DWQA Questions › Tag: powerFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesSusy Smith wrote: “During altar calls, when people may be lined up awaiting healing or Baptism in the Holy Spirit, there are numerous accounts of foreign languages having been spoken that were recognized by someone present as bringing him a specific message. The Reverend Dennis Bennett, an Episcopal charismatic leader who has been in the movement since 1960, and his wife, Rita, give a good instance in their book, The Holy Spirit and You. They tell of a young Christian who had married a Japanese girl while stationed in Japan with the armed forces. Having returned to the United States with his bride, he took her to a Full Gospel Church in Oregon, but she prayed her Buddhist prayers even while he was praying to God through Jesus Christ. ‘Next to them was kneeling a middle-aged woman, a housewife from the community,’ the Bennetts say. This woman began to pray aloud in tongues, and the Japanese bride suddenly seized her husband’s arm. ‘Listen!’ she whispered in excitement. ‘This woman speak to me in Japanese! She say to me: “You have tried Buddha and he does you no good; why don’t you try Jesus Christ?” She does not speak to me in ordinary Japanese language, she speak temple Japanese, and use my whole Japanese name, which no one in this country knows!’ It is not surprising that this young lady became a Christian!” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • Divine Realm29 views0 answers0 votesSusy Smith wrote: “Another illustration of tongue-speaking that brings a message to someone who is least expecting it is related by Harold Hill in his book, How to Live Like a King’s Kid. He writes: ‘When another man came and sat in the prayer chair, I laid hands on him and prayed for him in the Spirit, praying in tongues. When the prayer was over, the scoffer (a man standing nearby and skeptically watching) was blubbering like a baby, crying up a storm, slobbering all over his expensive blue serge suit. “What ails you?” I asked. “Well,” he said, “I don’t know if the man in the chair got anything, but God spoke to me when you prayed for him, because you were praying in High German. I’m a student of High German, and I doubt if even you know it, because it’s a rare language.” I said, “I don’t know any German, high, low or medium.” “Well,” he said, “Who are you to scoff at my gifts?” And that big blubbering man got saved.'” What is Creator’s perspective, and how does this fit within the Divine Rules of Engagement, since the recipient was characterized as a “scoffer?” Why did he get this miracle and not the scores of diehard atheists and skeptics also scoffing at this?ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • Divine Realm92 views0 answers0 votesSusy Smith wrote: “Don Basham tells in his book, Handbook on Tongues: Interpretation & Prophecy, of a man he knew was the speaker at a Christian meeting: ‘At one point he stopped his message and began speaking in tongues. This was immediately followed by an interpretation of the tongue by someone in the audience. Then the man resumed his message. After the service, a Frenchman came up to the speaker and told him that the message in tongues was in the French language and that the interpretation that followed had been a perfect translation in English of what had been spoken in French. But neither the speaker nor interpreter knew any French.'” It should be noted that these miracles tend to occur in an atmosphere of expectation where, in some settings, they may even be commonplace. Certainly, they have tremendous persuasive value for both the faithful and curious newcomers. But outside the doors of these churches, they don’t get much airplay. And most who experience these moments are likely hesitant to talk about them for fear of appearing silly. Given the fundamental and dogmatic leanings of most of these churches, it seems like these miracles are not being targeted for greatest effect. In fact, they appear to reinforce the insular cul-de-sac nature of these churches as be-all and end-all establishments when, in fact, in some ways, they might be contributing to an ultimate disempowerment of humanity at the same time they fill a void for the individuals involved. Do they, in effect, keep people stuck circling the airport in a holding pattern? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • Divine Realm94 views0 answers0 votesFor the apostles, speaking in tongues was a means to an end. A means by which the same message could be delivered to people of diverse languages. But today, speaking in tongues seems to have become an end in itself, that somehow speaking in tongues is emblematic of “being in the spirit,” “of being saved,” “of being accepted by Jesus,” and if you are not speaking in tongues, you are not among the favored of the Lord. Have we missed the point? Susy Smith wrote, “St. Paul said, ‘For he that speaketh in an unknown tongue speaketh not unto men, but unto God; for no man understandeth him …'” What problem is that solving? Creator has said in past channelings that many church gatherings have value in that they can effectively create a “group high” and, indeed, lift the moods of those involved, but secular music concerts can accomplish the same thing. And no one considers someone exalting in a popular entertainer’s music as “God’s elect.” Just because it feels good doesn’t mean growth is occurring, that the world is improving, and that things are going to get better. Now, there is nothing wrong with a good “group high,” but is it “moving the needle” in the effort to save humanity the way it needs to move? