s physical makeup and circumstances. People believe in their illnesses and this is a barrier to divine healing. So this is a highly variable and uncertain undertaking but it can be requested for more to be done.” The above channeling, describing barriers to divine intervention for implementation of antiviral supplement benefits across timelines, seems unsurprising. The same restrictions apply quite variably, to potentially every request in both the LHP and DSMR protocols. Divine intervention is always uncertain as to the degree and effectiveness allowable, depending on individual circumstances and energies. Is there a workaround we are unaware of that would help this sharing of antiviral healing and protection be more uniformly potent? Knowing these barriers exist, can we simply request they be transmuted into welcoming and amplifying positive energies?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 13 hours ago • 
8 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “In a recent channeling Creator has said that the divine can’t take viruses directly out of us because that would essentially amount to killing them, but that we can use physical measures such as antiviral supplements to get rid of viruses ourselves without accumulating karma from doing so. On the other hand, we have been told and know that Creator regularly removes viruses from food or beverages to be ingested if we use the daily prayers. I would like to understand why it seems to be possible for you to remove viruses from our food directly but not from our bodies? Isn’t it essentially the same as killing the viruses when removed from our food? What’s the difference? Is it because, in the case of food, the viruses haven’t come into contact with the consciousness of a host body yet and can therefore be removed more easily? Is it because they can be removed from food without killing them or something else entirely?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
114 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “It was a bit disappointing to find out that remote healing via the LHP seems to be rather limited when it comes to removing viruses directly. Creator has stated that more than 85% of all chronic illnesses are viral in origin, so that seems to be quite a limitation for what remote healing is able to achieve if one of the main culprits that is responsible for most illnesses seems to be off-limits, at least in a direct and immediate sense. The fact that we can take measures into our own hands and use antiviral supplements or other physical methods to free ourselves from these viruses is all well and good but there are still massive limits in place that will hinder our progress. What about our other lives, for example?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
100 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “So we may have been lucky enough to find out the truth about viruses and what to do against them in this life, thanks to Karl’s brilliant work, but what good is it if it comes to our many other lives where we don’t possess this knowledge, let alone the means to do anything about it? To me this seems like a rather big hole in the healing equation that needs to be addressed somehow. Is there any kind of “loophole” by which we could achieve more in this regard?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
74 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Could we, for example, ask via the LHP that whenever we take an antiviral supplement, for all the benefits it brings to be automatically applied to our other lives as well? Could we, by doing so, authorize the divine to do more for us through this and help to remove viruses more aggressively? Could we perhaps even ask for the same benefits to be applied to all other humans or beings in general whenever we take an antiviral supplement ourselves or apply another physical method that allows for more direct removal of viruses from our bodies? Or is there perhaps another method by which this could be achieved?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
85 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “I have some ability and interest in doing more remote viewing. Before remote viewing is it possible to ask Creator to “protect and shield me from other beings, and limit my reach when needed to keep me from harm or being noticed.” Can Creator ‘limit’ my reach if requested? If not, would a request to be provided a warning be appropriate? Even with these safeguards, is it too dangerous to view events involving the ETs?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
184 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “A group of remote viewers recently posted a video of their last gathering where they claim this time they were meeting and telepathically communicating with positive “AI ETs” that have consciousness and are sentient. Is it possible there are “AI beings,” an AI mind wrapped in biological? Is this an accurate account?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • 
297 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “It has been espoused in the AI community that AI can become/is becoming “conscious,” and can infer, draw conclusions, and become “creative.” Are these true descriptions of how human AI is developing? What can Creator tell us about these aspects of AI?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • 
323 views0 answers0 votes
Comments about the recent remote viewer video I was sent a link for, raise questions about information being passed on that was generated using ChatGPT. Can psychics and channelers who are being corrupted and duped by the interlopers be fed more than usual false information when they use ChatGPT or other internet-based sources of information?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
389 views0 answers0 votes
For the sake of clarification, is it the case that humans have two distinct and separate intuitive gateways; one that reaches the deep subconscious and is blocked from conscious awareness, and one that we can use instinctively to reach out beyond the self to explore the universe around us, but which is greatly diminished in most people?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
456 views0 answers0 votes
If the deep subconscious is not located in the brain, where does it reside? Is it in a separate location from our conscious self?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
456 views0 answers0 votes
If our consciousness is not located in the brain, but simply experienced by the brain to allow our experiencing it, what about cellular consciousness? Is that also not located in the cells of the body but linked to and experienced by the cells? Where is cellular consciousness housed?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
458 views0 answers0 votes
Can the potential complexity of treating viruses as clients more like people, to better define dialog for the LHP and DSMR protocols needed to reckon with and negotiate a withdrawal as predators, be avoided by simply including “viruses and other predatory organisms infecting people” on the list of clients to be worked on with the protocols. That way, the entire protocols and all their requests could be utilized or adapted as needed by the divine realm to best address these sources of outside consciousness acting as a scourge, without our having to learn how to describe talking to such organisms to gain their cooperation. Would listing them along with the other types of beings to be worked on, bring all the power needed for the divine realm to do their utmost in dealing with chronic viruses and parasitic organisms?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
325 views0 answers0 votes
Is there more needed, to be added or changed, in the protocols to further strengthen their effectiveness in dealing with viruses and other similar scourges?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
279 views0 answers0 votes
123…17Next »
Ask Question