DWQA QuestionsTag: Scriptures
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
The “spirit meddlers,” as Creator likes to call them, or by other names, “the fallen angels,” or the more menacing label “demons,” are one of humanity’s biggest, if not THE biggest problems there is. Only to be eclipsed, arguably, by the bigger danger presented by the extraterrestrials. Previously, we learned from Creator that the “War in Heaven” among the angels started about 5.6 billion years ago and the so-called “fall” of the evil angels, when they were banished, occurred around 5 billion years ago. Creator mentioned that this event should, ironically, be a cause for optimism because since the time when our galaxy was first populated with physical beings, it remained in balance with angelic oversight for a full 4 billion years prior to the start of the War in Heaven. The one thing that Creator has emphasized, and that even the Catholic Church acknowledges, is that, in this galaxy anyway, the angels have been granted free will as has every other sentient being—physical and nonphysical. Creator has also emphasized that in this galaxy the physical sentient beings granted free will are the ones IN CHARGE. Creator is essentially hands-off and plays only a supportive role. On top of that, the rules of engagement mandate that Creator can intervene directly in galactic affairs only when REQUESTED to do so by a being with standing, and only when the request is in DIVINE ALIGNMENT. This unbendable rule is firmly in place not only for humans but for the angels as well. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
41 views0 answers0 votes
The need for WISDOM is an objective Creator desires for ALL sentient beings. For with the acquisition of true divine wisdom, sentient beings can be SELF-MANAGING successfully. For 4 billion years the angelic beings were successfully self-managing the affairs and needs of the galaxy and its physical beings. Creator was available to consult with them at any time but was hands-off unless requested and the request was in divine alignment. At that point, around 5.6 billion years ago, something went “sideways”—to put it mildly. Creator previously shared that some of the angelics began “strong-arming” physical beings outside of what would be considered divinely aligned management. This created a dilemma for them (knowingly or unknowingly) because karmic debt accrued from their interaction with physical beings, and then required healing requests FROM the physical realm for the divine to be able to successfully intervene. That likely means the prayers of fellow angelics could no longer effectively be used to heal that karmic indebtedness. Additionally, it is assumed that the angels “abusing” the physical environment were increasingly resistant to criticism and correction—coming not so much from Creator but from fellow angelics. If you don’t want to listen to Creator, Creator will remain quiet. But not so their angelic peers. They will not just sit back and watch their fellow angels engage in unacceptable behavior without speaking up and taking action, eventually. It’s likely similar to a dysfunctional family trying to deal with a child that has extreme behavior problems. Eventually, and after all remedies and interventions have been exhausted, such a child will be forced to leave the family and fend for themselves. Does this describe what happened in the run-up to the “fall” of the angels? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
20 views0 answers0 votes
So, if it turns out that Creator is, in fact, NOT infallible, then it becomes possible (though perhaps not likely) that a created being might out-guess Creator on super rare occasions. Not the rule, but a viable exception to the rule on occasion. This sheds light on the dynamics leading up to the fall, because if angels know that Creator is not absolutely infallible, then it’s also POSSIBLE (though not likely) that they could be right and Creator could be wrong about some things. This gets into the region of judgment calls when there are a lot of variables to juggle and consider. Creator has acknowledged that sometimes even Creator must resort to a best guess at times. And when that is the case, a created being’s best guess might on occasion best even Creator! But then it’s not that the created being was necessarily smarter, but arguably just luckier. A lucky guess that beat Creator’s guess. What this suggests is WHY the angels heading for the fall might not have been so quick to listen to and consult with Creator. When truly dealing with the unknown and untried, anyone’s guess, at times, is as good as anyone else’s guess. Perhaps, INCLUDING Creator’s. Opinions vary and being right on occasion doesn’t necessarily prove one is smarter or wiser or more insightful. Yet it is tempting to THINK THAT, especially if one has a more primitive ego. Is that perhaps an explanation for the hubris of the angels leading up to the fall? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
27 views0 answers0 votes
So, what you end up with eventually is an ever-widening difference of opinion between two groups of angels. Those led by Lucifer and those that recruited Michael to be “point guard” or chief negotiator/enforcer for their position. When it eventually became clear to everyone that divorce was imminent, that the two groups could no longer cohabit or co-exist in the same vibration, then it became truly a “war” and a struggle to see who would kick out whom. Sometimes the eventual winner is obvious, but sometimes that is not the case. For ordinary angels, choosing a side might have been a REAL dilemma for them. Especially considering that Lucifer actually outranked Michael and all the so-called “good angels” that were rebelling against HIS (Lucifer’s) appointed authority. People tend to forget that Lucifer actually outranked Michael, so in a real sense Michael was the MUTINEER. It was the good angels that were actually rebelling against Lucifer’s authority and his misuse of it. So, if you’re a rank-and-file angel, how do you choose sides? Do you side with the traditional authority or the REBELLION? It almost always seems safer to stay with the incumbent. The penalty for rebelling and failing is always HARSH. So, might this help us to explain and understand why a THIRD of the angels sided with Lucifer? It didn’t necessarily mean that all of them were bad and evil (at that moment in time anyway), but moreso that they were perhaps unwise and even cowardly, choosing what they erroneously felt was safe over what was right. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
33 views0 answers0 votes