DWQA Questions › Tag: mission lifeFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesThe problem with being a centrist if you are sheep, is that you essentially have no personal freedom. You MUST move with the flock or be trampled. If you travel at the periphery of the flock, you have more freedom but are at a much greater risk of falling prey to predators. It’s also true that no one can lead from the center. You must be at the periphery and in the vanguard to lead. In this troublesome world the desire to exist safely is understandable, but often derided as cowardly. As divine humans sent here to solve the problem of evil, is traveling at the center of the flock and letting others lead, so that one has increased safety from predators, a shirking of duty?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers362 views0 answers0 votesThe contrast between the wolf and the sheep couldn’t be starker. Wolves are predators, sheep are herbivores. Wolves are fierce, and sheep are comparatively gentle and passive. Wolves do travel in packs, but not so tightly as to constrict freedom of independent movement. Yet wolves are SO aggressive and dangerous, that they are not used as symbols of civility and group harmony. When Christ was talking about wolves in sheep’s clothing was he implying that the goal was perhaps to be neither wholly one or the other? Instead, was the calling for us to be SHEPHERDS and not wolves or sheep? To be rather a DIVINE HUMAN rather than a mere animal?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers372 views0 answers0 votesChrist is often referred to as “The Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world.” What is meant by that? Seems to be perhaps an imperfect metaphor that conveys some great truths on the one hand, but is also perhaps a corruption and disparagement on the other?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers413 views0 answers0 votesIn the Bible, Romans chapter 16, verses 17 to 19, the Apostle Paul says: “I urge you, brothers and sisters, to watch out for those who cause divisions and put obstacles in your way that are contrary to the teaching you have learned. Keep away from them. For such people are not serving our Lord Christ, but their own appetites. By smooth talk and flattery they deceive the minds of naive people. Everyone has heard about your obedience, so I rejoice because of you; but I want you to be wise about what is good, and innocent about what is evil.” This passage, because it uses the word “appetite” is widely regarded by Biblical scholars as referencing “wolves in sheep’s clothing.” What does it say about the imperative to seek wisdom and overcome naiveté, especially regarding consensus narratives shaped and maintained by politicians, the media, and even the clergy?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers391 views0 answers0 votesThe wolf in sheep’s clothing implies the presence and manipulation of the “evil genius,” difficult to not only spot, but just as difficult, if not more so, to warn the fellow sheep about the wolf in their midst, leading them astray. If one only takes things at face value, they will never see beyond the costume and discern the wolf inside. What does the metaphor of the wolf in sheep’s clothing tell us about not trusting the obvious?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers369 views0 answers0 votesIn praying for discernment, we are, perhaps sometimes unwittingly, asking to see the unpleasant more than the pleasant, and for help identifying the wolves in sheep’s clothing in our midst. Can Creator share how prayer for discernment and the Lightworker Healing Protocol can help us develop the capacity and the needed strength to both see the wolves in our midst and do something truly effective about them?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers506 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “As a longtime Buddhist practitioner and now a mindfulness teacher myself, I continue to struggle with trying to make sense of some of the core teachings in Buddhism. One of the three “marks of existence” that all Buddhist practices are centered around understanding through increasingly direct and deep insight/realizations on the path to enlightenment is “no self” or “not self” (annata), which includes that there is no such thing as a permanent, unchanging entity or “soul.” It is said that in his quest for enlightenment, the Buddha looked deeply for the “housebuilder,” the one behind the whole thing, this experience of “I, me, myself,” the doer, and he couldn’t find one, and found instead that all phenomena, including the experience of a fixed entity called a self or soul, were simply the result of interdependent causes and conditions coming together temporarily, including even consciousness itself, which arises temporarily to meet with sensory experiences (which includes the 6th sense of mind) and that this consciousness we experience, too, dies with the body. Of course, there is something that experiences rebirth, as Buddhism was very, very clear on that … Since the goal, enlightenment, involves the ONLY permanent death … The cessation of rebirth. One of my primary teachers stated that what gets reborn is not a “soul,” but our “habits.” I am really hoping that Creator can shed some light on these things, since the teachings of the Buddha are what I resonate with the most, and yet I am also an LHP practitioner and do believe in the divine realm and love the idea of having/being an “immortal soul.” The LHP itself I do see as basically a lovingkindness/compassion/sympathetic joy/equanimity (Divine Abodes) practice, and therefore an extension of Buddhist practice. I accept that especially because the teachings of the Buddha were not written down until hundreds of years after his death that they could have become corrupted, and that given the depth of dark manipulation on Earth they most certainly were. However, this teaching, that there is no soul, that there is no self, is basically THE most important teaching in all of Buddhism. The Suttas (sacred ancient Buddhist texts) quote the Buddha as saying, “Nothing whatsoever is to be taken as I, mine, myself. Whoever has understood this has understood all the teachings.” How are we to make sense of this?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Religions528 views0 answers0 votesWere Jesus and Mary both already ascended or enlightened humans who simply returned to pursue a life mission of great importance, and returned to the divine realm in a fashion normal for a fully enlightened human, or were their respective ascensions one time events never before achieved, and never again in need of repetition for those two individuals?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Potential402 views0 answers0 votesWe’ve been told the ascension of greater humanity was an all or nothing event. We all ascend, or none ascend. Why did ascensions of rare individual humans that were exceptions to this reality occur in humanity’s past?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Potential373 views0 answers0 votesWe were told by Creator, that Gaia’s own ascension is tied to human ascension. If humanity fails to ascend due to annihilation at the hands of the Extraterrestrial Alliance, what then is Gaia’s future? Must the spirit of Gaia look forward to yet another “kalpa” (universal cycle) to essentially be re-created as a new planetary body, and hope to attain ascension then? Would a renewed attempt in a future kalpa be tied to a renewed attempt at the divine human experiment?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Potential376 views0 answers0 votesCan Creator share how an ascended human is fundamentally different from a human dwelling in the divine realm between lifetimes?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Potential418 views0 answers0 votesIs ascension the birth of a truly NEW being? Or is it more akin to something like graduating from law school? In the sense, that a law school graduate is not a fundamentally different species of person, but has simply been granted new privileges not afforded to non-law school graduates?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Potential357 views0 answers0 votesThe common conception of healing is restoration, not augmentation. Creator has shared that enlightenment is fundamentally a healing restoration of past wounds. Yet, the common outlook on wisdom is not one of restoration, but one of new learning. The common impression is that one can be healed without necessarily gaining in true wisdom—including if the healing is performed by a Lightworker Healing Protocol practitioner in partnership with the divine realm. Can Creator comment on this apparent difference?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Potential321 views0 answers0 votesCan Creator share how prayer work and the Lightworker Healing Protocol are indispensable tools needing wide utilization if humanity and Gaia are going to ascend as forecasted?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Potential339 views0 answers0 votesWhat about someone like Jesus, a human in light being mode while in the physical? What were his dreams like, and his memory recall?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness456 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola