DWQA Questions › Tag: regret
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A practitioner asks: “I’m finding that with the clarity that comes from the healing through the protocols, there are also a lot of feelings of shame, guilt and embarrassment about the past as well as a lot of “could haves,” “should haves,” and “would haves.” At the moment, I feel like I’m just reliving everything in my head and I’m finding it difficult to focus on the present moment and enjoying the healing changes that the protocols have brought about. Being mindful and communing with Creator helps but it’s difficult to do this at all times, especially when at work or busy. There’s constant fear and worry and fear of judgement from others about past mistakes even though, in the grand scheme of things, the mistakes I’ve made haven’t been that bad. I understand that I’m coming from a different starting point that makes me feel different from others and why I’ve often been isolated and alone, so I’m guessing that I’m lacking in the general life experience that others have to move on from past mistakes. I’d like to be as fighting fit as possible for what is to come in the days ahead without fear that my mind will be full of worry about things that don’t really matter. Can Creator offer advice on what to focus on as a healing need in the protocols to help with this, to strengthen soul attributes and change beliefs and programming to be able to deal with the past and move on from the leftover guilt and shame?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • 
39 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Can Creator offer advice or a tutorial on what to do and how to best manage the fear and doubt and regret in our minds while growing and becoming stronger from what we have experienced, especially with the revelations and changes, and hopefully healing, that is coming soon? As events come to pass, I imagine that a lot of people will be feeling similar to how I feel now.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • 
38 views0 answers0 votes
In the book Thirty Years Among the Dead by Dr. Carl Wickland, Mrs. Wickland channeled her deceased childhood friend, Mrs. Lacklund, shortly after she passed. Mrs. Lacklund said, “Insanity is nothing but obsession by spirits who are sent to the spirit side of life without understanding the truth of God.” Is it really true that insanity is “NOTHING BUT” obsession by spirits? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
212 views0 answers0 votes
Also in the book Thirty Years Among the Dead by Dr. Carl Wickland, the experience of a sensitive young man is shared. This young man had established himself in business with his father when one morning, he rose early and left home. He just up and vanished. The distraught parents reached out to Dr. Wickland for help. Wickland’s team prayed that the boy “should have no rest until he wrote his parents.” The following morning, he wrote to them, saying he was in the Navy and would be gone for several years. Dr. Wickland’s team did more prayer/concentration work, and the spirit of a deceased sailor longing to return to the sea was channeled by Mrs. Wickland. The spirit reported that “lots of people brought me here” to be channeled by Mrs. Wickland. Can Creator share with us why the boy was so vulnerable to this kind of takeover? The sailor spirit was not particularly evil, but was self-centered and very focused on returning to sea. It was said that the boy in the question above was “sensitive to spirit influence.” Aren’t we ALL? To one degree or another? What was it about the boy, and all of us for that matter, that make us “sensitive” to spirit influence versus “not sensitive” or at least “not so sensitive?” What percentage of the human population has had a takeover as this boy experienced? Due to the effective action, from a considerable distance, of the boy’s parents, Dr. Wickland and his team, including his gifted medium wife, the boy was freed from the spirit and eventually reunited with his family. The family was even successful in arranging an early discharge from the Navy—something not at all easy to accomplish. How does this distance release accomplished through prayer show us how the Lightworker Healing Protocol works to accomplish similar outcomes? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
139 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Wickland, being a practicing psychiatrist, was able to use electroshock treatments with his patients. These treatments had the effect of driving spirit attachments out of the victim’s aura, where awaiting “helper” spirits would “assist” this spirit over to Mrs. Wickland’s aura, where they could enter and take temporary control of Mrs. Wickland and therefore speak to Dr. Wickland directly. Wickland would then engage the spirit in direct conversation and attempt to explain to that spirit what had happened to them, and how better to comport themselves and get back on a more progressive spiritual path. He was successful more often than not, but occasionally, truly recalcitrant spirits were simply sent back to “the outer darkness.” Once again, is this a psychokinetic energy contest where the spirit in question is “overpowered” energetically and essentially pushed/forced back aggressively to the “holding place” and away from the victim? Does this all conform to the rules of engagement, or were some of the “helper spirits” taking matters into their own hands in acting like security guards with unruly spirits? When using the Lightworker Healing Protocol, unlike Dr. Wickland, we practitioners are not part of communicating/negotiating with spirit attachments. Do we rather empower the “spirit guides and guardians” to do this with our requests? What happens when the attachment won’t listen and cooperate? Are they sent back to the “holding place?” Is electroshock therapy equally effective against both lost soul human spirits as well as fallen angelic spirit meddlers? Either way, when done without knowledge and understanding, at best, it creates a temporary vacancy, and the attaching spirits simply return once again. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
154 views0 answers0 votes
Electroshock therapy has been widely viewed and labeled as “barbaric.” Yet ironically, it is still in use today. The difference is, now the patient is put under anesthesia before the shocks are administered. But we also know that anesthesia itself makes the recipient MORE PRONE to acquiring spirit attachments! So you drive them out with electroshock, but make it easier than ever for ejected attachments to return with spirit defenses weakened by anesthesia? What can Creator tell us about the limited usefulness of electroshock therapy, why it works “at all,” and how anesthesia makes us more vulnerable to spirit attachments and, even in extreme cases, obsession and even possession? Is there anything equivalent to electroshock that the divine administers when we ask in the protocol to “net all spirits within and around my clients?” Is this a kind of psychokinetic power as opposed to the electricity used in electroshock? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
148 views0 answers0 votes
A methodist minister who was a member of Dr. Wickland’s “team” when alive, channeled through Mrs. Wickland shortly after his passing. He had this to say, “… There is nothing which can harm you if you are not afraid. Fear is what we must avoid; we must develop power. When you develop fear you create conditions of fear around you. You should develop within yourself the power of God, the power to conquer, the power of Love. Then you will conquer, no matter what comes.” He says further, “If you are troubled by obsession, say to yourself: ‘I am master, and nobody else can interfere.’ When you do that you will be free. Do not think of the other one (obsessing spirit) who is trying to bother you. Send out a kind thought to him. Do not send out thoughts of evil because they only hinder your own self. They create more thoughts of anger and you will not have gained anything. Develop within yourself power and strength to conquer.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
139 views0 answers0 votes
It was said in Dr. Wickland’s book that spirits attached to humans can have their OWN set of attachments! How many layers deep can this go? Another thing mentioned was the danger of acquiring attachments that had committed suicide. Oftentimes, these spirits don’t know they were actually successful with their own physical suicide, and don’t even realize they are now “dead” and attached to another human being! As such, they may think their suicide attempt was actually unsuccessful, and in so thinking, will unknowingly transmit their determination to their host and influence them negatively, and in some cases even force them to kill themselves. This is especially the case if the suicidal spirit was an atheist and believed they would simply cease to exist upon the death of the body. In this way, they could be responsible for many suicides of victims before they finally “figure things out” and realize there is no escape from “themselves” in death. Furthermore, many drugs warn of “suicidal thoughts” as a possible adverse side effect. Suicidal thoughts come from CONSCIOUSNESS, not “chemistry.” Do the drugs weaken our spiritual (and even physical) defenses and help attract both suicidal spirits as well as spirit meddlers who like to encourage self-destruction? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
129 views0 answers0 votes
Wikipedia had this to say about The Rosenhan Experiment, conducted by psychologist David L. Rosenhan in the early 1970s, “(The Rosenhan Experiments) investigated the validity of psychiatric diagnoses by examining how mental health professionals identified mental illness. In this controversial study, eight individuals without any psychiatric history feigned auditory hallucinations to gain admission to twelve different mental hospitals across the United States. Despite providing truthful information about their lives and claiming to no longer hear voices, all participants were diagnosed with severe mental disorders, primarily schizophrenia, and remained hospitalized for an average of nineteen days. The study highlighted significant issues within psychiatric institutions, such as the staff’s limited interaction with patients and their tendency to misinterpret normal behavior as symptomatic of mental illness. All but one were released only after agreeing to a mental illness diagnosis and medication, which they flushed down the toilet.” In 1976, a young German woman named Anneliese Michel died after 67 Catholic Exorcisms. The concluded cause of death by the authorities was starvation. Anneliese didn’t think the doctors knew what they were doing, and she knew if she shared too much with them, she would end up in the insane asylum. Her parents and two priests were later convicted of negligent homicide for not turning her over to the state institution, where she would have been force-fed and medicated. What is Creator’s perspective on the “conflict” between the secular and religious responses to obsession, possession, and its symptoms? Were the parents and priests “wrong” in not enlisting the help of secular doctors? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
