DWQA Questions › Tag: culture clash
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Is the Internet watchdog, factually.co, a trustworthy, reliable source of politically and ideologically independent research and reporting about people and events which are controversial? How corrupted might it be by the interlopers?
ClosedNicola asked 10 hours ago • 
6 views0 answers0 votes
The Internet watchdog, factually.co, reported the following about commentator Tucker Carlson making antisemitic statements to his followers: “Tucker Carlson has been repeatedly accused of antisemitism for a series of public statements and interviews spanning at least 2023–2025, including demeaning descriptions of Jewish individuals, platforming Holocaust minimizers and extremists, and promoting tropes about Jewish power and “replacement” that many groups label antisemitic [1] [2] [3]. Carlson and some defenders deny he is antisemitic, arguing he is critiquing Israel or elites rather than Jews as a group, while Jewish organizations, members of Congress and conservative institutions have publicly condemned specific remarks and guest choices [4] [2] [5].” What can Creator tell us about the reasons for this emerging behavior on his part?
ClosedNicola asked 10 hours ago • 
7 views0 answers0 votes
The Internet watchdog, factually.co-reported the following about Candace Owens making anti-Semitic statements to her followers: “Candace Owens has been repeatedly labeled anti-Semitic for a series of public comments and online posts that critics say recycle classic antisemitic tropes — including claims about Jewish control of media and finance, promotion of an antisemitic 19th century text, blood libel adjacencies, and conspiracy links between Jews and historical crimes — made across social media, livestreams, and her shows between 2022–2025 [1] [2] [3]. Those remarks prompted condemnations from Jewish advocacy groups, a break with some conservative institutions and allies, platform enforcement actions, and formal public backlash that frames the pattern as shifting from dog whistle rhetoric to more overt antisemitic conspiracy mongering [4] [5] [6].” What can Creator tell us about the reasons for this emerging behavior on her part?
ClosedNicola asked 10 hours ago • 
7 views0 answers0 votes
The US military conducted a surprise strike at a military base in Venezuela where President Maduro was housed. He and his wife were taken prisoner and transported to New York where Maduro appeared in court, charged with narco-trafficking. There has been much international consternation about the legality of this intrusion. In addition, it is shaking up geopolitical forces as the US now controls the Venezuelan oil supply and is denying sales to Russia and China. Was this move just a law enforcement operation to stop drug smuggling harmful to US citizens, as the US maintains, or is it serving deeper, more sinister motives of the interlopers?
ClosedNicola asked 3 days ago • 
22 views0 answers0 votes
A news story reports that Rep. Neal Dunn (R-Fla.) joined The Epoch Times Senior Editor Jan Jekielek on his show American Thought Leaders to discuss what he considers one of the gravest crimes of our time: the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) state-sanctioned forced organ harvesting. “I’m one of the few members of Congress who’ve ever actually done transplant surgery,” Dunn said. “I understand a lot of it is coming near and dear to my heart, and the idea of actually murdering someone—to take their organs and give them to somebody else—that is as appalling as anything that anybody’s ever done in the history of the world. That’s right up there with the Nazis and the Holocaust.” A surgeon by training and a member of the House Select Committee on the CCP, Dunn has made combating China’s forced organ harvesting one of his top priorities… For over two decades, mounting evidence has indicated that prisoners of conscience in China, particularly adherents of Falun Gong—a spiritual practice persecuted in China since 1999—have been killed on demand for their organs. Independent tribunals, human rights investigators, and medical experts have documented thousands of cases, estimating that tens of thousands of transplants occur each year without identifiable voluntary donors. “Now they advertise that you can actually make an appointment sitting in America for a heart/lung transplant in China right now, but I want to make that illegal,” Dunn said. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
68 views0 answers0 votes
As of July 2024, ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) reported that 662,566 noncitizens with criminal backgrounds are on its national docket, with 435,719 convicted criminals among them. Their crimes include tens of thousands of homicides and sexual assaults. As expected, this large number of criminals among the migrants freely roaming America is being largely ignored by the media. Are these figures accurate, and can you explain why this is happening and how it fits into the big picture?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
316 views0 answers0 votes
It has been observed that many people genuinely fear information that has been deemed by their consensus to be dangerous, to the extent that they risk exile and banishment (or worse) if they even reveal that they know something they shouldn’t. Not unlike discovering that the car you’re driving is a stolen one, or that you are a carrier of a deadly virus. But the dilemma is, once you are exposed to information, it is very difficult to unsee it, and so people go to great lengths to avoid being exposed if they can help it. This creates some remarkable “gymnastics” at times. Can Creator comment?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
587 views0 answers0 votes
Placing one’s full allegiance with a consensus, and making consensus approval their top criterion for conducting their lives means that consensus acceptance can be more important than facts or truth—to the extreme extent of people not believing their own eyes, or ignoring fundamental standards of fairness and decency they learned at age five. Can Creator share the karmic hazards of living this way?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
614 views0 answers0 votes
It would seem that one of the core operating principles of effective mind control manipulation is to win people’s obedience to a consensus, by simply controlling the content of that consensus. Controlling the content of a consensus can frequently be done with simple, repeated propaganda. And yet, so few people seem to recognize just how easily a consensus can be socially engineered and manipulated. They are certainly made aware this happens, especially when it’s pointed out to them in an obvious way. Yet they continue to resist. How much stress does shutting out this awareness cause, and how damaging can it be?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
692 views0 answers0 votes
Gaining wisdom would seem to be the proper way to graduate from consensus thinking—knowing the truth but having enough awareness that putting it on full display can be hazardous to one’s health. Can Creator share how prayer work and the Lightworker Healing Protocol can help every human obtain that wisdom in the least painful and traumatic way possible?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
650 views0 answers0 votes
Ask Question