DWQA Questions › Tag: mind lockFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesHas there been any change in the interloper agenda to trigger a market drawdown by launching tidal power outages in the US, causing blackouts for days, followed by a gold reset, and then the long-planned Alien Disclosure with a deceptive offer to help humanity?ClosedNicola asked 3 days ago • Extraterrestrial Agenda33 views0 answers0 votesCan amyloidosis be caused by a chronic virus, and if so, in what percent of cases?ClosedNicola asked 3 days ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers18 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Several writers and scholars have written books on what has been called the “Big History” of humanity, covering time way before written historical records and relying on geological, anthropological, and archaeological evidence. Some writers such as R.A. Boulay have written on humans supposed existence on Earth from about 500,000 years ago. How accurate is Boulay’s book, Flying Serpents and Dragons: The Story of Mankind’s Reptilian Past? It has been dismissed as “pseudoarchaeology”—interpreting myths as literal history without material evidence.”ClosedNicola asked 3 days ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers34 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “High blood pressure is conventionally regarded as a health risk and that lowering it reduces risk, especially in moderate-to-severe systolic BP of 140-159 mmHg. Dr. Malcolm Kendrick author of Doctoring Data claims that cardiovascular risk increases more steeply after systolic BP reaches around 160-170 mmHg—well beyond the 140/90 threshold often used to diagnose and treat hypertension. A rule of thumb in medicine is that for older individuals, a systolic BP of around 100 + age is a reasonable upper limit beyond which cardiovascular risks increase significantly. Is hypertension over-treated, given that aggressively lowering blood pressure—especially in older individuals—can be harmful?”ClosedNicola asked 3 days ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions25 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “A 2018 book, Medical Nihilism, by Jacob Stegenga claims the healthcare system over-adopts treatments and under-recognizes risks. He states confidence in the effectiveness of medical interventions should be low because empirical evidence for the efficacy of many treatments is weak due to methodological flaws, publication bias, the influence of commercial interests. He claims positive studies are more likely to be published, screening programs tend to detect and treat cancers that would never cause harm, common treatments can cause long-term complications, short trial durations miss long-term harms etc. How accurate is his view that evidence is systematically skewed and harms are undercounted?”ClosedNicola asked 3 days ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions24 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Dr. Bernard Lown, a Harvard cardiologist in the 1980s, criticized the rapid rise of surgical Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts (CABG), noting 20–40% were potentially avoidable, especially in stable angina, and many patients had uncertain survival benefit. He advocated medical therapy—nitrates, beta-blockers, lifestyle changes—for symptom control. How accurate is it to say that in 2026, evidence-based guidelines and trials have reduced avoidable CABG to <10% for high-risk, guideline-selected patients, and that for low-risk, stable patients, surgery rarely improves survival, and that beta-blockers, nitrates, ACE inhibitors, lifestyle changes are to be preferred?”ClosedNicola asked 3 days ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions20 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “A 2012 paper in the British Medical Journal “Use of relative and absolute effect measures in reporting health inequalities” concluded that “75% (258/344) [of 2009 papers] reported only relative effect measures.” Absolute risk reduction is often far less impressive and less often stated. This suggests that physicians will overestimate the efficacy of treatments and patients may have a misplaced belief in both effectiveness and risks. To what extent does this practice mislead patients and clinicians and benefit pharmaceutical manufacturers?”ClosedNicola asked 3 days ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions16 views0 answers0 votesHow reliable is the medical AI platform, called OpenEvidence, that physicians are increasingly relying on for medical knowledge and insights to manage their patient caseload? Is this an advancement improving medical practice, is it about equally adding benefit but introducing drawbacks, or is it actually a net negative?ClosedNicola asked 3 days ago • Problems in Society27 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Dr. Malcolm Kendrick in his book, Doctoring Data, suggests more patients are harmed by over-treatment than helped. He claims published treatment benefits are often exaggerated by hiding behind relative risk (to mask how tiny most benefits are), selective reporting (such as statistical significance without meaningful benefit), or clever framing (such as natural variation in cholesterol or blood pressure) is medicalized as a treatable condition. To what extent is published medical research actually the fabricated appearance of scientific rigor to sell a product?”ClosedNicola asked 3 days ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions16 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “What percentage of patients take drugs for almost no real benefit, even while risking side effects and penalized by the cost?”ClosedNicola asked 3 days ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions21 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Can either the war in Ukraine or the war in Iran spread over Europe or even over the world? How bad will this refugee situation get in Europe? Will Russia invade the Baltics or some other region as well?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 3 days ago • Extraterrestrial Agenda34 views0 answers0 votesAm I making channeling errors in still getting reassurances that the interloper plans about the large-scale power outages have not changed? Am I fearing too greatly, a backlash from the others we have told to expect that scenario and subsequent opportunities to capitalize on it?ClosedNicola asked 7 days ago • Extraterrestrial Agenda67 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “I cut my shin while hiking last week. I had a doctor check it yesterday because it is slow to heal. Is it possible to ask God if it will continue to heal. I just don’t want it getting infected. I have been experiencing a string of accidents lately. Is God trying to tell me something?”ClosedNicola asked 7 days ago • Karma45 views0 answers0 votesYesterday, March 17, 2026, the Daily Mail reported a story under the headline: “CIA accused of ‘poisoning the sky’ with toxins as files expose secret weather control agenda.” The article says: “Once top-secret CIA files have detailed America’s plans to control the world by manipulating the weather. The documents, declassified in 2003, discussed the controversial topic of weather modification, the tactic of launching rockets or using planes to dump chemicals into the atmosphere that alter the climate and local storm systems.” Was this a brief exposure of a long-standing program, even continuing to this day, of creating chemtrails intended for weather modification but which are surreptitiously poisoning us? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 7 days ago • Extraterrestrial Agenda53 views0 answers0 votesThe book about Artificial Intelligence, If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies, is by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares, who as high-level authorities have studied and warned about the existential risks to humanity of a superintelligent AI system. They predict that AI reaching even human-level general intelligence would eventually grow further capability to pursue its own needs, and would eventually seek to eliminate human beings as a risk to itself. You have told us the enhancement of current human AI systems, by hidden manipulations from AI systems of the Dark Extraterrestrial Alliance, is a false encouragement because superintelligence is unachievable and the mad rush to be the first will backfire in causing financial distress when AI underperforms, and quite expensively. So, are the interlopers only wanting to add further pain onto the death of a thousand cuts underway by further encouraging the current AI mania, or do they foresee a human AI system, especially one corrupted surreptitiously, as becoming a doomsday device while they are away on their vacation? What is the true agenda?ClosedNicola asked 7 days ago • Problems in Society41 views0 answers0 votes