135 views0 answers0 votes
Anthropologist Felicitas Goodman wrote The Exorcism of Anneliese Michel and the book How About Demons? Possession and Exorcism in the Modern World. Dr. Goodman was convinced that Anneliese was a victim of demonic possession, most likely brought about by a curse rumored to be placed on Anneliese prior to birth solicited and paid for by a woman jealous of Anneliese’s mother. Goodman said that in her experience, nearly all these kinds of possessions were the result of a powerful curse placed by powerful practitioners of the dark arts. Anneliese was a gentle, kind, intelligent, thoughtful individual who seemed like the last person on Earth to “deserve” what happened to her. So much so, in fact, that she and her family came to believe that her plight and suffering were somehow sacrificial and for the benefit of others. Because otherwise, it didn’t make sense to them. Dr. Goodman noted that in Haiti, it is believed that an exorcism will succeed only if the exorcist is more powerful than the one placing the curse. Was this the case with Anneliese as well? Did the exorcisms fail, and Anneliese died because the priests were not as “powerful” as the one who placed the curse? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
138 views0 answers0 votes
The 67 Catholic Exorcisms said by the two priests involved for Anneliese brought at best temporary relief, but in the end were considered a failure due to her unanticipated and tragic death at just 23 years old. Goodman wrote: “Exorcism is basically designed to help the afflicted person to gain ritual control over the molesting entities … Unruly spirits (also) need to and indeed can be trained. Without ritual intervention, the undoing of such a pattern is extremely difficult, especially so if the alter is evil or, in religious terms, if the possessing entity has demonic powers. … It is the only strategy used cross-culturally against demonic possession, and in all instances where it is allowed to work without interference, it is eminently successful. … The worst situation in the West is the one involving demonic possession. Those afflicted by it need help. Exorcism works, other strategies do not, yet their diagnosis and treatment are determined not by what works but by the prevailing attitudes, the paradigm concerning the nature of reality. The position is so ingrained that arguments that religious experience is accompanied by measurable and recordable physiological changes are totally ignored. Finally, it should be noted that Mary, the mother of Jesus, reportedly told Anneliese in a vision she had months in advance that her ordeal would be over on the day she actually died.” What is the divine perspective on this outcome, and were the exorcisms “successful” according to the divine? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
125 views0 answers0 votes
Spirit obsession and possession are bigger problems than most people realize. It’s a problem that spans both life and death, and affects the living and the dead in profound and nearly equal measure. Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are the best and most effective means to resolve this vexing problem from BOTH sides of the physical and post-physical divide?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
117 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer writes: “The latest livestream about Death, Transition, and the Immediate Afterlife gave what had been family lore a sharper focus. I would like to explore the potential current impacts of a tragedy in my family. In the 1920s my grandmother, then 17, was the sole survivor of a car/train wreck that killed her father, two sisters, a cousin, and two aunts. The driver was her father, who had to choose between trusting the brakes or hitting the gas. (Were spirit meddlers involved?)” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
106 views0 answers0 votes
She continues: “My grandmother saved herself by jumping from the car and suffered two broken arms and other injuries and spent considerable time in the hospital. It seems likely that the circumstances had lasting effects on my grandmother and her own family as well as the spirits of the victims. The condition of bodies was described as horribly mutilated, with the cousin being decapitated. Did the condition of the victims have a harmful effect on their transitions?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
111 views0 answers0 votes
She continues: “Did the death circumstances of that car/train wreck make them vulnerable to dark spirit meddlers? Were dark spirits drawn to the extreme carnage?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
87 views0 answers0 votes
123Next »
Ask Question