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • Divine Realm101 views0 answers0 votesIronically, though Susy Smith set out to write a book that largely promulgates the message, “Let go and let God,” she finished the book with a warning that ALL should take to heart. She wrote, “Although the illustrations I have to offer involve demented people who have undoubtedly become possessed by evil spirits or satanic influences, others who are not at all deranged, may be self-deluded by their religious fervor and do things their intelligence should advise against, because they believe, ‘God told me to do it,’ or ‘Jesus asked me.’ Quite the most appalling thing that I know about personally, occurred to a Lutheran minister friend of mine. … On Thanksgiving morning, this pastor was conducting a religious service in a new chapel he had recently built on his home property. His wife … his two daughters and his mother-in-law, and a psychotic patient he was treating along with other neighbors and friends were in attendance. While the pastor was praying, his eyes closed and his Bible in his hands, the patient pulled out a huge, sharp knife and slashed the pastor’s throat, nearly decapitating him. … The most impossibly horrible thing about this was that all the time he was killing my friend, the man was shouting, ‘Praise the Lord’ and ‘I’m doing this for Jesus.'” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • Divine Realm88 views0 answers0 votesSpeaking in tongues once served a critical need, which arguably is no longer needed due to the modern advent of Internet communications and even real-time translation software and utilities. The language barrier that has existed since shortly after the reseeding of humanity some 200,000 years ago, and encapsulated in the biblical Tower of Babel story, is firmly coming down. Language is no longer a barrier in our modern world. Therefore, as remarkable and inspiring as speaking in tongues is, it just isn’t needed like it once was. And it certainly isn’t needed if, as St. Paul put it, “no man understandeth him.” So what IS needed? Can Creator tell us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are the tools we need now to be in divine alignment and save humanity?ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • Divine Realm109 views0 answers0 votesMuch has been said about the Divine Rules of Engagement since the beginning of the Get Wisdom Project, and viewers are encouraged to review the copious material on GetWisdom.com, especially the searchable Divine Wisdom Database. In this show, we aim to explore novel questions, in the hope of bringing forward new insights and understandings about how the divine interacts with the physical universe and humanity in particular. Creator has shared that the future survival of humanity as a species depends on successfully triggering and launching a mass Ascension to a new “Ascended Earth” that Christ and the divine realm are preparing for and anticipating. One of the many new attainments when this has been achieved is a new level of behavioral and creative freedom never before afforded to an entire species of light beings. New freedoms essentially mean New Rules of Engagement. The question is, will those new rules apply only to life on Ascended Earth, or to new worlds and creations brought about by Ascended Humanity, or will these new rules apply to ALL of present creation? Will Ascended Humans have greater freedom to interact with physical beings and spirits stuck in limbo than is now the case with members of the divine realm presently? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • Divine Realm37 views0 answers0 votesShortly after Christ’s resurrection, he is said to have ascended to heaven in his physical body, and this was witnessed by several individuals who have shared their testimony. Did anything change for HIM as a result of this attainment, so far as the rules of engagement are concerned? Is he still bound by the same rules of engagement in place before his Ascension, or is he able to operate under the NEW rules anticipated for Ascended Humanity on a new Ascended Earth? If not, does he have to wait for the mass Ascension itself before he can operate under new rules of engagement, like everyone else? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • Divine Realm117 views0 answers0 votesSuccessful Hollywood Film Producer Paul Davids and Dr. Gary Schwartz of the University of Arizona, who has spent much of his career scientifically studying whether human consciousness survives death and if mediumship is authentic, have co-authored a 2016 book entitled An Atheist in Heaven. Paul Davids was good friends with the late Forrest J. Ackerman who is the subject atheist of the book. Forrest was known for saying he did not believe in life after death, but if it turned out he was wrong, he would “drop them a line.” It turns out Forrest (known to his friends as “Forry”) ended up dropping many lines to many people, as the book shares in great detail. One such incident was with a filmmaker from Canada who attended Forry’s memorial service. Afterwards, this filmmaker went to Forry’s crypt and knocked on the marble, saying out loud, “Uncle Forry, hi, it’s us, Michael and Ian, we’ve come to show our movie about you at the tribute for you.” They returned to their hotel room where Mike wanted to update a Facebook blog. This required a CAPTCHA code readable by humans but not computers. To Michael’s astonishment, the code that came up was “Ackerman000.” Michael felt this was a direct response to knocking on Forry’s crypt. A few moments later, Michael’s friend Ian blurted out, “Is he really dead?” The following sentence is verbatim from the book: “At that moment, the second phenomenon occurred, this time from Ian’s computer. A voice blurted out the words, ‘Oh my God, no way!'” Was Forry doing this? Was he in the light at the time, or still in limbo? And how does all this fit within the rules of engagement? