DWQA Questions › Tag: mind lock
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Another technology that has mysterious origins is cryptocurrencies. To this day, no one really knows where Bitcoin originated, who created it, or who introduced it to the world. There is speculation all over the place, and it’s assumed someone knows, but that information is not public knowledge. Is Bitcoin a “gift” (more like a naked Trojan horse) from the interlopers? And is AI, and how it really works, similar in its origins? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
223 views0 answers0 votes
There is a good joke that’s been around for a while, but it’s especially pertinent when it comes to evaluating AI: “It must be true, I read it on the Internet.” Everyone knows this means it’s more likely not to be true. But when it comes to AI, almost everything it “knows” comes from the Internet. And because it tends to weigh true and false by frequency of encounter, the more AI encounters the same images, assertions, statements, treatments, opinions, etc., the more statistically weighted it will be. The term, “There’s safety in numbers,” comes to mind in that the idea is, the more frequently something is encountered, the more genuine it probably is. This becomes AI’s “default assumption” about the material it is trained with. It can only utilize, evaluate, and regurgitate the material it is trained with. This turned out to be quite a problem early on because the sheer amount of racist, violent, and derogatory material on the Internet was not fully appreciated until AI started digesting it. It became necessary to employ untold thousands of low-paid (on the order of two dollars a day) “content evaluators,” mostly in third-world countries, to filter out gore, hate speech, child sexual abuse material, and pornographic images. If AI read it on the Internet, it must be true? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
184 views0 answers0 votes
The authors of The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want wrote: “With LLMs (large language models), the situation is even worse than garbage in/garbage out – they will make paper-mache out of their training data, mushing it up and remixing it into new forms that don’t preserve the communicative intent of original data. Paper-mache made out of good data is still paper-mache.” They also write: “This is why we like to call language models (like popular chatbots) ‘synthetic text extruding machines.'” They also write: “In the case of language modeling, the correct answer of which word came next is just whatever word happened to come next in the training corpus. … So if (popular chatbots) are nothing more than souped-up autocomplete, why are so many people convinced that it’s actually ‘understanding’ and ‘reasoning?'” Why indeed? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
99 views0 answers0 votes
Propaganda has always been a huge problem, but may be an even bigger issue for AI. China and the Chinese Communist Party spend more money and effort, and engage more of its citizens to spread blatantly false propaganda, than perhaps the rest of the world combined. To such an extent that it felt the need to create its very own global social media platform, TikTok. The Trump administration has even proposed banning TikTok altogether because of the nefarious role the platform plays in both gathering intelligence and spreading propaganda. Some of the lies people are starting to believe about China, that it has no crime, that its infrastructure is some of the most advanced and safest in the world, that there are no homeless people in China, that everyone there has a meaningful and lucrative job, that they are the healthiest and happiest people on the planet, and on and on. When, in fact, the exact opposite is more often than not the case. And for every good lie they tell about themselves, they tell an equally bad one about America and Europe. The problem is, they are so prolific and extreme with this propaganda that the Chinese people themselves believe none of it (about themselves, anyway), and Americans and Europeans (especially young ones) are beginning to believe all of it. With AI having no way to filter this for truth or falsity other than volume, there appears to be a genuine danger of AI itself presenting this propaganda as gospel truth, that China is great and America and Europe are evil. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
212 views0 answers0 votes
The authors of AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference, suggest that the track record of AI used for predicting social outcomes is so abysmally bad that it may actually amount to fraud. They write: “In short, some existing limits to predictability could be overcome with more and better data, while others seem intrinsic (built in and unfixable). In some cases, such as cultural products (like resume scanning AI, or AI used to decide who gets social benefits), we don’t expect predictability to get much better at all. In others, such as predicting individuals’ life outcomes, there could be some improvements but not drastic changes. Unfortunately, this hasn’t stopped companies from selling AI for making consequential decisions about people by predicting their future. So it is important to resist AI snake oil that’s already in wide use today rather than passively hope that predictive AI technology will get better.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
113 views0 answers0 votes
The authors of both books [The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want and AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference] were not the least bit concerned that AI presented an immediate or near-term existential threat to humanity in any way, shape, or form, despite copious media hype to the contrary. All the authors, on the other hand, were VERY concerned about the misuse of AI to reduce our freedom and agency to choose for ourselves, to retain the rights to our creative outputs, and even to have recourse when AI decides wrongly (which they assert it is guaranteed to do). Can Creator tell us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are the best ways to combat the danger and encroachment of AI in our lives?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
115 views0 answers0 votes
The suspect accused of killing four people in a Manhattan high-rise building on July 28, 2025, allegedly left a note behind that appeared to blame the NFL for a brain injury, according to New York City Mayor Eric Adams. The alleged attacker, 27-year-old Shane Tamura of Las Vegas, committed suicide by shooting himself after he allegedly opened fire at the 345 Park Avenue building that houses the NFL’s headquarters, along with other businesses. During an interview on CBS News, Adams was asked about a possible motive in the shooting. The mayor said that a note was allegedly found stating the shooter felt he had chronic traumatic encephalopathy, a brain injury more commonly known as CTE that some football players have been known to develop. “He appeared to have blamed the NFL for his injury,” Adams said. A media search found no one with the name Shane Tamura ever played in the NFL, including on teams’ practice squads. What caused this state of mind, and to kill because of it?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
