DWQA Questions › Tag: symptom displacement
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A viewer asks: “My question is regarding my nose: I have always been insecure about it and have never truly felt comfortable with my face as a result, even though I know I am beautiful and others think so as well. I want to know if getting surgery such as rhinoplasty is bad and will it affect my karma? There are many good surgeons out there and many people I know who have had it done and are happy. But I am worried it will change my face and also worried about the karmic consequences.” What can we tell her?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
66 views0 answers0 votes
Can the use of Purewave electromagnetic pulse therapy to ease the symptoms of a karmic-caused physical malady, induce a karmic penalty like symptom displacement? If so, what is Creator’s perspective about how humans can choose wisely how they seek relief in the highest and best way?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
67 views0 answers0 votes
You have shared with us the high frequency (50%) of human maladies that exhibit symptom displacement when treated medically, because that covers up, and thwarts the Law of Karma delivering an effective consequence to the individual. So, a new complaint will appear that may well be diagnosed as a new chronic disorder. You have also told us that symptom displacement can occur with energy healing, although less frequently (10% of the time). That makes sense, as the beneficial effects are usually transient, unlike when symptoms (the karmic consequence) might be suppressed indefinitely by use of medication. But what about using the Lightworker Healing Protocol? Can there be symptom displacement that would cause situations as with this client, seeing a symptom pop up at a new location?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
101 views0 answers0 votes
When people seek medical treatment, which almost always provides just symptomatic relief that is not curative, what percent of the time might that backfire in thwarting the karmic forces giving rise to the illness, to cause a new and different problem experienced as symptom displacement?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
131 views0 answers0 votes
If symptom displacement happens, can that lead to a more serious and intractable malady, or will the Law of Karma ensure it is only something of comparable severity?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
133 views0 answers0 votes
Erickson treated a couple of patients with an affective (wholly psychological) writing disorder. Neither could write but could do any number of other complex hand tasks like using tools or knitting. He was unable to treat one of the patients, but with the other, he used hypnosis to “transfer” the handicap to the other non writing hand. This finally enabled this patient to resume writing successfully, but with the effect that the other hand would go numb, every time they went to write something. So while this is difficult to label a “healing,” it is a creative workaround to the problem and was a great help to the patient. What was really happening here, why was Erickson successful with one, but not the other patient, and what is truly needed to heal such disorders?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
146 views0 answers0 votes
Erickson mentioned a little-known phenomenon to folks who don’t work in extremely loud industrial settings. For old-timers in these settings, it is not uncommon for two acclimated workers to be able to carry on a “normal” conversation, at normal volume levels, when outsiders can’t hear each other even when shouting in close proximity. How is this even possible? This appears to be a phenomenon almost akin to telepathy. It certainly seems to defy our understanding of hearing biology. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
159 views0 answers0 votes
One reason that science appears to eschew hypnosis is because the phenomenon is not 100% reproducible on demand. There is no such thing as a hypnotic induction technique that will work with every subject, every time. Erickson found that even with well-experienced subjects, he would sometimes have to alter his induction approach because they had developed what he called a ‘mind-set’ or intimate awareness of it, such that it was no longer effective. This was especially a problem with highly intelligent subjects. Ordinary science appears to have no patience for any of this. It appears to be more “art” than “science.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
148 views0 answers0 votes
Erickson never believed that some people cannot be hypnotized, and spent his life attempting to prove that. One student, in particular, required over 300 one-hour working sessions before he could develop a somnambulistic trance. Once that was achieved, he turned out to be an outstanding subject. Erickson also noted that most engineers are difficult to hypnotize. Something peculiar about engineers seems to make them exceedingly impatient with anyone even attempting to hypnotize them. The result was that during many of his studies, it was always the engineers that would quit on him, often en masse. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
195 views0 answers0 votes
Karl began his healing career as a hypnotist. And it was certainly the mixed results he got with it that helped motivate him to explore subconscious healing beyond hypnosis—eventually resulting in the revelations of Empowered Prayer and The Lightworker Healing Protocol. Can Creator share with us the importance of that journey and its achievements?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
183 views0 answers0 votes