DWQA Questions › Tag: mind control manipulation
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A viewer asks: “Can the interlopers mind control someone with a “program” of narcissistic tendencies that they “install” like a sort of software, to make them act in a narcissistic way with SIMULATED behaviors, because they have learned that this will seriously disrupt human relationships and hurt both the target of the programming and their close ones, but without that person actually being a narcissist if it wasn’t for this program?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
373 views0 answers0 votes
Is such mind control actually one of the causes for the current seeming epidemic of narcissistic behavior and accusations of narcissism by those at the receiving end, especially women accusing men?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
315 views0 answers0 votes
If so, what percentage of narcissistic behavior is due to this weird cause, rather than actual cases of narcissistic personality disorder (NPD)?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
357 views0 answers0 votes
And if real, will this form of “fake” simulated narcissism suddenly end after the interlopers withdraw?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
381 views0 answers0 votes
A new YouTube video from the Farsight Institute of an intuitive conversation, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQ3YwXRYeZo&t=2s, claimed to be with an extraterrestrial, reveals a more detailed plan for Alien Disclosure. It will not only be worldwide, involving all governments and the United Nations to organize a human rejection of the extraterrestrial Reptilian domination of Earth, but will include a war in the skies between extraterrestrial factions. The so-called “good ETs” will battle the Reptilians, at least enough to demonstrate that they mean business. Then, the show of force by benevolent ETs, coupled with human collaboration to reject the Reptilians, will cause them to withdraw. Is this an accurate description of the Disclosure events to come, and what will be the outcome? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
644 views0 answers0 votes
Is Elon Musk’s prediction that the latest generation of Artificial Intelligence, called Sora, will eliminate human jobs and provide a brain-machine interface that will promote human evolution an accurate forecast? Is merging with AI the next step humanity will embark on? Is this actually sinister in its intentions? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
435 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “As I understand what will happen with the ET Disclosure, humans will be encouraged to ask the ETs for help to get rid of the alien Greys. Will God stop humans from appointing ETs for alien Grey cleanup? Or will God allow that to happen and then what excuse will be given for the ETs to go on vacation?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
466 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “If we succeed in making the Extraterrestrial Alliance withdraw, would this be done with or without the knowledge of their hybrid minions in the global power structure?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
424 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Will the Extraterrestrial Alliance’s hybrid minions be charged with keeping an eye on their farm, whilst away, maybe with the Mercenary Army Program recruits acting as overall watchdogs to ensure compliance?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
375 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Please can you enquire with Creator whether my working with energy healer [name withheld] is for my highest and best, please? I have previously found benefit and am strongly attracted to his channeling course. I ALWAYS protect my space and call in God when working with anyone.” What can we tell her?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
485 views0 answers0 votes
A former intelligence agent started a business coaching people in spy techniques and insights that he believed could be applied to everyday life to help people be more effective in accomplishing whatever it is they set out to do. Like most things in life, these techniques and understandings can be used for good or evil. A match can light a birthday candle or start a forest fire. To the extent that others might use these teachings for harm, how much karmic liability attaches to the teacher? Is this a reason why dangerous knowledge was historically reserved for initiates? And even that would seem to have karmic polarity in that it safeguards the innocent and immature on the one hand, but can also be a means to hoard and deny access to resources that one can argue should be more widely shared. What is Creator’s perspective on the “safe handling” and/or dissemination and sharing of material that is potentially helpful but equally dangerous?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
588 views0 answers0 votes
Intelligence agencies are in the business of gathering intelligence—information that is difficult to attain through ordinary means; information that people are hesitant and resistant to give up or share. The successful intelligence agent will employ the tools of motivation and manipulation to get this information. These tools are matched to particular means with which to motivate and/or manipulate people to get them to do what you want them to do. These approaches are referred to with the acronym “R.I.C.E.” Reward, Ideology, Coercion, and Ego. Of these four, appealing to ideology is seen as the most effective, and coercion the least. If you successfully appeal to ideology, the “target” will trust you and share almost anything. Coercion is the weakest as, contrary to Hollywood, it may work the first time you use it, but then you destroy trust and will have fewer opportunities for future success with the target. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
449 views0 answers0 votes
While being trained as an intelligence officer, this individual learned he was an ideal candidate because he was special (clearly an appeal to ego), or at least that is what he thought. But, in fact, he learned he was special because he had been algorithmically identified as psychologically damaged and traumatized in particular ways that were useful for intelligence gathering. These are people one would rarely label “well adjusted” by society’s standards. The agency was ruthlessly honest in telling him they intended to leverage that dysfunction, give him a vocabulary for understanding the nuances of human motivation and manipulation, and techniques for achieving goals and agendas with targets. In this undertaking, the overall wellbeing of the target is not a top consideration and moral flexibility was a prized capacity for successful agents. What is Creator’s perspective on the moral flexibility so highly prized by intelligence agencies?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
416 views0 answers0 votes
This former intelligence officer shared that if you need a target’s cooperation, and there is no means by which to positively and transparently motivate them, then that gives you the green light to manipulate them. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
443 views0 answers0 votes
This former intelligence officer warned that the typical person has no idea just how much and on what scale advanced motivation and manipulation techniques are being deployed against them. It’s not a conspiracy theory. Creator has affirmed this as well on multiple occasions. When confronted with this reality, two questions come to mind. Can I avoid it? And if I can’t avoid it, can I successfully resist it? Is there even an answer outside of divine partnership? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
452 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…4546474849…184Next »
Ask Question