DWQA Questions › Tag: extraterrestrial technologyFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesThere is a good joke that’s been around for a while, but it’s especially pertinent when it comes to evaluating AI: “It must be true, I read it on the Internet.” Everyone knows this means it’s more likely not to be true. But when it comes to AI, almost everything it “knows” comes from the Internet. And because it tends to weigh true and false by frequency of encounter, the more AI encounters the same images, assertions, statements, treatments, opinions, etc., the more statistically weighted it will be. The term, “There’s safety in numbers,” comes to mind in that the idea is, the more frequently something is encountered, the more genuine it probably is. This becomes AI’s “default assumption” about the material it is trained with. It can only utilize, evaluate, and regurgitate the material it is trained with. This turned out to be quite a problem early on because the sheer amount of racist, violent, and derogatory material on the Internet was not fully appreciated until AI started digesting it. It became necessary to employ untold thousands of low-paid (on the order of two dollars a day) “content evaluators,” mostly in third-world countries, to filter out gore, hate speech, child sexual abuse material, and pornographic images. If AI read it on the Internet, it must be true? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • Problems in Society232 views0 answers0 votesThe authors of The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want wrote: “With LLMs (large language models), the situation is even worse than garbage in/garbage out – they will make paper-mache out of their training data, mushing it up and remixing it into new forms that don’t preserve the communicative intent of original data. Paper-mache made out of good data is still paper-mache.” They also write: “This is why we like to call language models (like popular chatbots) ‘synthetic text extruding machines.'” They also write: “In the case of language modeling, the correct answer of which word came next is just whatever word happened to come next in the training corpus. … So if (popular chatbots) are nothing more than souped-up autocomplete, why are so many people convinced that it’s actually ‘understanding’ and ‘reasoning?'” Why indeed? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • Problems in Society145 views0 answers0 votesPropaganda has always been a huge problem, but may be an even bigger issue for AI. China and the Chinese Communist Party spend more money and effort, and engage more of its citizens to spread blatantly false propaganda, than perhaps the rest of the world combined. To such an extent that it felt the need to create its very own global social media platform, TikTok. The Trump administration has even proposed banning TikTok altogether because of the nefarious role the platform plays in both gathering intelligence and spreading propaganda. Some of the lies people are starting to believe about China, that it has no crime, that its infrastructure is some of the most advanced and safest in the world, that there are no homeless people in China, that everyone there has a meaningful and lucrative job, that they are the healthiest and happiest people on the planet, and on and on. When, in fact, the exact opposite is more often than not the case. And for every good lie they tell about themselves, they tell an equally bad one about America and Europe. The problem is, they are so prolific and extreme with this propaganda that the Chinese people themselves believe none of it (about themselves, anyway), and Americans and Europeans (especially young ones) are beginning to believe all of it. With AI having no way to filter this for truth or falsity other than volume, there appears to be a genuine danger of AI itself presenting this propaganda as gospel truth, that China is great and America and Europe are evil. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • Problems in Society254 views0 answers0 votesThe authors of AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference, suggest that the track record of AI used for predicting social outcomes is so abysmally bad that it may actually amount to fraud. They write: “In short, some existing limits to predictability could be overcome with more and better data, while others seem intrinsic (built in and unfixable). In some cases, such as cultural products (like resume scanning AI, or AI used to decide who gets social benefits), we don’t expect predictability to get much better at all. In others, such as predicting individuals’ life outcomes, there could be some improvements but not drastic changes. Unfortunately, this hasn’t stopped companies from selling AI for making consequential decisions about people by predicting their future. So it is important to resist AI snake oil that’s already in wide use today rather than passively hope that predictive AI technology will get better.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • Problems in Society155 views0 answers0 votesThe authors of both books [The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want and AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference] were not the least bit concerned that AI presented an immediate or near-term existential threat to humanity in any way, shape, or form, despite copious media hype to the contrary. All the authors, on the other hand, were VERY concerned about the misuse of AI to reduce our freedom and agency to choose for ourselves, to retain the rights to our creative outputs, and even to have recourse when AI decides wrongly (which they assert it is guaranteed to do). Can Creator tell us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are the best ways to combat the danger and encroachment of AI in our lives?ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • Problems in Society156 views0 answers0 votesHas there been any change in the ET planned sequence for the financial collapse triggered by the tidal power outages, then gold reset, then Alien Disclosure, and then withdrawal of the interlopers?ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • Extraterrestrial Agenda296 views0 answers0 votesDoes it look like the financial collapse, tidal power outages, gold reset, and then Alien Disclosure will start soon now, or has there been a significant delay for some reason since I last asked about this?ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • Extraterrestrial Agenda377 views0 answers0 votesYou have told us a major reason for the delays in not yet seeing the tidal power outages, gold reset, and Alien Disclosure is to plan and execute a truly major financial collapse as a painful motivation for human acceptance of the Alien Disclosure with their deceptive offer to help. Is an additional reason for extra time being needed that they want to feel smug and secure while they take their temporary break in withdrawing from our world, knowing we will be decimated and suffering, ideally, the whole time they are on a multi-year vacation? That might well require much more detailed planning and orchestration to optimize. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • Extraterrestrial Agenda269 views0 answers0 votesA news report states: “Fuel control switches for the engines of an Air India flight that crashed last month were moved from the ‘run’ to the ‘cutoff’ position moments before impact, starving both engines of fuel, a preliminary investigation report said early Saturday. The report, issued by India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau, also indicated that both pilots were confused over the change to the switch setting, which caused a loss of engine thrust shortly after takeoff. The Air India flight—a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner—crashed on June 12 and killed at least 260 people, including 19 on the ground, in the northwestern city of Ahmedabad. Only one passenger survived the crash, which is one of India’s worst aviation disasters… Aviation expert and former airline pilot Terry Tozer said the engine cutoff switches being switched to off only seconds after takeoff was ‘absolutely bizarre. Unfortunately, the altitude was so low that the engines were only beginning to recover and they didn’t have enough time,’ Tozer told Sky News. The report also indicated confusion in the cockpit moments before the crash. In the flight’s final moment, one pilot was heard on the cockpit voice recorder asking the other why he cut off the fuel. ‘The other pilot responded that he did not do so,’ the report said.” Who turned off the flow of fuel to the engines and why?ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • Extraterrestrial Agenda169 views0 answers0 votesOver 100 deaths have been reported from devastating floods in Kerr County, Texas, including 27 children and a counselor at Camp Mystic, where about 700 girls were camping at the center of the heavy rains. The search for bodies is still ongoing in the region as of July 10, 2025, with over 100 still missing. Was this a natural or sinister weather event? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • Extraterrestrial Agenda165 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “Having listened to an “Alien Agenda Update” from months ago it was said that the ETs are only going to retreat in case ET disclosure happens. Does that mean that prayers directed to a prevention of ET disclosure won’t be followed up on by the divine? Given that people are so programmed humanity is going to accept the ETs quite certainly which would lead to annihilation. What should our prayers focus on after ET disclosure happens in order to save humanity? Wouldn’t it be safer to prevent ET disclosure and the ETs staying here instead of them retreating?” Can you help clarify once again, the main agenda items that the interlopers want to happen and what is unavoidable, so prayer power is not being misdirected?ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • Human Potential313 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “Would it be helpful to pray to you, Creator, to not only replace all self-limiting beliefs but to be open to and be inspired by beliefs that are positive, powerful, and the most helpful in fostering our highest alignment with Creator in the safest and quickest way for all levels of the mind? Or would this be an addition we could make to the LHP if we are interested in that for ourselves? How can we cultivate beliefs that are shaped and constructed by higher truth to serve us? What can Source Creator share with us regarding guiding the improvement of our beliefs?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • Limiting Beliefs154 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “Is Artificial Intelligence (AI) fully an ET creation? Or did some form of ancient AI exist before the creation of physical ETs and affect them somehow? Is there any other origin of AI from another timeline, dimension, or reality affecting ETs that is also affecting humanity? How important will Organic Intelligence from nature and humanity and the divine be in coming times with Artificial Intelligence on the rise (before Ascension perhaps)?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control291 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Creator, if we are subjected to self-limiting beliefs from interloper mind control, can you tell us if there are positive expanding beliefs we could suggest to ourselves to counter them? Beliefs like, “I am unlimited.” Could you give us an example or guide to picking them and how they could be implemented effectively?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • Limiting Beliefs291 views0 answers0 votesA viewer writes: “I keep my cell phone either on my bedside table or in the living room to check for snoring issues overnight on airplane mode. Not sure how dangerous that is or how protected I am. This is not just about me, of course, because many people are doing this, as I’m sure you know.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • Extraterrestrial Agenda294 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola