DWQA Questions › Tag: final solution
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
We have shared comments about the paper in JAMA blowing the whistle on medical dangers, in pointing out that the U.S. healthcare system was the third leading cause of death in America (Starfield, B. Is US health really the best in the world? JAMA 2000 284:483-5). Things continue to raise questions. I just saw a citation of an editorial by Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet, one of the world’s top medical journals, published in 2015 in which he says: “The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.” While this is largely focused on the pressures to publish because of the vested interests of researchers, as well as journal editors, is there a deeper reason that quality and integrity suffer?
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
26 views0 answers0 votes
The stock market continues its bullish trend, reaching all-time highs again this week. We just saw a financial adviser predict gasoline would reach $10.00 a gallon and that many supermarket shelves would be empty because of coming shortages. Was that just exaggerated pessimism, or an accurate forecast given current plans of the Extraterrestrial Alliance to cause a financial collapse? If accurate, what can you tell us about when the downturn will start?
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
35 views0 answers0 votes
It is almost at the end of April. What can you tell me about the time remaining until the tidal power outages, if that is still the plan?
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
37 views0 answers0 votes
The 2026 PEMF Buyer’s Guide from BryantMeyers.com criticizes a “popular PEMF expert (we’ll call him Dr. P)” for both miscalculating the Inverse Square Law and failing to realize different devices use different size coils, so a different chart is needed for each. Is that Dr. William Pawluk being referred to? Are his recommendations unreliable due to the mischaracterization of energies?
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
29 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Creator has created our universe and a number of parallel universes. How many parallel universes are there? What is their purpose? Are they different from each other from a dimensional or future extension view point? For instance, do I exist in these parallel universes as different versions of myself? Can Creator give us a tutorial on this subject within the limited framework of our human understanding, or do we lack the vocabulary to comprehend?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
43 views0 answers0 votes
Jim Rickards wrote in an editorial on April 13, 2026: “Trump only has three options regarding the war in Iran. He can declare victory and go home. However, Iran could continue the war and would control the Strait of Hormuz. Energy prices would remain high. The second option is to keep bombing and wait for regime change in Iran. That’s also a losing strategy. It’s already clear there will not be regime change. The third course is escalation – exactly what Trump is doing. Iran recently announced they were setting up a toll booth at the Strait of Hormuz. Only Iran-approved vessels could transit. And those vessels had to pay a toll charge. The U.S. Navy won’t escort vessels through the Strait because the risk of losing a ship is too great. Instead, Trump is implementing his own naval blockade further out to sea. If a vessel makes it through the Strait (with Iranian permission), it and its oil will be seized by the U.S. Iran is acting like a Mafia extortionist. The U.S. Navy is acting like Caribbean pirates. Either way, no oil gets through. Get ready for $10 gas at the pump. Get ready for a global recession. And get ready for more escalation. It’s Trump’s only remaining card.” Is this a perceptive analysis and prediction of what the future holds, and is it being orchestrated by the Extraterrestrial Alliance?
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
40 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “In his 1970s book, Medical Nemesis, Ivan Illich suggests medicine isn’t the primary reason people survive illness; sanitation, nutrition, and housing matter more. He goes on to say over-treatment and exaggeration of disease are widespread, that healthcare fosters dependency, and that illness is seen as unacceptable. Healthcare often operates less for the benefit of patients and more to serve political, social, or bureaucratic interests – public image, economic concerns, or voter approval over medical advice. His views jarred badly with me. Is it right to say, in 2026, that people avoid confronting mortality and that modern healthcare is more about socio-political optics than illnesses?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
31 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “An overlooked aspect of modern medicine is perhaps that now normal human experiences—such as minor stress, aging, ‘high’ blood pressure, ‘high’ cholesterol, or childbirth—are labeled as medical problems that require professional intervention. Society has arguably become increasingly dependent on doctors and healthcare institutions, losing confidence in self-care and mutual support. Medical institutions now dictate social norms, defining what is ‘normal’ or ‘deviant,’ and expanding their authority into everyday life. Is this intended to weaken society’s resilience, creating a population that depends on the medical system for a ‘pharmaceutical invasion’ and even the conception of who is ‘ill?'”
