DWQA Questions › Tag: human corruption
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A viewer asks: “There are so many examples in the Old Testament of God’s people killing the inhabitants of lands that they overtook at the Creator’s suggestion or command—every man woman and child. The Israelites were commanded to destroy several nations, including the Canaanites, Amorites, Hittites, Perizzites, Hivites, and Jebusites, as well as the Midianites. These commands are found in Deuteronomy 20:16–17 and Numbers 31:17. In the case of the Midianites, the Israelites were instructed to kill every man, woman, and child, except for the virgin girls, as recorded in Numbers 31. This is not meant to be a comprehensive list of all nations destroyed by the Israelites, but these are prominent examples in the Bible. Were these events truly commanded by God? Who was behind all this killing?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
99 views0 answers0 votes
It’s difficult to coherently discuss a problem when there is widespread confusion and no consensus on definitions. The words “psychopath” and “sociopath” are often used interchangeably, but some professionals and academics say there are important differences. One says, “Psychopathic behavior often results more from genetics or a congenital injury, whereas sociopathy is more from environmental factors.” Google’s AI overview lists these differences: Empathy and Remorse: Psychopaths have a complete lack of empathy and remorse, while sociopaths may show some degree of these emotions. Impulsivity: Psychopaths are more calculated and manipulative, while sociopaths are more impulsive and prone to erratic behavior. Causes: Psychopathy is thought to have a stronger genetic component, while sociopathy is more likely to be caused by environmental factors. A bestselling author would say both are essentially “without a conscience.” Can Creator comment on the usefulness or lack thereof of these definitions, and provide us with Creator’s definition of the problem, and best way to label and describe it?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
67 views0 answers0 votes
Bestselling Psychologist Martha Stout, Ph.D. wrote the bestseller, The Sociopath Next Door. She regards sociopaths as those “without a conscience” – which is how it is presumed Creator would define it. She would likely characterize psychopaths as simply more overtly violent sociopaths. She described sociopaths as possessing “a noncorrectable disfigurement of character that is now thought to be present in about 4 percent of the population – that is to say, one in twenty-five people.” She writes of sociopaths: “Sociopaths have a greater than normal need for stimulation, which results in their frequent social, physical, financial, or legal risks. And sociopaths are noted especially for their shallowness of emotion, the hollow and transient nature of any affectionate feelings they may claim to have, a certain breathtaking callousness. They have no trace of empathy and no genuine interest in bonding emotionally with a mate. Once the surface charm is scraped off, their marriages are loveless, one-sided, and almost always short term.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
58 views0 answers0 votes
Sociopaths make up only four percent of the human population, but according to Creator, they make up one hundred percent of all three physical extraterrestrial species interacting with Earth. Since we have little opportunity to study and observe alien behavior and civilizations, would becoming familiar with human sociopaths provide us with helpful and compelling insights into the nature and behaviors of these extraterrestrials?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
69 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Stout wrote, “Sociopaths have a greater than normal need for stimulation.” She also wrote: “In fact, terrorism (done from a distance) is the ideal occupation for a person who is possessed of blood lust and no conscience, because if you do it just right, you may be able to make a whole nation jump. And if that is not power, what is?” How about making an entire WORLD jump? Dr. Stout seems to have absolutely nailed the entire human dilemma with these observations. People wonder, how could “advanced beings” act this way? Well, they are “advanced sociopaths,” and this is how they are behaving. Apparently, with their “greater than normal” need for stimulation. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
64 views0 answers0 votes
Understanding the “greater than normal need for stimulation” helps us make sense of the numerous stone images of the Anunnaki throughout the Middle East. Not only are they giants, averaging 12 to 15 feet tall, but all of them appeared exceptionally “athletic” and muscular. And possessing advanced medical capabilities that can replace even lost limbs and organs, this would give them license to engage in “extreme sports” including combat sports with each other. Is it safe to say the Anunnaki are “high-strung,” impatient with everything, and bore easily? This sounds like the LAST kind of being you would want “lording over you?” How much of their average day is spent working out? Are they all “obsessed bodybuilder gym rats?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
86 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Stout wrote, about sociopaths, “The intellectual difference between right and wrong does not bring on the emotional sirens and flashing blue lights, or the fear of God, that it does for the rest of us. Without the slightest blip of guilt or remorse, one in twenty-five people can do anything at all.” She further wrote, “The presence or absence of conscience is a deep human division, arguably more significant than intelligence, race, or even gender.” “But as to what is possibly the single most meaningful characteristic that divides human species (and humans from extraterrestrials) – the presence or absence of conscience – we (humans) remain effectively oblivious.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
54 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Stout wrote, “A good psychopath can play a concerto on anyone’s heart strings … Your best defense is to understand the nature of these human predators.” Does that naturally and rationally extend to the extraterrestrial predators as well, and that the number one way they “play on our heart strings” is through channeling directly to humans who share those words with the world? Is our best defense against Anunnaki psychics, our attempts to understand the nature of these extraterrestrial predators? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
59 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Stout wrote, “It is crucial to note that all of the psychiatric diagnoses (including narcissism) involve some amount of personal distress or misery for the individuals who suffer from them.” “Sociopathy stands alone as a ‘disease’ that causes no dis-ease for the person who has it, no subjective discomfort. Sociopaths are often quite satisfied with themselves and with their lives, and perhaps for this very reason there is no effective treatment.” She also wrote, “We (humans) feel that if someone is bad, he should be burdened with the knowledge that he is bad. It seems to us the ultimate injustice that a person could be evil, by our assessment, and still feel fine about himself.” And even though beings like the Anunnaki don’t feel guilt, do they still try to make each other aware of their awfulness? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
58 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Stout wrote, “Sociopaths are infamous for their refusal to acknowledge responsibility for the decisions they make, or for the outcomes of their decisions. In fact, a refusal to see the results of one’s bad behavior as having anything to do with oneself – ‘consistent irresponsibility’ in the language of the American Psychiatric Association – is a cornerstone of the antisocial personality diagnosis. People without conscience provide endless examples of such stunning ‘I’ve done nothing wrong’ statements. Instead, when confronted with a destructive outcome that is clearly their doing, they will say, plain and simple, ‘I never did that,’ and will to all appearances believe their own direct lie. This feature of sociopathy makes self-awareness impossible, and in the end, just as the sociopath has no genuine relationships with other people, he has only a very tenuous one with himself.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
60 views0 answers0 votes
Nothing says “Divine Level Problem” like “Sociopath.” The good news is, contrary to what most psychological professionals sincerely believe, that this is a noncorrectable problem, Creator has emphatically said the opposite—that it absolutely is correctible and it is up to humans to correct it. The missing ingredient, however, is “divine partnership.” Without it, the professionals are indeed correct in assuming the problem is not at all fixable. Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support can be the means by which, eventually but not quickly, we humans, in partnership with the divine, can indeed correct the problem of sociopathy and the evil it causes throughout the universe, and for all of time?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
67 views0 answers0 votes
Is there any change in the expected sequence of events we have been warned about: the power outages, market collapse, gold reset, and then Alien Disclosure?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
107 views0 answers0 votes
In 2001, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) launched a trial to lower blood glucose levels in diabetic patients to reduce their risk for heart attack, stroke, or death from cardiovascular disease. The trial, called Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes, or ACCORD, involved over 10,000 Type 2 diabetic patients who had either been previously diagnosed with heart disease or had two or more risk factors for heart disease when they entered the study. Half received standard treatment and half were treated aggressively with higher doses of antidiabetic drugs. The trial was halted 18 months early because of a 26% increase in deaths in the aggressively treated group. The NIH said there was no conclusive link to a particular medication. Were these outcomes just a fluke or was over-medication involved? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
56 views0 answers0 votes
The diabetes drug rosiglitazone, sold under the trade name Avandia, has come under scrutiny. From 1999 to 2009, nearly 50,000 people on Avandia suffered heart attack, stroke, heart failure or death. In Europe, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) recommended in September 2010 that the drug be suspended because the benefits no longer outweighed the risks.[10][11] It was withdrawn from the market in the UK, Spain and India in 2010,[12] and in New Zealand and South Africa in 2011. It is still being prescribed in the U.S. following a review of safety data by the FDA. Is this drug safe to use or are there cardiovascular risks? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
59 views0 answers0 votes
Are clinical studies in less prominent foreign scientific journals more likely to be reliable than what is reported in major U.S. journals, due to less interloper interference with the studies or their interpretation?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
57 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous123456…105Next »
Ask Question