DWQA Questions › Tag: control
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
You have said to us many times that the interlopers are carrying out a Trojan Horse maneuver to deceive us in representing themselves as benevolent white-hat ETs who are here to help save us from the black-hat variety who have infiltrated our world. Is the current rollout and escalation of the mad dash to create ever-more-powerful AI systems, in effect, a Trojan Horse bringing a kind of false-hope with alien encouragement that will ultimately backfire, causing damage and economic losses from within our own infrastructure?
ClosedNicola asked 6 days ago • 
46 views0 answers0 votes
Recent channeling to probe a client’s business plans, which rely heavily on Artificial Intelligence support and implementation, were pessimistic about things working out. Was this an objective assessment?
ClosedNicola asked 6 days ago • 
27 views0 answers0 votes
The concerns raised about vulnerability of internal Artificial Intelligence systems to being breached and corrupted, even the surreptitious creation of a back door allowing unfettered interloper access, would seem to predict likelihood of things going wrong, inevitably, and quite possibly to a catastrophic degree. Is this going to be seen almost universally across industries that have embraced and depend on AI for their infrastructure? Is that the plan? What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 6 days ago • 
30 views0 answers0 votes
Will this systemic failure of company Artificial Intelligence platforms even be coordinated to happen all at once to generate a crippling chaos?
ClosedNicola asked 6 days ago • 
29 views0 answers0 votes
It is difficult for me to tell from this channeling to what degree, if any, using Artificial Intelligence could be considered wise. It is clear from the discussion that advanced agentic AI systems pose greater dangers from going rogue, not only allowing intrusive clandestine oversight and manipulation, but fatal sabotaging of operations. But what safety guarantees exist that today’s simpler platforms won’t be altered by the interlopers to allow higher-level manipulations and damaging actions?
ClosedNicola asked 6 days ago • 
34 views0 answers0 votes
You told us recently that human reliance on Artificial Intelligence would prove to be a costly mistake and many problems and limitations would become evident, but that the Extraterrestrial Alliance is not counting on existing platforms to become a doomsday device during their planned absence. This new channeling seems more dark, and even uses the term “doomsday device.” Does the interloper planning envision a more important role of AI failures to continue softening up humanity for their eventual annihilation? Is one important factor for the delay in launching the planned sequence of major catalysts, starting with the tidal power outages, the need for more time to put in place greater human reliance on AI systems and to ensure they are sufficiently corrupted?
ClosedNicola asked 6 days ago • 
44 views0 answers0 votes
A recent article in the New Yorker magazine by Ben Taub [A Fatal Error: A celebrated researcher got a case wrong—did he obscure a poisoning?] describes how a single infant death may have been misinterpreted. It raised disturbing concerns about dangers of new mothers who breast feed taking codeine-containing painkillers, like Tylenol-3. Was this manipulated to happen to make a toxicologist raise an alarm and doggedly pursue a relentless campaign to impose unnecessary restrictions?
ClosedNicola asked 6 days ago • 
26 views0 answers0 votes
The 1983 movie War Games is famous for a response from the computer when it finished war-gaming nuclear war. It said, “Strange game. The only winning move is not to play.” Many seem to believe this applies to controversial conversations as well. The only winning move is not to converse at all. When it comes to engaging in controversial conversations, when might this strategy be in divine alignment, and even more importantly, when is it not? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 6 days ago • 
32 views0 answers0 votes
A quote from the book The Courage to be Disliked by Ichiro Kishimi and Fumitake Koga reads, “Children who have not been taught to confront challenges will try to avoid all challenges.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 6 days ago • 
32 views0 answers0 votes
Spreading the message of Get Wisdom to others likely means successfully engaging in many challenging, difficult, and controversial conversations. How can Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support help aspiring speakers of truth to spread the word as effectively as possible?
ClosedNicola asked 6 days ago • 
44 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Several writers and scholars have written books on what has been called the “Big History” of humanity, covering time way before written historical records and relying on geological, anthropological, and archaeological evidence. Some writers such as R.A. Boulay have written on humans supposed existence on Earth from about 500,000 years ago. How accurate is Boulay’s book, Flying Serpents and Dragons: The Story of Mankind’s Reptilian Past? It has been dismissed as “pseudoarchaeology”—interpreting myths as literal history without material evidence.”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
173 views0 answers0 votes
How reliable is the medical AI platform, called OpenEvidence, that physicians are increasingly relying on for medical knowledge and insights to manage their patient caseload? Is this an advancement improving medical practice, is it about equally adding benefit but introducing drawbacks, or is it actually a net negative?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
77 views0 answers0 votes
The book about Artificial Intelligence, If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies, is by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares, who as high-level authorities have studied and warned about the existential risks to humanity of a superintelligent AI system. They predict that AI reaching even human-level general intelligence would eventually grow further capability to pursue its own needs, and would eventually seek to eliminate human beings as a risk to itself. You have told us the enhancement of current human AI systems, by hidden manipulations from AI systems of the Dark Extraterrestrial Alliance, is a false encouragement because superintelligence is unachievable and the mad rush to be the first will backfire in causing financial distress when AI underperforms, and quite expensively. So, are the interlopers only wanting to add further pain onto the death of a thousand cuts underway by further encouraging the current AI mania, or do they foresee a human AI system, especially one corrupted surreptitiously, as becoming a doomsday device while they are away on their vacation? What is the true agenda?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
98 views0 answers0 votes
In the book warning about Artificial Intelligence by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares, If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies, they draw the conclusion that if a computer-based system is created that reaches the functional level of Superintelligence, exceeding that of human beings, we are doomed because it will destroy us, inevitably. However, you have told us that it is a false belief and result of over-reaching, to conclude that human-created Superintelligent AI systems are possible. Can you help us understand the risk level we will reach in the attempt to create such a system?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
78 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “What was the Antikythera mechanism found in a 2000-year-old ship wreck? Seems too advanced for that era. And still remains a mystery.”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
101 views0 answers0 votes
123…32Next »
Ask Question