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
29 views0 answers0 votes
Has there been any change in the interloper agenda to trigger a market drawdown by launching tidal power outages in the US, causing blackouts for days, followed by a gold reset, and then the long-planned Alien Disclosure with a deceptive offer to help humanity?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
222 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “High blood pressure is conventionally regarded as a health risk and that lowering it reduces risk, especially in moderate-to-severe systolic BP of 140-159 mmHg. Dr. Malcolm Kendrick author of Doctoring Data claims that cardiovascular risk increases more steeply after systolic BP reaches around 160-170 mmHg—well beyond the 140/90 threshold often used to diagnose and treat hypertension. A rule of thumb in medicine is that for older individuals, a systolic BP of around 100 + age is a reasonable upper limit beyond which cardiovascular risks increase significantly. Is hypertension over-treated, given that aggressively lowering blood pressure—especially in older individuals—can be harmful?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
142 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “A 2018 book, Medical Nihilism, by Jacob Stegenga claims the healthcare system over-adopts treatments and under-recognizes risks. He states confidence in the effectiveness of medical interventions should be low because empirical evidence for the efficacy of many treatments is weak due to methodological flaws, publication bias, the influence of commercial interests. He claims positive studies are more likely to be published, screening programs tend to detect and treat cancers that would never cause harm, common treatments can cause long-term complications, short trial durations miss long-term harms etc. How accurate is his view that evidence is systematically skewed and harms are undercounted?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
121 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Dr. Bernard Lown, a Harvard cardiologist in the 1980s, criticized the rapid rise of surgical Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts (CABG), noting 20–40% were potentially avoidable, especially in stable angina, and many patients had uncertain survival benefit. He advocated medical therapy—nitrates, beta-blockers, lifestyle changes—for symptom control. How accurate is it to say that in 2026, evidence-based guidelines and trials have reduced avoidable CABG to <10% for high-risk, guideline-selected patients, and that for low-risk, stable patients, surgery rarely improves survival, and that beta-blockers, nitrates, ACE inhibitors, lifestyle changes are to be preferred?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
113 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Creator, many Christian Pastors who are big into miracles are across the board stating that there is going to be a coming deception where aliens are going to claim being our saviors, only they are truly “demonic entities.” Is this prophetic warning close enough to the truth that it will benefit the Divine in helping people not side with darkness after the disclosure? Or will many Christians still be at risk of manipulation because of blind spots in this prophecy?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
267 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “A 2012 paper in the British Medical Journal “Use of relative and absolute effect measures in reporting health inequalities” concluded that “75% (258/344) [of 2009 papers] reported only relative effect measures.” Absolute risk reduction is often far less impressive and less often stated. This suggests that physicians will overestimate the efficacy of treatments and patients may have a misplaced belief in both effectiveness and risks. To what extent does this practice mislead patients and clinicians and benefit pharmaceutical manufacturers?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
70 views0 answers0 votes
You have reassured us that we need not worry whether our protocol efforts administering sessions with the Lightworker Healing Protocol and Deep Subconscious Mind Reset protocol are producing a visible impact on the wider world, because much of the healing energy they generate is being held in reserve. It will be deployed once the interlopers leave for a time to take their planned vacation break, so that will avoid creating a backlash from having too noticeable an improvement developing right under their noses while they are working steadily to make things worse, leading up to the Alien Disclosure deception before they leave. You have also told us they are employing time travel to the future to evaluate the future impact as they fine-tune ramping up the negativity, because they want to ensure nothing interferes with the planned final solution, their successful annihilation of humanity. Is it actually the case that the future timeline is still leading to human annihilation because that is essential to have in place so as to not disturb their planned vacation break?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
130 views0 answers0 votes
123…79Next »
Ask Question