DWQA Questions › Tag: hidden hand
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A systematic review of 416 medical journal articles affirmed a strong association between higher serum vitamin D levels and a lower risk of bladder, breast, colon, endometrial, esophageal, gallbladder, kidney, ovarian, pancreatic, rectal, stomach, and vulvar cancers, as well as Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. The review also uncovered lower risks of metastasis and mortality from cancer in patients with higher levels of vitamin D. While vitamin D levels of 20 ng/ml (50 nmol/L) were adequate for bone and muscle health, reduction of cancer risk and mortality required levels greater than 40 ng/ml (100 nmol/L) and fell further with levels above 50 ng/ml (125 nmol/L). The review cautioned that studies showing no benefit for those taking less than 5,000 IU per day might be misleading. [Wimalawansa SJ. Vitamin D’s impact on cancer incidence and mortality: a systematic review. Nutrients. 2025 Jul 16;17(14):2333. Doi: 10.3390/nu17142333.] Is this a fair summary of vitamin D benefits for limiting incidence and severity of cancer?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
65 views0 answers0 votes
You have told us that 5000 IU of vitamin D3 taken twice a day would be safe and helpful for many, many people. Is that enough to get serum levels in a useful range for cancer prevention?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
57 views0 answers0 votes
Studies have shown that vitamin D levels have an inverted U-shaped curve, where low levels (<29.7 nmol/L) result in shortened telomeres on DNA, a sign of aging, but so do high levels of vitamin D (>95.9 nmol/L). Population-based studies and randomized clinical trials have shown a U- or J-shaped curve and suggested an increased risk of adverse outcomes in those with the highest serum Vitamin D levels, including falls, fractures, and frailty. Most studies have reported a higher risk in those participants with serum levels above 100 nmol/L. Are the deleterious effects noted in these studies caused by elevated vitamin D? If so, your support for taking 5,000 to 10,000 IU of vitamin D3 daily seems risky. What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
54 views0 answers0 votes
Is there currently any intent by the interlopers to have the tidal power outages start before the end of the Yom Kippur period of vulnerability of the stock market?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
109 views0 answers0 votes
I’m feeling very down again with everything dragging on, with gold and the market continuing to rally. Any changes in the outlook?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
144 views0 answers0 votes
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. reportedly plans to acknowledge an acetaminophen-autism link, sending Tylenol maker Kenvue’s stock plummeting. Is scientist William Parker’s hypothesis correct, that acetaminophen (Tylenol) causes autism in some children? If so, is that solely or partly because its neurotoxicity aggravates the neurologic injury from mercury injection done by the Extraterrestrial Alliance?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
89 views0 answers1 votes
There are still conflicting views and opinions about the DoD Directive 5240.01, reissued on September 27, 2024. Some quoting official sources claim, adamantly, that it grants no new power to the Defense Department and does not grant legal authority for the military to use lethal force on civilians. Others maintain that the directive now permits lethal force in cases of imminent threats or national security emergencies. Concerns are further dismissed by pointing out that lethal force can only be used with express authority of the Secretary of Defense, as though that could never be granted. A further contingency was included to allow immediate action for a 72-hour period, without such authorization. Is this just routine planning or is this a sinister manipulation to enhance potential future governmental control over citizens?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
60 views0 answers0 votes
A recent study showed that nine pharmaceuticals commonly used in residential aged care significantly enhanced bacterial resistance to antibiotics, adding to the growing worldwide problem of declining antibiotic effectiveness, and the attendant morbidity and mortality. These included Advil, Tylenol, diclofenac (an anti-inflammatory to treat arthritis), furosemide (for high blood pressure), metformin (for high sugar levels linked to diabetes), atorvastatin (to help lower cholesterol and fats in the blood), tramadol (a stronger pain medication post-surgery), temazepam (used to treat sleeping problems), and pseudoephedrine (a decongestant). Are these or other drugs also causing lowered immune defenses against chronic viruses, which you have confirmed are the cause of 85% of chronic diseases? Hanbiao Chen, Sylvia A. Sapula, John Turnidge, Henrietta Venter. The effect of commonly used non-antibiotic medications on antimicrobial resistance development in Escherichia coli. npj Antimicrobials and Resistance, 2025; 3 (1) DOI: 10.1038/s44259-025-00144-w.
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
108 views0 answers0 votes
Was the research, including the clinical data, for the paper we asked you about, “Acute inflammatory response via neutrophil activation protects against development of chronic pain,” valid and not corrupted by the interlopers to malign seemingly useful common painkillers? Given your warnings that clinical research cannot always be trusted, we just want to be sure. What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
69 views0 answers0 votes
Given your previous feedback that the triggering of the tidal power outages will likely be during this month of September, to coincide with a historical weak period of vulnerability for the stock market, the date of 9/11 is looming as a meaningful iconic anniversary. With the agenda of the interlopers as wanting to create a mystery, to ramp up fear and suspicion, using that date to launch their attack seems advantageous for their purposes. What can you tell us about the current status of their plans for the outages and their aftermath?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
97 views0 answers0 votes
The phenomena seem quite striking which are reported in the paper, “Acute inflammatory response via neutrophil activation protects against development of chronic pain,” by Marc Parisien et al. Sci Transl Med. 2022 May 11; 14(644). These authors showed in animal models that painkillers like corticosteroids and NSAIDs, but not analgesics like morphine or lidocaine which lack anti-inflammatory effects, end up prolonging pain, because without neutrophil activation being allowed to happen as part of an immune response, acute pain may become chronic. A clinical study confirmed that among patients whose lower back pain had become chronic, it was exclusively those who had been treated with NSAIDS who went on to develop neuropathy. Was this a valid study with broad implications about the unexpected downside of anti-inflammatory medication for moderating pain? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
68 views0 answers0 votes
I shudder when I consider I spent years striving to develop inhibitors of neutrophil activation as therapeutics for autoimmune disease. Was that not only misguided, but a sinister consequence of interloper manipulation to encourage the field of immunopharmacology, knowing it could make things worse? What can Creator tell us about the medical implications for using anti-inflammatories?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
72 views0 answers0 votes
Acetaminophen (paracetamol) also marketed as Tylenol, is one of the most widely-used drugs by pregnant women and children and studies have mounted showing a link between prenatal or early childhood exposure and neurodevelopmental disorders, like autism, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), language delays, behavioral problems, and lower IQ. Are those studies accurate and valid, or has there been interloper interference to create another cover story to mask their deliberate toxic manipulations of the brains of infants?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
67 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks about selling versus holding onto gold in a downturn: “What timing options can people consider beyond simply holding for the long term? I gather the word is that the drop will be sudden and you could just be too late, but would it be a good idea to sell right after the massive US power blackouts hit? I know there would be gaps in internet and stock market services for a time.” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
91 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “On the point about AI monitoring of our communications, I usually dictate my questions to you with my Android phone using the Google keyboard/dictation app. Would typing things in on the computer be more discreet?” What is most important for him to know?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
77 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1234…50Next »
Ask Question