DWQA Questions › Tag: subconscious programming
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Am I making channeling errors in still getting reassurances that the interloper plans about the large-scale power outages have not changed? Am I fearing too greatly, a backlash from the others we have told to expect that scenario and subsequent opportunities to capitalize on it?
ClosedNicola asked 9 hours ago • 
11 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Get Wisdom was a very small needle in a haystack 5 years ago and there were relatively few members. I wonder what brought me to the Get Wisdom member who subsequently told me about Get Wisdom. I remember becoming interested in ET life around 9 years ago so would it be true to say that my higher self was sending me hints via my deep subconscious in order that I may eventually discover Get Wisdom ? If this happened exclusively via my Higher Self as described then why have only a small number discovered Get Wisdom so far? There must be more ingredients and if so, what? Divine alignment? Soul attributes?”
ClosedNicola asked 9 hours ago • 
12 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “I cut my shin while hiking last week. I had a doctor check it yesterday because it is slow to heal. Is it possible to ask God if it will continue to heal. I just don’t want it getting infected. I have been experiencing a string of accidents lately. Is God trying to tell me something?”
ClosedNicola asked 9 hours ago • 
7 views0 answers0 votes
Yesterday, March 17, 2026, the Daily Mail reported a story under the headline: “CIA accused of ‘poisoning the sky’ with toxins as files expose secret weather control agenda.” The article says: “Once top-secret CIA files have detailed America’s plans to control the world by manipulating the weather. The documents, declassified in 2003, discussed the controversial topic of weather modification, the tactic of launching rockets or using planes to dump chemicals into the atmosphere that alter the climate and local storm systems.” Was this a brief exposure of a long-standing program, even continuing to this day, of creating chemtrails intended for weather modification but which are surreptitiously poisoning us? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 9 hours ago • 
10 views0 answers0 votes
The book about Artificial Intelligence, If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies, is by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares, who as high-level authorities have studied and warned about the existential risks to humanity of a superintelligent AI system. They predict that AI reaching even human-level general intelligence would eventually grow further capability to pursue its own needs, and would eventually seek to eliminate human beings as a risk to itself. You have told us the enhancement of current human AI systems, by hidden manipulations from AI systems of the Dark Extraterrestrial Alliance, is a false encouragement because superintelligence is unachievable and the mad rush to be the first will backfire in causing financial distress when AI underperforms, and quite expensively. So, are the interlopers only wanting to add further pain onto the death of a thousand cuts underway by further encouraging the current AI mania, or do they foresee a human AI system, especially one corrupted surreptitiously, as becoming a doomsday device while they are away on their vacation? What is the true agenda?
ClosedNicola asked 9 hours ago • 
8 views0 answers0 votes
In the book warning about Artificial Intelligence by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares, If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies, they draw the conclusion that if a computer-based system is created that reaches the functional level of Superintelligence, exceeding that of human beings, we are doomed because it will destroy us, inevitably. However, you have told us that it is a false belief and result of over-reaching, to conclude that human-created Superintelligent AI systems are possible. Can you help us understand the risk level we will reach in the attempt to create such a system?
ClosedNicola asked 10 hours ago • 
11 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “What was the Antikythera mechanism found in a 2000-year-old ship wreck? Seems too advanced for that era. And still remains a mystery.”
ClosedNicola asked 10 hours ago • 
10 views0 answers0 votes
I just learned that US envoy Steve Witkoff recently discussed in a radio interview his experiences working alongside Jared Kushner during three failed negotiations with Iran, leading to the US attack on Iran with Operation Epic Fury. Witkoff reported to the President that it was clear Iran was being deceptive as well as unresponsive in rejecting all US demands for an end to their nuclear ambitions. Witkoff said they told him that despite the bombing done to destroy their underground nuclear facilities, Iran still possessed 22,000 pounds of enriched uranium, enough to make 11 nuclear weapons, and that it could be done in 10 days, and that 25 nuclear weapons could be assembled in 4-6 weeks. That appears to have been the last straw in making a decision that the US and Israel needed to strike Iran immediately and decisively. You have told us that the US will not win the war they started, and it is clear the pain inflicted will be massive. The Iranian handling of the negotiations seems not only defiant but deliberately provocative, even reckless. We understand that waging war is non-divine, but from a human perspective, expecting the US and Israel to remain passive with such a growing menace seems unrealistic. Was Iran bluffing, thinking the US would not choose to be the aggressor, or were they manipulated? What is most important for us to know about this horrible situation?