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • Divine Realm116 views0 answers0 votesWhile researching this topic, Brian was watching the documentary film by Paul Davids, The Life After Death Project. On a coffee table next to Brian was his iPad in sleep mode. Suddenly, the iPad woke up spontaneously out of sleep mode, and a childlike voice blurted out the words, “I think you’re pretty great, too!” The iPad promptly went back into sleep mode. Brian immediately recognized how this was a nearly identical incident that occurred to filmmaker Ian described in the question just discussed. The voice was described as “childlike” in that occurrence as well. Years ago, in the 1980s, Brian was doing some experimental channeling with a friend when the spirit being channeled told Brian, “You have the opportunity to be great …” Was Forry referring to that channeling from decades ago? Why would Forry think Brian was “pretty great, too?” When Forry got to the light, did he, too, learn about the Get Wisdom Project and take an interest in it, even reviewing the akashic records of its founders? Did Forry think Brian was “pretty great” because of the Spirit Rescue and Lightworker Healing Protocol session work he did for him? What can Creator tell us about this occurrence, why those words were chosen, and how it all fits into the rules of engagement?ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • Divine Realm30 views0 answers0 votesIn 2015, a séance was held in Forry’s former home, affectionately known as the “Ackermansion,” where Forry was a huge collector of Science Fiction memorabilia and essentially ran an informal museum of sorts when he lived there. Forrest Ackerman invented the term “Sci-fi” and was the founder and editor of the famous film genre magazine, Famous Monsters of Filmland, which was a huge favorite with teenagers in the late fifties and sixties. Steven Spielberg is counted among those who thought Forry was “pretty great.” He inspired an entire generation of famous filmmakers, authors, and special effects wizards. In that séance, it was asked what he (Forry) and other spirits were doing with their time. From the book, “What big project are they working on? Well, one must expend much energy to communicate with us (us incarnate humans that is), or to try to make their presence known, although the interest in communicating with us is substantial. So they, on the other side, are actively doing research, looking for ways to make communication between us and them easier and more efficient.” Were all the spirits attending that séance, including Forry Ackerman, still in limbo? For if they were in the light, they would know the rules of engagement, and that direct communication between spirits and humans was something strictly limited as it interferes with free will, and especially the free will of doubters to embrace their disbelief without overwhelming proof forcing the removal of all skepticism. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • Divine Realm95 views0 answers0 votesAfter reviewing Karl Mollison’s channeling of James Randi and Whitney Houston about their experiences with being stuck in limbo after they passed, it seems clear that the experience is not always “uniform.” Indeed, the experience and intensity of the negativity can vary from individual to individual. We’ve learned in the past that some human lost soul spirits actually attach themselves to the energy field of living humans and find some genuine protection and sanctuary from predation there. After encountering the séance results above, about “spirit groups” working together in what still appears to be limbo or the lower astral plane, is it the case that like-minded spirits band together and form “in limbo” teams or communities? Given the otherwise very negative nature of the lower astral plane, especially the fact that it is home to nefarious spirits of all kinds, banding together would seem to make some sense. In the same way it’s safer to walk through a bad neighborhood with a group of people rather than alone, does the same hold true for the lower astral plane and those stuck in it? Is there safety in numbers? Do such groups or teams or communities exist, and if so, how do they help to alter or make lower astral plane living more palatable, if at all? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • Divine Realm60 views0 answers0 votesIn the book, An Atheist in Heaven, Paul Davids writes about interviewing “arch skeptic” Dr. Michael Shermer, executive director of The Skeptics Society, and founding publisher of Skeptic magazine. Dr. Gary Schwartz, in the same book, characterized Dr. Shermer as a “Type II skeptic.” He writes, “Sadly, there are individuals who claim to be ‘skeptics’ who are not open minded. They do not engage in careful questioning. They are not discerning in their evaluation of evidence. Though they may claim – often insistently – that they are undecided and seek the truth, in practice they are disbelievers or ‘unbelievers.’ They hold strong beliefs about what must be impossible. Furthermore, they often engage in irresponsible and unjustified evaluation of theories, methods, findings, and conclusions which challenge their convictions about what is possible in nature and the cosmos. This is pseudo-skepticism. I call this ‘Type II Skepticism.'” During his interview with Paul Davids, Dr. Michael Shermer certainly came off as a “Type II Skeptic.” However, later in the book, and just before it was published, Dr. Shermer ended up having his own very “mysterious” experience that he confessed “shook his skepticism.” He was getting married and his bride had an old transistor radio that belonged to her deceased grandfather that hadn’t worked in decades. New batteries didn’t help – the radio was dead. On their wedding day, his bride said she wanted to say something to him alone, so they went to the back of the house where they heard music playing in the bedroom. They opened a drawer and found her grandfather’s radio playing a romantic love song. Other family members reported the music started playing just as the wedding was to begin. The next day, the radio went silent and never worked again. Dr. Shermer’s bride was reportedly a skeptic as well, so how could this happen within the rules of engagement, especially since we know the divine realm will go to great lengths to protect the beliefs of skeptics? So much so that just the presence of James Randi, for example, could literally temporarily disable the intuitive abilities of those around him? What can Creator tell us about this radio at the wedding event and how it all fits within the rules of engagement? Was the bride’s grandfather still in limbo?ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • Divine Realm51 views0 answers0 votesDr. Gary Schwarz reported in the book, An Atheist in Heaven, that even after decades of research and seven books he wrote on the topic, he still struggled believing it all! He wrote, “In my case, being a well-trained skeptical thinker and well-educated disbeliever in the possibility of an afterlife, I had this strong, uncontrollable emotional reactive habit of automatically assuming that anyone who believed in life after death was naive, ignorant, stupid, brainwashed, prejudiced, delusional and/or crazy. This emotional reaction was clearly inconsistent with the emerging theory … and research. I experienced increasing conflict between what the emerging theory and research were teaching me versus my growing fear that if I accepted the theory and research, that maybe I was becoming ‘brainwashed’ by the theory and evidence, and I was even ‘losing my mind.’ I came to realize that I was like one of Pavlov’s classically conditioned dogs who automatically salivated to the sound of a bell. Dogs do not automatically salivate when they hear a bell ringing, and neither do we.” This confession by Dr. Schwartz is both revealing and disturbing. How could it possibly be that decades of research and validation could not successfully alter his emotions? How could he still harbor fear? Is all Type II Skepticism ultimately a FEAR reaction? Was the origin of Dr. Schwartz’s inexplicable emotions, even after decades, wholly originating with his deep subconscious? If so, it certainly reinforces Creator’s assertions that there is little short of divine intervention, via the Lightworker Healing Protocol and Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, that we can do to alter beliefs in the deep subconscious. What can Creator tell us about Dr. Schwartz’s struggle, and what lessons can we draw from it?ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • Divine Realm18 views0 answers0 votesDr. Gary Schwartz provided another deeply mysterious observation about himself in the book. He wrote, “It is now Alice in Wonderland time. For many people, it is having … direct personal experiences which leads us to change our minds. However, if a phenomenon is novel, challenging, and especially if it is ‘seemingly unbelievable,’ then having a direct personal experience with the phenomenon is often essential. And for certain phenomena, there is no substitute for experiencing it ourselves. … What I have discovered is that the more unbelievable events are replicated, the greater the level of disbelief one may experience. Often the so-called boggle factor does not decrease with replication, it actually increases. This increased disbelief is not rational; it is emotional. Replication and validation are cornerstones of the scientific method. On the one hand, with each replication we are more convinced that the phenomenon is real, and yet simultaneously the phenomenon feels more unbelievable and seemingly impossible. If any single ‘formally physical person’ illustrates this emotional boggle factor, it is Forry. As the empirical evidence accumulated, the case for Forry being alive and well became stronger and stronger, and yet simultaneously the evidence became more and more difficult to believe.” What is Creator’s perspective on this dilemma and conundrum?ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • Divine Realm43 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola