DWQA Questions › Tag: deep subconscious mind
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A recent episode of the television program Paranormal Caught on Camera, on 4-5-26, showed video taken on June 14th, 2025, of what many are convinced was a sign from heaven. It was a strange cloud formation near a local church in Naga City, the Philippines, that looked like the tip of a horizontal cloud was turned upward by 90 degrees to resemble a standing image of Christ with arms outstretched. This was observed during an event at the basilica hosting hundreds of youth who were there to worship. Was this just a fluke, an example of observer bias, or something genuinely special of divine significance?
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
20 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer writes: “I felt ill yesterday. I was weak, achy, and felt the discomfort of having a fever, including chills, but my body temperature was not at all elevated. Today, all those symptoms are gone and I feel like myself again. What happened?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
16 views0 answers0 votes
You have told us that 94% of physical illnesses, including those which are chronic and diagnosable because of measurable pathologic changes, are karmic in origin. What percent of physical illnesses are a karmic rumbling of cellular memory, a partial recreation of a prior malady that is a resemblance, but not always diagnosable, formally?
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
17 views0 answers0 votes
Are symptoms arising from cellular memory due to karmic rumblings, less dangerous in terms of potential severity of the consequences? Are there risks in ignoring such potential warnings? Can you give us a tutorial to help us understand the dynamics and the significance in what we experience?
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
15 views0 answers0 votes
Can amyloidosis be caused by a chronic virus, and if so, in what percent of cases?
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
11 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “High blood pressure is conventionally regarded as a health risk and that lowering it reduces risk, especially in moderate-to-severe systolic BP of 140-159 mmHg. Dr. Malcolm Kendrick author of Doctoring Data claims that cardiovascular risk increases more steeply after systolic BP reaches around 160-170 mmHg—well beyond the 140/90 threshold often used to diagnose and treat hypertension. A rule of thumb in medicine is that for older individuals, a systolic BP of around 100 + age is a reasonable upper limit beyond which cardiovascular risks increase significantly. Is hypertension over-treated, given that aggressively lowering blood pressure—especially in older individuals—can be harmful?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
19 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “A 2018 book, Medical Nihilism, by Jacob Stegenga claims the healthcare system over-adopts treatments and under-recognizes risks. He states confidence in the effectiveness of medical interventions should be low because empirical evidence for the efficacy of many treatments is weak due to methodological flaws, publication bias, the influence of commercial interests. He claims positive studies are more likely to be published, screening programs tend to detect and treat cancers that would never cause harm, common treatments can cause long-term complications, short trial durations miss long-term harms etc. How accurate is his view that evidence is systematically skewed and harms are undercounted?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
17 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Dr. Bernard Lown, a Harvard cardiologist in the 1980s, criticized the rapid rise of surgical Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts (CABG), noting 20–40% were potentially avoidable, especially in stable angina, and many patients had uncertain survival benefit. He advocated medical therapy—nitrates, beta-blockers, lifestyle changes—for symptom control. How accurate is it to say that in 2026, evidence-based guidelines and trials have reduced avoidable CABG to <10% for high-risk, guideline-selected patients, and that for low-risk, stable patients, surgery rarely improves survival, and that beta-blockers, nitrates, ACE inhibitors, lifestyle changes are to be preferred?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
16 views0 answers0 votes
Was there a reason I encountered, on the sidewalk as I reached my property, a large, perfect, fall-colored maple leaf that was perfectly intact and quite beautiful despite the date being well into spring? The trees in my neighborhood shed their leaves last fall, and were raked up or mulched months ago. Was it just a coincidence or something more special?
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
8 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “A 2012 paper in the British Medical Journal “Use of relative and absolute effect measures in reporting health inequalities” concluded that “75% (258/344) [of 2009 papers] reported only relative effect measures.” Absolute risk reduction is often far less impressive and less often stated. This suggests that physicians will overestimate the efficacy of treatments and patients may have a misplaced belief in both effectiveness and risks. To what extent does this practice mislead patients and clinicians and benefit pharmaceutical manufacturers?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
10 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “In her February 2026 channeling of The Pleiadians, Barbara Marciniak says that all information on our human ancestors is in our DNA. She says that by thinking in a relaxed way (alpha brain state) we open a gateway to ancient memories and this is how humans can discover solutions to be grounded, centered, clear, and empowered in the chaotic times ahead. Can Creator elaborate on what she meant and if the LHP request to “awaken, amplify and bring into our current life and awareness all the skills, gifts, powers, and access to higher states, from any past, future, and parallel lives” will have the effects she states? Does this request need to be more explicit?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
17 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Dr. Malcolm Kendrick in his book, Doctoring Data, suggests more patients are harmed by over-treatment than helped. He claims published treatment benefits are often exaggerated by hiding behind relative risk (to mask how tiny most benefits are), selective reporting (such as statistical significance without meaningful benefit), or clever framing (such as natural variation in cholesterol or blood pressure) is medicalized as a treatable condition. To what extent is published medical research actually the fabricated appearance of scientific rigor to sell a product?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
10 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “What percentage of patients take drugs for almost no real benefit, even while risking side effects and penalized by the cost?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
12 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “I’d like to check in on my thyroid issue. Via you, Creator told me it was viral in origin. I did the three-week ivermectin and hydrochloroquine treatment, as advised. As well as taking supplements of the Antiviral Regimen. I would like to know if I’m virus-free. My thyroid is no longer swollen and I feel much better overall.” What can we tell her?
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
10 views0 answers0 votes
She asks: “Could you check with Creator if my thyroid is healthy again? Or do I need to take another three-week treatment of ivermectin and hydrochloroquine?” What can we tell her?
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
11 views0 answers0 votes
123…192Next »
Ask Question