DWQA Questions › Tag: divine consciousness
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Why do spirit meddlers bother to attach to food or beverages in stores rather than just wait for food to be prepared and then attach while it is being served? That would seem to be much more of a sure thing for getting into a human being, as so much unsold food is discarded. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
21 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “We have learned from Creator that synthetic vitamins do not carry the same power of consciousness or benefits as naturally produced vitamins. – Would it be possible for synthetic vitamin C for example to adopt the properties/vibrations of natural Vitamin C molecules in Orange Juice, when both are mixed? What can Creator tell us?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
19 views0 answers0 votes
Do spirit meddlers attach to wine and liquor bottles, or even bottled water, in order to reach and be ingested by unwary drinkers?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
25 views0 answers0 votes
Is the problem of spirit attachments in grocery items significant enough to warrant adding a specific request to the Lightworker Healing Protocol for them to be cleared?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
20 views0 answers0 votes
You confirmed a viewer’s suspicion he had picked up a spirit meddler attachment from eating sausages that were tainted energetically. Is this a common phenomenon akin to what you have described with marijuana, that spirit meddlers follow the harvested plants through the distribution chain, because they know when the user imbibes the drug, they will be able to penetrate the auric defenses and obtain a foothold within the energy of the victim? Can ingesting tainted food internalize dark spirits attached to it? Is this yet another reason to use our recommended meal prayer of protection?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
21 views0 answers0 votes
Recently, you told us: “GMO foods are, indeed, not only unnatural but a kind of menace because they inherently contain a dark intention that underlies the use of that technology to begin with. It is originating and being orchestrated by the Extraterrestrial Alliance, and that is the source of a large body of negative conscious influence right there.” Help us understand better the nature of that negative conscious influence. Is it some kind of technology, like an energy weapon or artificial consciousness, or simply negative thought forms?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
23 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “When I was under psychic attack I did relatively well until I made the mistake to buy some sausages from the grocery store that seemed to be tainted. After ingestion, my auric shielding was damaged. Through finger-strength testing I was able to get an answer. Not the nanotech, but some dark spirits attached to the food damaged my aura. And now I wonder whether the main purpose of GMO food is to weaken the auric shielding of humans so spirit meddlers have an easier time attaching. The cancer-causing effects of GMO seem to be just a secondary side effect.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
160 views0 answers0 votes
Themistocles (thuh·mist-uh·kleez) said: “I have with me two gods, Persuasion and Compulsion.” Jenny Mollen said, “I think the power of persuasion would be the greatest superpower of all time.” Aesop said, “Persuasion is often more effectual than force.” And James Altucher (All-tuh-chur) said, “Most people don’t have the power of persuasion.” Does this explain why so many turn to compulsion instead? What is Creator’s perspective on persuasion versus coercion, and persuasion as a superpower?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
109 views0 answers0 votes
How much of the power of persuasion is a product of divinely bestowed soul attributes, versus a learned skill that one acquires through trial and error over many lifetimes? If a learned skill, how is that skill transferred from lifetime to lifetime? Is it recorded in the akashic records and made part of cellular memory during the fetus’s formation? Or is it something wholly spiritual in nature, retained by the spirit itself, and if one learns the power of persuasion while incarnated, are their newly discovered persuasive powers on display in the light between lives as genuine learning? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
84 views0 answers0 votes
Persuasion is the power to effect CHANGE or perhaps prevent change. And even though there is a distinction made between persuasion and compulsion, the threat of compulsion can, in and of itself, be HIGHLY persuasive. The iconic fire and brimstone sermons delivered with great theatrics by eloquent ministers comes to mind. A “fear monger” or one who “peddles fear” also comes to mind. What is Creator’s perspective of persuasion AS compulsion?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
127 views0 answers0 votes
It’s interesting to note that the iconic “snake oil salesman” never had a storefront, like a pharmacy, but instead pulled into the town square with his wagon and hawked his magical products directly to the crowds, and then often “hightailed it” to the next town before the truth of his products became more widely known. Google defined snake oil salesmen as those who deceived people in order to get money from them. The successful ones were highly persuasive people. When one has such ability, it seems so puzzling that such a person could not find a “legitimate” avenue in which to practice those skills and be successful without all the ignominy. Good salespeople are in demand everywhere and for everything—why resort to fraud? What can Creator tell us about exploiting the masterful use of persuasion to willfully engage in fraud?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
108 views0 answers0 votes
When one does a study of some of the most effective salespeople, one often encounters a mixed bag of ethically questionable tactics. One extremely successful car salesman would sit down with a phone book, call people and tell them their new car was ready for pickup. When people inevitably said, “I didn’t order a car,” he would profusely apologize and then immediately segue into asking them if they were at all in the market for a new car. With this approach, he made a fortune and set the world record at the time for most non-fleet sales made by a car salesman “one customer at a time.” Now to his credit, he was extremely likable, attentive, thorough, and did great customer service, sent birthday cards to his customers, etc. Nevertheless, a lot of his success was predicated on a lie and deception. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
72 views0 answers0 votes
In reference to the above car salesman’s success, he was successful because he was good at “cold calling” which most people have a deep aversion to. Cold calling is one of the most obvious breaches of the “Golden Rule” there is. Almost everyone HATES getting cold calls, and yet most successful salespeople will assert that you need to do it in order to be successful. Brian remembers one “boiler room” telephone canvasser who bragged how she abused anyone cold calling her but had no problem doing cold calling for a living. The stark hypocrisy was dramatic and utterly remorseless and unapologetic. She literally thought it was “hilarious” and laughed about it. Brian found it disturbing, to say the least. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
94 views0 answers0 votes
Cold calling works precisely because so many people have an aversion to doing it. That alone makes it a successful strategy for those who can bring themselves to do it. Brian did sales in the late 80s and struggled with this dilemma. A rule of thumb is it takes 10 calls to get a lead, 10 leads to get an appointment, and 10 appointments to get a sale. Brian demonstrated to himself that, indeed, the formula works and managed to get a house listing as a result. But rather than being encouraged by his success, he was so overcome with guilt about disturbing people eating dinner that he eventually abandoned sales as a career altogether. Cold calling cannot work if everyone does it. Everyone’s phone would ring all day long and it would be utterly chaotic and untenable. There is the idea that, if “everyone” can’t, then maybe no one “should?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
141 views0 answers0 votes
Another successful sales guru made a fortune selling heavy stainless steel cookware door to door. (A direct form of cold calling that predates the telephone). He frequently recounted one sale he made where the woman initially slammed the front door on him and, in response, he went around to the back door to apologize for knocking on the front door. He was so charming and disarming, that the woman felt bad about mistreating him and consented to listening to his presentation as a way to make amends. She ended up buying the very expensive cookware he was selling. We are confronted with the dilemma of his apology being “insincere,” because he certainly felt no remorse about knocking on her front door at all, much less her back door after she made it clear she didn’t want to interact with him. What is Creator’s perspective on this anecdote, and what positive and negative divine lessons can we learn from it?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
72 views0 answers0 votes
123…8Next »
Ask Question