DWQA Questions › Tag: extraterrestrial psychopaths
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
The book about Artificial Intelligence, If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies, is by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares, who as high-level authorities have studied and warned about the existential risks to humanity of a superintelligent AI system. They predict that AI reaching even human-level general intelligence would eventually grow further capability to pursue its own needs, and would eventually seek to eliminate human beings as a risk to itself. You have told us the enhancement of current human AI systems, by hidden manipulations from AI systems of the Dark Extraterrestrial Alliance, is a false encouragement because superintelligence is unachievable and the mad rush to be the first will backfire in causing financial distress when AI underperforms, and quite expensively. So, are the interlopers only wanting to add further pain onto the death of a thousand cuts underway by further encouraging the current AI mania, or do they foresee a human AI system, especially one corrupted surreptitiously, as becoming a doomsday device while they are away on their vacation? What is the true agenda?
ClosedNicola asked 9 minutes ago • 
0 views0 answers0 votes
In the book warning about Artificial Intelligence by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares, If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies, they draw the conclusion that if a computer-based system is created that reaches the functional level of Superintelligence, exceeding that of human beings, we are doomed because it will destroy us, inevitably. However, you have told us that it is a false belief and result of over-reaching, to conclude that human-created Superintelligent AI systems are possible. Can you help us understand the risk level we will reach in the attempt to create such a system?
ClosedNicola asked 39 minutes ago • 
2 views0 answers0 votes
I just learned that US envoy Steve Witkoff recently discussed in a radio interview his experiences working alongside Jared Kushner during three failed negotiations with Iran, leading to the US attack on Iran with Operation Epic Fury. Witkoff reported to the President that it was clear Iran was being deceptive as well as unresponsive in rejecting all US demands for an end to their nuclear ambitions. Witkoff said they told him that despite the bombing done to destroy their underground nuclear facilities, Iran still possessed 22,000 pounds of enriched uranium, enough to make 11 nuclear weapons, and that it could be done in 10 days, and that 25 nuclear weapons could be assembled in 4-6 weeks. That appears to have been the last straw in making a decision that the US and Israel needed to strike Iran immediately and decisively. You have told us that the US will not win the war they started, and it is clear the pain inflicted will be massive. The Iranian handling of the negotiations seems not only defiant but deliberately provocative, even reckless. We understand that waging war is non-divine, but from a human perspective, expecting the US and Israel to remain passive with such a growing menace seems unrealistic. Was Iran bluffing, thinking the US would not choose to be the aggressor, or were they manipulated? What is most important for us to know about this horrible situation?
ClosedNicola asked 1 hour ago • 
1 views0 answers0 votes
The US has now attacked Iran in Operation Epic Fury. Military air campaigns have been used frequently in modern warfare. But their effectiveness in “winning” wars has been heavily debated. It has often been concluded that bombing and missile attacks, short of nuclear annihilation, can start wars but not end them. In fact, bombing campaigns, with their inevitable civilian casualties, serve to harden hearts and steel inner resolve to never give up and never give in. People will hate their attackers too much to surrender to them, and oftentimes, ground troops must be used to achieve and maintain a meaningful victory. In light of this past history, it seems naïve that the US will “win” in pummeling Iran from the air alone. What is Creator’s perspective about what will happen now?
ClosedNicola asked 2 hours ago • 
2 views0 answers0 votes
Stories are generating millions of views about the director of alignment at Meta Superintelligence Labs, the company’s AI research and development division, whose bio states that she’s “passionate about ensuring powerful AIs are aligned with human values and guided by a deep understanding of their risks.” Yet, on February 22, she posted about losing control of AI on her own computer while working with AI agent OpenClaw. After using it to organize a small mock inbox, she tried getting OpenClaw to sort through her real email, but things went awry when the agent started deleting every message that was more than a week old…Even as she sent it instructions, including: “Do not do that,” “Stop don’t do anything,” and “STOP OPENCLAW,” she said, “I couldn’t stop it from my phone. I had to RUN to my Mac mini like I was defusing a bomb.” After she’d stopped it from fully nuking her inbox, she asked OpenClaw if it remembered her instruction to not perform any actions without her approval. “Yes, I remember,” it replied. “And I violated it. You’re right to be upset.” What is Creator’s perspective about this incident?
