DWQA Questions › Tag: skeptics
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Dr. Gary Schwarz reported in the book, An Atheist in Heaven, that even after decades of research and seven books he wrote on the topic, he still struggled believing it all! He wrote, “In my case, being a well-trained skeptical thinker and well-educated disbeliever in the possibility of an afterlife, I had this strong, uncontrollable emotional reactive habit of automatically assuming that anyone who believed in life after death was naive, ignorant, stupid, brainwashed, prejudiced, delusional and/or crazy. This emotional reaction was clearly inconsistent with the emerging theory … and research. I experienced increasing conflict between what the emerging theory and research were teaching me versus my growing fear that if I accepted the theory and research, that maybe I was becoming ‘brainwashed’ by the theory and evidence, and I was even ‘losing my mind.’ I came to realize that I was like one of Pavlov’s classically conditioned dogs who automatically salivated to the sound of a bell. Dogs do not automatically salivate when they hear a bell ringing, and neither do we.” This confession by Dr. Schwartz is both revealing and disturbing. How could it possibly be that decades of research and validation could not successfully alter his emotions? How could he still harbor fear? Is all Type II Skepticism ultimately a FEAR reaction? Was the origin of Dr. Schwartz’s inexplicable emotions, even after decades, wholly originating with his deep subconscious? If so, it certainly reinforces Creator’s assertions that there is little short of divine intervention, via the Lightworker Healing Protocol and Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, that we can do to alter beliefs in the deep subconscious. What can Creator tell us about Dr. Schwartz’s struggle, and what lessons can we draw from it?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
190 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Gary Schwartz provided another deeply mysterious observation about himself in the book. He wrote, “It is now Alice in Wonderland time. For many people, it is having … direct personal experiences which leads us to change our minds. However, if a phenomenon is novel, challenging, and especially if it is ‘seemingly unbelievable,’ then having a direct personal experience with the phenomenon is often essential. And for certain phenomena, there is no substitute for experiencing it ourselves. … What I have discovered is that the more unbelievable events are replicated, the greater the level of disbelief one may experience. Often the so-called boggle factor does not decrease with replication, it actually increases. This increased disbelief is not rational; it is emotional. Replication and validation are cornerstones of the scientific method. On the one hand, with each replication we are more convinced that the phenomenon is real, and yet simultaneously the phenomenon feels more unbelievable and seemingly impossible. If any single ‘formally physical person’ illustrates this emotional boggle factor, it is Forry. As the empirical evidence accumulated, the case for Forry being alive and well became stronger and stronger, and yet simultaneously the evidence became more and more difficult to believe.” What is Creator’s perspective on this dilemma and conundrum?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
292 views0 answers0 votes
The rules of engagement are certainly there for a reason. But also, arguably, they can be one of the biggest obstacles there is for creating critically needed change in this world. As Creator has said repeatedly, saving humanity is a “Divine Level Problem.” Can Creator tell us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are the tools we need to both work within the rules of engagement but also overcome the obstacles they represent at the same time?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
219 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Does a printed Bible itself radiate healing power which could be used as a “point of contact” between the divine and a physical malady? Acts 19:11-12 is about God granting Paul the power to perform extraordinary miracles through handkerchiefs and aprons that were touched by him. Creator has mentioned that the Bible maintains an energetic connection to Creator and is more than the printed words on the page (a principle which is presumably true for many other major spiritual writings). Is it therefore a healing activity to possess such holy works and read from such holy writings? Is the healing effect amplified by writing out passages by hand or by speaking the words on the page?”
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
289 views0 answers0 votes
Was my colleague’s follow-up channeling about seeing insulation being pulled out near his front door, but no mouse droppings, an accurate explanation, that those signs of a mouse being present for a time were created by you to provide room for doubt?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
314 views0 answers0 votes
Was this an important lesson, that praying to see signs of a miracle may, indeed, be met only half way? Is this a common occurrence? Can some people praying for healing be actually healed in order to extend their lifespan, but still left with symptoms that are actually harmless, even if inconvenient, in order to honor inner doubts of theirs or skeptical observers?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
194 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “There are so many examples in the Old Testament of God’s people killing the inhabitants of lands that they overtook at the Creator’s suggestion or command—every man woman and child. The Israelites were commanded to destroy several nations, including the Canaanites, Amorites, Hittites, Perizzites, Hivites, and Jebusites, as well as the Midianites. These commands are found in Deuteronomy 20:16–17 and Numbers 31:17. In the case of the Midianites, the Israelites were instructed to kill every man, woman, and child, except for the virgin girls, as recorded in Numbers 31. This is not meant to be a comprehensive list of all nations destroyed by the Israelites, but these are prominent examples in the Bible. Were these events truly commanded by God? Who was behind all this killing?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
447 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “I humbly seek Your wisdom on what lies beyond our earthly existence. When our souls leave the physical body and, as I understand, we transition into a new spiritual dimension, will we be able to interact with those who came before us? Will we have the opportunity to speak with figures such as Adam and Eve, or Mary and Jesus, and learn from their earthly journeys? And, beyond this, might we also connect with ancestors we never met in this life, such as great-grandparents or other family members? I seek to understand more about the bonds that transcend time and the connections that await us in Your eternal light. Thank you and I apologize if this or something similar had been asked.”
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
505 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “What are the spiritual and karmic implications of getting tattoos? Would Creator advise against them, or is it mostly inconsequential?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
610 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Why don’t our scientific studies give some credence to belief in your own healing?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
376 views0 answers0 votes
In Dr. Anthony Fauci’s autobiography, he describes a grilling by Senator Rand Paul as the latter’s misunderstanding that gain of function research on viruses is not the same as “gain of function research of concern,” because only the latter includes potentially dangerous manipulations to increase pathogenicity and transmissibility of infectious viruses. Fauci explained what the U.S. funded in the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) was work on bat viruses that were non-infectious in humans, to simply study their properties. Secondly, he points out that the “molecular makeup of the bat viruses studied at the WIV under the NIAID/EHA grant was genetically so different from SARS-CoV-2 that they could not possibly be the source of SARS-CoV-2.” Is that an accurate description by Fauci and not a minimization or deceptive misstatement of fact?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
314 views0 answers0 votes
Was the condemnation and inflammatory attack on Fauci by Senator Rand Paul orchestrated through mind control manipulation by the Extraterrestrial Alliance to provide a false narrative, and was that picked up and reported many times by Fox News commentators without careful review and analysis because of mind control manipulation to create a cover story for appearance of what is actually an extraterrestrial viral creation?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
365 views0 answers0 votes
Fauci criticized Dr. Scott Atlas, a Stanford professor advising the Trump administration, for stating the current public health measures were overkill and recommending the following: 1. “Schools should be fully reopened because COVID was not a serious threat to children and they did not transmit the virus efficiently even if they got infected.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
344 views0 answers0 votes
Fauci criticized Dr. Scott Atlas, a Stanford professor advising the Trump administration, for stating the current public health measures were overkill and recommending the following: 2. “COVID would run its course no matter what actions were taken.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
351 views0 answers0 votes
Fauci criticized Dr. Scott Atlas, a Stanford professor advising the Trump administration, for stating the current public health measures were overkill and recommending the following: 3. “Only the symptomatic should be tested.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
318 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous12345…17Next »
Ask Question