205 views0 answers0 votes
The Director of Department of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, just announced that government records were turned over to the Justice Department for investigation because they describe a White House meeting on Dec. 9, 2016, by then lame-duck President Barack Obama, in which he directed that a revised intelligence estimate be generated alleging Russian hacking of the presidential election to rig it in favor of Donald Trump. She said: “There is irrefutable evidence that details how President Barack Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew that was false.” The records show that prior intelligence estimates had said no evidence was found of any cyberattacks or tampering with voting had occurred by Russia in the 2016 presidential election. If true, this would seem to represent a malicious and cynical perversion of our democracy for political gain from hampering the newly elected Republican president. The Watergate scandal got President Nixon to resign for conspiring with a group of rogue former CIA operatives to bug a telephone at the Democrat campaign headquarters. Here we have President Obama commandeering federal intelligence and law enforcement agencies, including the CIA, DNI, NSA, FBI, and DOJ to spy on and undermine a newly elected Republican administration with investigations now spanning 10 years. If true, this is breathtaking in its scope and daring. Was this more than “politics” but rather an orchestrated series of mind control manipulations to tar everyone involved?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
195 views0 answers0 votes
What circumstances motivated the attack by a knife-wielding assailant stabbing 11 strangers at a Michigan Wal-Mart on July 26, 2025, leaving 6 in critical condition?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
156 views0 answers0 votes
A number of research studies have been called into question because of poor reproducibility when an attempt to replicate their findings failed. A “replication crisis” has been noted for psychology, sociology, education, economics, and medical research. For example, a detailed inquiry was mounted to replicate 193 experiments from 53 top cancer papers published from 2010-2012. Only a quarter of the original findings were able to be reproduced. Moreover, even for effects that were reproduced, the magnitude averaged 85% less than observed in the original investigations. This is concerning because such experiments are crucial for deciding what to pursue for drug development and when to proceed to clinical trials. Unreliable results not only waste money but expose patients to unnecessary risks. While there are many understandable reasons why results can vary, what can Creator tell us about hidden reasons for such poor reproducibility and their impact on the reliability of scientific inquiry?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
125 views0 answers0 votes
A recent post in Neuroscience News highlighted a new study that reveals a possible link between common herpesvirus infections and the early biological changes that precede dementia. “The strongest viral associations were seen for Epstein-Barr virus and HHV6 (human herpesvirus 6)…These findings support the hypothesis that chronic viral infections may accelerate neurodegeneration and raise dementia risk independently of genetic factors.” (“Human herpes viruses are associated with steeper age-dependent increases of serum biomarkers for dementia in cognitively unimpaired women” by Lisa M. James et al. Scientific Reports). Is this a valid clue supporting the viral causation of dementia?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
282 views0 answers0 votes
Arguably, the biggest champion over the years for cancer as a metabolic disease and largely ignored by medical opinion leaders, has been Dr. Thomas Seyfried who has promoted ketogenic diets as an adjunct to conventional treatment. A state of ketosis lowers blood sugar which tumor cells need, and elevates ketone bodies which normal cells can use for energy but tumor cells can’t. But even he seems blind to the clues about viral causation. In a 2014 study in Cancer Letters, he augments his theory of the central role of metabolism in glioblastoma in describing how 90% of brain tumor cells are infected by cytomegalovirus, “which is a supercharger for allowing tumor cells to use glucose and glutamine.” That biochemical pathway allows energy for tumors to grow despite inadequate oxygenation. But he doesn’t ask, why are viruses there to begin with and what other role might they play? Is this an example of mind control suppression to limit scientific progress?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
186 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “This is a question myself and many others want answered. It seems as if great music, about love and having high vibrations gets no attention anymore. R&B groups, Pop artists, Rock bands, and artists who sing about positivity and love no longer sell and no one seems to care. While artists who promote debauchery and negativity shine and get all the attention. Are the interlopers to blame? Are they using mind control to cause humans to not care about good music that promotes high vibrations? Furthermore, what can artists do to combat this, if possible? Should they move to other genres like Gospel or Classical? What can artists and performers do to continue to help spread positivity and love?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
243 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Would it be helpful to pray to you, Creator, to not only replace all self-limiting beliefs but to be open to and be inspired by beliefs that are positive, powerful, and the most helpful in fostering our highest alignment with Creator in the safest and quickest way for all levels of the mind? Or would this be an addition we could make to the LHP if we are interested in that for ourselves? How can we cultivate beliefs that are shaped and constructed by higher truth to serve us? What can Source Creator share with us regarding guiding the improvement of our beliefs?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
109 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Is Artificial Intelligence (AI) fully an ET creation? Or did some form of ancient AI exist before the creation of physical ETs and affect them somehow? Is there any other origin of AI from another timeline, dimension, or reality affecting ETs that is also affecting humanity? How important will Organic Intelligence from nature and humanity and the divine be in coming times with Artificial Intelligence on the rise (before Ascension perhaps)?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
231 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous12345…62Next »
Ask Question