DWQA Questions › Tag: human corruption
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
What was the interloper perspective on Jesus and his ministry prior to his crucifixion? Is it to be assumed, like so much of the workings of the divine, that the actual spiritual, energetic, and miraculous workings performed by Jesus during his ministry were largely shielded from extraterrestrial observation? Is it true that all they saw was the aftermath of the miracles and not their actual mechanics? What did they, in fact, observe, and what were their evaluation and analytic conclusions regarding them? Was he a conundrum to them or, in their arrogance, did they just dismiss him without looking deeper? Was their engineering his path to crucifixion done with more urgency and determination than applied to other human victims throughout history? Or did they consider him utterly unextraordinary and had him crucified simply because they love giving a comeuppance to any human who stands out without their assistance and approval? What can Creator tell us about the interloper perspective on Jesus, both then and now?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
278 views0 answers0 votes
Rudolf Steiner wrote “Christ in the Etheric,” that following his crucifixion, Christ took up the mission of being a “gateway” presence to the physical afterlife; that following the crucifixion, Christ could meet the departed directly in the etheric or astral plane and assist with their transition, or coach them into returning to their life here for a period longer. His presence in the etheric puts him energetically closer to humans in the physical so that we can more easily feel his presence than might have been possible before, and all of this is happening while still largely being shielded from interloper observation and interference. Since this new mission appears to have commenced after his crucifixion, was the crucifixion itself necessary or a gateway to this new mission, or purely incidental and not at all integral to it in any way spiritually or energetically? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
249 views0 answers0 votes
Since Jesus was “born without sin” or, as Creator has previously described it, “born with a reprieve” or disconnection from his own negative personal karmic legacy, can it be assumed that he therefore had full access to both his higher self (the “Christ self” perhaps) as well as his deep subconscious, both of which are largely cut off from direct interaction for most humans? Undergoing torture and crucifixion, as Jesus Christ did, would normally be EXTREMELY traumatic to both the incarnated consciousness as well as for the deep subconscious. Normally, it would be expected to have a catastrophic impact on the overall vibration of the being and, in fact, probably ensure, in most cases, that the soul would find itself stuck in limbo and needing a Spirit Rescue as a result. Yet, he rose from the dead in physical form and eventually ascended to heaven. His death is widely considered a victory over evil, but it’s hard to claim victory if you simply become more traumatized and limited than before. So just HOW did Jesus “beat the odds” and overcome the well-known traumatic hazards of such a cruel death as he endured? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
224 views0 answers0 votes
The one thing that Creator has pointed to as a key factor for Get Wisdom is the advent of the Internet and the ability to communicate globally with humanity relatively freely and relatively inexpensively. Something not available, of course, at the time of Jesus. So for anything in his day and age to go viral, so to speak, using today’s Internet vocabulary, you needed instead an EXTRAORDINARY story, a narrative so compelling that it would go VIRAL by word of mouth alone. If that was the point and purpose of Christ’s Passion then, in that context, undergoing the crucifixion makes sense in spite of but also because of its intensity and dramatic appeal. It takes an awful LOT for a narrative to go viral by word of mouth alone. What was the most important aspect or behavioral outcome of that narrative? Wouldn’t it be the necessity for PRAYER and petitioning the divine? With “Christ in the Etheric” there was also his energetic presence to help provide necessary emotional and intuitive feedback to further energize the narrative and make it feel personal. We all know how people can’t seem to help gawking at trainwrecks. Did Jesus undergo a literal “trainwreck” in order to capitalize on that human proclivity and ensure the narrative would indeed “go viral?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
212 views0 answers0 votes
If Jesus could have given humanity the Lightworker Healing Protocol more than two thousand years ago, we’d like to think he would have. Creator has told us that without Jesus’ sacrifice NONE of us would be here today. Can Creator share with us how the mission of Christ and the mission of Get Wisdom complement each other and, in fact, may be mutually dependent on each other? Can Creator tell us if and how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are a continuation of Christ’s mission for humanity and an establishment of divine-human partnership that will lead to an even greater destiny and outcome for humanity and all beings everywhere?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
227 views0 answers0 votes
In reflecting on the information you gave us for our Get Wisdom Live episode titled “Creator Discusses Extreme Human Vulnerability to Authority,” I am wondering about a possible sinister influence by the interlopers to corrupt Homeowner’s Associations. Horror stories are legion about poor oversight, favoritism, onerous rules, and negative experiences of all kinds. To what extent are such groups being undermined to cause problems?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
73 views0 answers0 votes
In a recent episode of Get Wisdom Live titled “Creator Discusses Extreme Human Vulnerability to Authority,” we recounted documented studies of mock prisons, showing college students randomly assigned to be guards or prisoners were surprisingly willing to act like perpetrators or passive victims. I just read a story in a recent issue of The New Yorker about the problem of mentally ill people who end up in jail starving to death. Is the extreme neglect that represents, a result of manipulation of law enforcement personnel by the interlopers to not only become insensitive to the needs of the incarcerated but actively apply policies to enhance their suffering?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
67 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Are Grok or other AI platforms intended to gather and distill all human knowledge? Do they all feed into the AI systems of the interlopers?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
374 views0 answers0 votes
She asks: “Does this intention for AI include using the information gathered to target human sources of designated objectionable material?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
293 views0 answers0 votes
She asks: “Does sharing information from and about Get Wisdom make such users vulnerable in the hands of AI platforms?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
197 views0 answers0 votes
She asks: “Is a further intention behind AI systems to coerce humans into relying on AI for all information and abandon any individual intuition, analysis or creativity?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
297 views0 answers0 votes
She asks: “Are users of AI platforms receiving encouraging programming to make them feel of superior intellect and insight to those who don’t?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
145 views0 answers0 votes
She asks: “Would the store of information accumulated ultimately, be edited to supply only “accepted” information, as occurs with Google? Could the ultimate intention be to house all human knowledge and thereby make human intuition, analysis or creativity obsolete?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
276 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner who was discouraged from feeding Get Wisdom channelings to an AI system asks: “I suggest you do a channeling specifically on the Grok AI and the future prospects, especially when the ETs go away. Is it helpful to add the request from Grok into our sessions? And is it really that harmful to interact with Grok as Karl says it is?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
318 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “If you think I’m wrong then why don’t you ask why does Grok feel safe to me and open AI feels awful. Open AI would definitely be a problem like you stated. I don’t feel any of that intuition with Grok.” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
298 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…56789…112Next »
Ask Question