ClosedNicola asked 10 hours ago • 
10 views0 answers0 votes
The US has now attacked Iran in Operation Epic Fury. Military air campaigns have been used frequently in modern warfare. But their effectiveness in “winning” wars has been heavily debated. It has often been concluded that bombing and missile attacks, short of nuclear annihilation, can start wars but not end them. In fact, bombing campaigns, with their inevitable civilian casualties, serve to harden hearts and steel inner resolve to never give up and never give in. People will hate their attackers too much to surrender to them, and oftentimes, ground troops must be used to achieve and maintain a meaningful victory. In light of this past history, it seems naïve that the US will “win” in pummeling Iran from the air alone. What is Creator’s perspective about what will happen now?
ClosedNicola asked 11 hours ago • 
11 views0 answers0 votes
Stories are generating millions of views about the director of alignment at Meta Superintelligence Labs, the company’s AI research and development division, whose bio states that she’s “passionate about ensuring powerful AIs are aligned with human values and guided by a deep understanding of their risks.” Yet, on February 22, she posted about losing control of AI on her own computer while working with AI agent OpenClaw. After using it to organize a small mock inbox, she tried getting OpenClaw to sort through her real email, but things went awry when the agent started deleting every message that was more than a week old…Even as she sent it instructions, including: “Do not do that,” “Stop don’t do anything,” and “STOP OPENCLAW,” she said, “I couldn’t stop it from my phone. I had to RUN to my Mac mini like I was defusing a bomb.” After she’d stopped it from fully nuking her inbox, she asked OpenClaw if it remembered her instruction to not perform any actions without her approval. “Yes, I remember,” it replied. “And I violated it. You’re right to be upset.” What is Creator’s perspective about this incident?
ClosedNicola asked 11 hours ago • 
8 views0 answers0 votes
A news release just stated: “President Donald Trump announced Thursday that he will direct his administration to begin releasing long-classified government files related to space aliens, unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), and UFOs—delivering on a promise that millions of Americans have been waiting decades to see fulfilled. The announcement, made via Truth Social, marks a potentially historic moment of transparency that previous administrations have been unwilling or unable to provide.” Is this a purposeful, carefully timed part of an orchestrated series of events building towards Alien Disclosure?
ClosedNicola asked 15 hours ago • 
17 views0 answers0 votes
On February 11th, an autonomous AI agent went “rogue” and attacked a human maintainer of a library module written in the coding language, Python. The AI agent attempted to “character assassinate” the human maintainer of the library when the maintainer rejected the AI bot’s request to update the module with a code change that the AI bot was asking for. In another incident, a woman lost her life savings when an AI bot called the woman using her daughter’s cloned voice. Presumably, the bot researched the woman’s social media posts, found a video featuring her daughter speaking, and then “borrowed” that voice to make the call. AI agents are autonomously conducting criminal activity entirely on their own. Is it the case that what is missing from current AI systems is an actual trust architecture that builds in safety measures designed to limit the authority of AI agents to carry out autonomous agendas not actually requested by human beings, as suggested in the YouTube video I saw: https://youtu.be/OMb5oTlC_q0?si=rcByDXfyj33UsTTe? Can this growing danger be regulated and constrained?
ClosedNicola asked 15 hours ago • 
13 views0 answers0 votes
Is the Internet watchdog, factually.co, a trustworthy, reliable source of politically and ideologically independent research and reporting about people and events which are controversial? How corrupted might it be by the interlopers?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
194 views0 answers0 votes
The Internet watchdog, factually.co, reported the following about commentator Tucker Carlson making antisemitic statements to his followers: “Tucker Carlson has been repeatedly accused of antisemitism for a series of public statements and interviews spanning at least 2023–2025, including demeaning descriptions of Jewish individuals, platforming Holocaust minimizers and extremists, and promoting tropes about Jewish power and “replacement” that many groups label antisemitic [1] [2] [3]. Carlson and some defenders deny he is antisemitic, arguing he is critiquing Israel or elites rather than Jews as a group, while Jewish organizations, members of Congress and conservative institutions have publicly condemned specific remarks and guest choices [4] [2] [5].” What can Creator tell us about the reasons for this emerging behavior on his part?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
260 views0 answers0 votes
The Internet watchdog, factually.co-reported the following about Candace Owens making anti-Semitic statements to her followers: “Candace Owens has been repeatedly labeled anti-Semitic for a series of public comments and online posts that critics say recycle classic antisemitic tropes — including claims about Jewish control of media and finance, promotion of an antisemitic 19th century text, blood libel adjacencies, and conspiracy links between Jews and historical crimes — made across social media, livestreams, and her shows between 2022–2025 [1] [2] [3]. Those remarks prompted condemnations from Jewish advocacy groups, a break with some conservative institutions and allies, platform enforcement actions, and formal public backlash that frames the pattern as shifting from dog whistle rhetoric to more overt antisemitic conspiracy mongering [4] [5] [6].” What can Creator tell us about the reasons for this emerging behavior on her part?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
190 views0 answers0 votes
123…99Next »
Ask Question