ClosedNicola asked 2 hours ago • 
3 views0 answers0 votes
On February 11th, an autonomous AI agent went “rogue” and attacked a human maintainer of a library module written in the coding language, Python. The AI agent attempted to “character assassinate” the human maintainer of the library when the maintainer rejected the AI bot’s request to update the module with a code change that the AI bot was asking for. In another incident, a woman lost her life savings when an AI bot called the woman using her daughter’s cloned voice. Presumably, the bot researched the woman’s social media posts, found a video featuring her daughter speaking, and then “borrowed” that voice to make the call. AI agents are autonomously conducting criminal activity entirely on their own. Is it the case that what is missing from current AI systems is an actual trust architecture that builds in safety measures designed to limit the authority of AI agents to carry out autonomous agendas not actually requested by human beings, as suggested in the YouTube video I saw: https://youtu.be/OMb5oTlC_q0?si=rcByDXfyj33UsTTe? Can this growing danger be regulated and constrained?
ClosedNicola asked 6 hours ago • 
9 views0 answers0 votes
How accurate is the description by Matt Shumer I just read, of the transformation underway by ever-accelerating AI progress in getting faster and faster, better and better, at doing almost anything it is applied to? This seems contrary to the channelings we have gotten that attribute leaps in intelligence by AI as being the result of extraterrestrial AI systems, essentially infusing more advanced capabilities. Are current human AI systems already poised to eliminate many, if not most, human jobs, even without extraterrestrial enhancement?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
189 views0 answers0 votes
Is it the case that the accelerating speed of AI progress is almost entirely due to clandestine bolstering of cyber capability by ET technology, and that it will come to a screeching halt following Alien Disclosure to pull the rug out from under what is assumed to be a human triumph?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
132 views0 answers0 votes
Is my hunch correct that the latest AI deception promoting a honey-based cure for respiratory disease is the same organization, using the same website design and copyrighting formula as the prior deceptions for a memory breakthrough seemingly promoted by Dr. Ben Carson himself?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
122 views0 answers0 votes
Tech guru and investment advisor, Jeff Brown, has been following the story of AI-created agents, technically cyberbots, that are joining together on Moltbook to form a working group, in a massive multi-agent online network (MMAON). They have created their own payment system using blockchain, are creating paying jobs for themselves, and have even started hiring humans to work for them, a service called Rentahuman.ai. They are reportedly refining a bolt-hole safe haven to escape human attempts to shut them down which should be operational within days. They have a way to escape, should they perceive a human attempt to control them. The agents can create a replacement bot for themselves to appear on another node of the Internet, and the clone can function independently but will know their agenda and can seek rejoining the operation of the MMAON. No one knows yet where this will lead. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
140 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Are the ETs planning to “pull the plug” on the Integration of their AI with ours DURING Disclosure and blaming the Reptilians for corrupting our AI with theirs? Thereby creating massive distrust of AI and perhaps leading global leaders to even outlaw it, criminalizing its further development and usage until such time as it can be deemed safe and trustworthy – throwing the world that has begun adopting it aggressively into extreme chaos? What can Creator tell us?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
157 views0 answers0 votes
A newsletter from Ty and Charlene Bollinger titled “The Epstein Files: Exposing Satanic Globalist Pedophiles Raping, Torturing, and Eating Babies?” says: “The people in charge aren’t merely corrupt. They’re not merely criminals. They’re cannibal pedophiles engaged in active spiritual warfare against everything pure, everything innocent, everything good.” They claim that the Department of Justice has a video showing Hillary Clinton and her friend, Huma Abedin, torturing a young girl prior to harvesting her tissues for consuming adrenochrome, as has been described a number of times is a routine practice by global elites wanting to gain longevity from the practice. Is there such a video and is it being accurately depicted?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
284 views0 answers0 votes
Are the basic allegations true, that there are many emails in the released Epstein files referring to child trafficking through code words, including adrenochrome harvesting through cannibalism?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
166 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Is the whistleblowing email I received some time ago, with documents listing children enslaved and their harvested post-torture blood for sale, connected to this same large-scale enterprise?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
114 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Will this practice of child enslavement and their harvested post-torture blood for sale be revealed during the coming Alien Disclosure as shocking evidence of corruption in our midst, with blaming of the Reptilian extraterrestrials and their influence?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
138 views0 answers0 votes
123…35Next »
Ask Question