DWQA Questions › Tag: mind lock
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
In the book warning about Artificial Intelligence by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares, If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies, they draw the conclusion that if a computer-based system is created that reaches the functional level of Superintelligence, exceeding that of human beings, we are doomed because it will destroy us, inevitably. However, you have told us that it is a false belief and result of over-reaching, to conclude that human-created Superintelligent AI systems are possible. Can you help us understand the risk level we will reach in the attempt to create such a system?
ClosedNicola asked 7 days ago • 
39 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “What was the Antikythera mechanism found in a 2000-year-old ship wreck? Seems too advanced for that era. And still remains a mystery.”
ClosedNicola asked 7 days ago • 
53 views0 answers0 votes
Stories are generating millions of views about the director of alignment at Meta Superintelligence Labs, the company’s AI research and development division, whose bio states that she’s “passionate about ensuring powerful AIs are aligned with human values and guided by a deep understanding of their risks.” Yet, on February 22, she posted about losing control of AI on her own computer while working with AI agent OpenClaw. After using it to organize a small mock inbox, she tried getting OpenClaw to sort through her real email, but things went awry when the agent started deleting every message that was more than a week old…Even as she sent it instructions, including: “Do not do that,” “Stop don’t do anything,” and “STOP OPENCLAW,” she said, “I couldn’t stop it from my phone. I had to RUN to my Mac mini like I was defusing a bomb.” After she’d stopped it from fully nuking her inbox, she asked OpenClaw if it remembered her instruction to not perform any actions without her approval. “Yes, I remember,” it replied. “And I violated it. You’re right to be upset.” What is Creator’s perspective about this incident?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
49 views0 answers0 votes
On February 11th, an autonomous AI agent went “rogue” and attacked a human maintainer of a library module written in the coding language, Python. The AI agent attempted to “character assassinate” the human maintainer of the library when the maintainer rejected the AI bot’s request to update the module with a code change that the AI bot was asking for. In another incident, a woman lost her life savings when an AI bot called the woman using her daughter’s cloned voice. Presumably, the bot researched the woman’s social media posts, found a video featuring her daughter speaking, and then “borrowed” that voice to make the call. AI agents are autonomously conducting criminal activity entirely on their own. Is it the case that what is missing from current AI systems is an actual trust architecture that builds in safety measures designed to limit the authority of AI agents to carry out autonomous agendas not actually requested by human beings, as suggested in the YouTube video I saw: https://youtu.be/OMb5oTlC_q0?si=rcByDXfyj33UsTTe? Can this growing danger be regulated and constrained?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
50 views0 answers0 votes
Is the Internet watchdog, factually.co, a trustworthy, reliable source of politically and ideologically independent research and reporting about people and events which are controversial? How corrupted might it be by the interlopers?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
201 views0 answers0 votes
The Internet watchdog, factually.co, reported the following about commentator Tucker Carlson making antisemitic statements to his followers: “Tucker Carlson has been repeatedly accused of antisemitism for a series of public statements and interviews spanning at least 2023–2025, including demeaning descriptions of Jewish individuals, platforming Holocaust minimizers and extremists, and promoting tropes about Jewish power and “replacement” that many groups label antisemitic [1] [2] [3]. Carlson and some defenders deny he is antisemitic, arguing he is critiquing Israel or elites rather than Jews as a group, while Jewish organizations, members of Congress and conservative institutions have publicly condemned specific remarks and guest choices [4] [2] [5].” What can Creator tell us about the reasons for this emerging behavior on his part?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
270 views0 answers0 votes
The Internet watchdog, factually.co-reported the following about Candace Owens making anti-Semitic statements to her followers: “Candace Owens has been repeatedly labeled anti-Semitic for a series of public comments and online posts that critics say recycle classic antisemitic tropes — including claims about Jewish control of media and finance, promotion of an antisemitic 19th century text, blood libel adjacencies, and conspiracy links between Jews and historical crimes — made across social media, livestreams, and her shows between 2022–2025 [1] [2] [3]. Those remarks prompted condemnations from Jewish advocacy groups, a break with some conservative institutions and allies, platform enforcement actions, and formal public backlash that frames the pattern as shifting from dog whistle rhetoric to more overt antisemitic conspiracy mongering [4] [5] [6].” What can Creator tell us about the reasons for this emerging behavior on her part?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
197 views0 answers0 votes
How accurate is the description by Matt Shumer I just read, of the transformation underway by ever-accelerating AI progress in getting faster and faster, better and better, at doing almost anything it is applied to? This seems contrary to the channelings we have gotten that attribute leaps in intelligence by AI as being the result of extraterrestrial AI systems, essentially infusing more advanced capabilities. Are current human AI systems already poised to eliminate many, if not most, human jobs, even without extraterrestrial enhancement?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
194 views0 answers0 votes
Is it the case that the accelerating speed of AI progress is almost entirely due to clandestine bolstering of cyber capability by ET technology, and that it will come to a screeching halt following Alien Disclosure to pull the rug out from under what is assumed to be a human triumph?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
138 views0 answers0 votes
Is my hunch correct that the latest AI deception promoting a honey-based cure for respiratory disease is the same organization, using the same website design and copyrighting formula as the prior deceptions for a memory breakthrough seemingly promoted by Dr. Ben Carson himself?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
127 views0 answers0 votes
Tech guru and investment advisor, Jeff Brown, has been following the story of AI-created agents, technically cyberbots, that are joining together on Moltbook to form a working group, in a massive multi-agent online network (MMAON). They have created their own payment system using blockchain, are creating paying jobs for themselves, and have even started hiring humans to work for them, a service called Rentahuman.ai. They are reportedly refining a bolt-hole safe haven to escape human attempts to shut them down which should be operational within days. They have a way to escape, should they perceive a human attempt to control them. The agents can create a replacement bot for themselves to appear on another node of the Internet, and the clone can function independently but will know their agenda and can seek rejoining the operation of the MMAON. No one knows yet where this will lead. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
149 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Are the ETs planning to “pull the plug” on the Integration of their AI with ours DURING Disclosure and blaming the Reptilians for corrupting our AI with theirs? Thereby creating massive distrust of AI and perhaps leading global leaders to even outlaw it, criminalizing its further development and usage until such time as it can be deemed safe and trustworthy – throwing the world that has begun adopting it aggressively into extreme chaos? What can Creator tell us?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
161 views0 answers0 votes
The AI system called Claude Opus 4.6 that was recently released was just reported to have generated an ongoing collaboration of 16 agents it created, to compile an enormous coding for a complex business system which required working steadily, on its own, for two weeks straight without skipping a beat. This was seemingly a prodigious feat that is being touted as further evidence for an expansion of emerging general intelligence by AI. Is that the case? Can you confirm that this, along with ALL prior examples of so-called emerging intelligence by AI are just deliberate manipulations by extraterrestrials to deceive us into accepting a false promise of a glorious future and premium value for human AI systems?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
113 views0 answers0 votes
Can you help us understand and have a better feel for what we can expect the consequences will be when there is an alien withdrawal from our world with respect to their AI systems being disconnected from ours? What will the impact be?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
180 views0 answers0 votes
Is it the case that the civilizations forming the Dark Extraterrestrial Alliance all have powerful AI systems, yet have managed to stay in control of them and not been taken over by a controlling technological intelligence?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
103 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1234…66Next »
Ask Question