DWQA Questions › Tag: mind lockFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesChauncy Depew said, “Follow the path of the unsafe, independent thinker. Expose your ideas to the dangers of controversy. Speak your mind and fear less the label of ‘crackpot’ than the stigma of conformity. And on issues that seem important to you, stand up and be counted at any cost.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 days ago • Human Potential24 views0 answers0 votesAndrew Young said, “There can be no democracy without truth. There can be no truth without controversy, there can be no change without freedom. Without freedom there can be no progress.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 days ago • Human Potential21 views0 answers0 votesAdam Driver said, “Any actor is happy to be involved with something that’s challenging, controversial, and not easily palatable. Things that are too dumbed down or easy to swallow are uninteresting… It’s good when people have such a polarizing response.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 days ago • Human Potential17 views0 answers0 votesRobert Redford said, “I’m not a lawyer, but I do know this: we need to protect our ability to tell controversial stories.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 days ago • Human Potential22 views0 answers0 votesSpeaking of lawyers, when Brian was in law school, he participated in an exercise called “Moot Court.” The exercise consisted of arguing both sides of a controversial case. Many students really struggle with this exercise. For example, as a prosecuting attorney arguing for Charles Manson’s guilt, and then as a defense attorney arguing for his innocence. For many, many people, and even attorneys, that kind of mental flexibility is literally “asking too much.” What is Creator’s perspective on the appropriateness or inappropriateness of this exercise? And why is this such a struggle for so many?ClosedNicola asked 3 days ago • Human Potential24 views0 answers0 votesThe 1983 movie War Games is famous for a response from the computer when it finished war-gaming nuclear war. It said, “Strange game. The only winning move is not to play.” Many seem to believe this applies to controversial conversations as well. The only winning move is not to converse at all. When it comes to engaging in controversial conversations, when might this strategy be in divine alignment, and even more importantly, when is it not? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 days ago • Human Potential24 views0 answers0 votesA quote from the book The Courage to be Disliked by Ichiro Kishimi and Fumitake Koga reads, “Children who have not been taught to confront challenges will try to avoid all challenges.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 days ago • Human Potential22 views0 answers0 votesSpreading the message of Get Wisdom to others likely means successfully engaging in many challenging, difficult, and controversial conversations. How can Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support help aspiring speakers of truth to spread the word as effectively as possible?ClosedNicola asked 3 days ago • Human Potential35 views0 answers0 votesHas there been any change in the interloper agenda to trigger a market drawdown by launching tidal power outages in the US, causing blackouts for days, followed by a gold reset, and then the long-planned Alien Disclosure with a deceptive offer to help humanity?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Extraterrestrial Agenda222 views0 answers0 votesCan amyloidosis be caused by a chronic virus, and if so, in what percent of cases?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers135 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Several writers and scholars have written books on what has been called the “Big History” of humanity, covering time way before written historical records and relying on geological, anthropological, and archaeological evidence. Some writers such as R.A. Boulay have written on humans supposed existence on Earth from about 500,000 years ago. How accurate is Boulay’s book, Flying Serpents and Dragons: The Story of Mankind’s Reptilian Past? It has been dismissed as “pseudoarchaeology”—interpreting myths as literal history without material evidence.”ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers171 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “High blood pressure is conventionally regarded as a health risk and that lowering it reduces risk, especially in moderate-to-severe systolic BP of 140-159 mmHg. Dr. Malcolm Kendrick author of Doctoring Data claims that cardiovascular risk increases more steeply after systolic BP reaches around 160-170 mmHg—well beyond the 140/90 threshold often used to diagnose and treat hypertension. A rule of thumb in medicine is that for older individuals, a systolic BP of around 100 + age is a reasonable upper limit beyond which cardiovascular risks increase significantly. Is hypertension over-treated, given that aggressively lowering blood pressure—especially in older individuals—can be harmful?”ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions142 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “A 2018 book, Medical Nihilism, by Jacob Stegenga claims the healthcare system over-adopts treatments and under-recognizes risks. He states confidence in the effectiveness of medical interventions should be low because empirical evidence for the efficacy of many treatments is weak due to methodological flaws, publication bias, the influence of commercial interests. He claims positive studies are more likely to be published, screening programs tend to detect and treat cancers that would never cause harm, common treatments can cause long-term complications, short trial durations miss long-term harms etc. How accurate is his view that evidence is systematically skewed and harms are undercounted?”ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions121 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Dr. Bernard Lown, a Harvard cardiologist in the 1980s, criticized the rapid rise of surgical Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts (CABG), noting 20–40% were potentially avoidable, especially in stable angina, and many patients had uncertain survival benefit. He advocated medical therapy—nitrates, beta-blockers, lifestyle changes—for symptom control. How accurate is it to say that in 2026, evidence-based guidelines and trials have reduced avoidable CABG to <10% for high-risk, guideline-selected patients, and that for low-risk, stable patients, surgery rarely improves survival, and that beta-blockers, nitrates, ACE inhibitors, lifestyle changes are to be preferred?”ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions113 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “A 2012 paper in the British Medical Journal “Use of relative and absolute effect measures in reporting health inequalities” concluded that “75% (258/344) [of 2009 papers] reported only relative effect measures.” Absolute risk reduction is often far less impressive and less often stated. This suggests that physicians will overestimate the efficacy of treatments and patients may have a misplaced belief in both effectiveness and risks. To what extent does this practice mislead patients and clinicians and benefit pharmaceutical manufacturers?”ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions69 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola