DWQA Questions › Tag: virology
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A practitioner asks: “In a recent channeling Creator has said that the divine can’t take viruses directly out of us because that would essentially amount to killing them, but that we can use physical measures such as antiviral supplements to get rid of viruses ourselves without accumulating karma from doing so. On the other hand, we have been told and know that Creator regularly removes viruses from food or beverages to be ingested if we use the daily prayers. I would like to understand why it seems to be possible for you to remove viruses from our food directly but not from our bodies? Isn’t it essentially the same as killing the viruses when removed from our food? What’s the difference? Is it because, in the case of food, the viruses haven’t come into contact with the consciousness of a host body yet and can therefore be removed more easily? Is it because they can be removed from food without killing them or something else entirely?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
68 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “It was a bit disappointing to find out that remote healing via the LHP seems to be rather limited when it comes to removing viruses directly. Creator has stated that more than 85% of all chronic illnesses are viral in origin, so that seems to be quite a limitation for what remote healing is able to achieve if one of the main culprits that is responsible for most illnesses seems to be off-limits, at least in a direct and immediate sense. The fact that we can take measures into our own hands and use antiviral supplements or other physical methods to free ourselves from these viruses is all well and good but there are still massive limits in place that will hinder our progress. What about our other lives, for example?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
58 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “So we may have been lucky enough to find out the truth about viruses and what to do against them in this life, thanks to Karl’s brilliant work, but what good is it if it comes to our many other lives where we don’t possess this knowledge, let alone the means to do anything about it? To me this seems like a rather big hole in the healing equation that needs to be addressed somehow. Is there any kind of “loophole” by which we could achieve more in this regard?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
52 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Could we, for example, ask via the LHP that whenever we take an antiviral supplement, for all the benefits it brings to be automatically applied to our other lives as well? Could we, by doing so, authorize the divine to do more for us through this and help to remove viruses more aggressively? Could we perhaps even ask for the same benefits to be applied to all other humans or beings in general whenever we take an antiviral supplement ourselves or apply another physical method that allows for more direct removal of viruses from our bodies? Or is there perhaps another method by which this could be achieved?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
63 views0 answers0 votes
Can the potential complexity of treating viruses as clients more like people, to better define dialog for the LHP and DSMR protocols needed to reckon with and negotiate a withdrawal as predators, be avoided by simply including “viruses and other predatory organisms infecting people” on the list of clients to be worked on with the protocols. That way, the entire protocols and all their requests could be utilized or adapted as needed by the divine realm to best address these sources of outside consciousness acting as a scourge, without our having to learn how to describe talking to such organisms to gain their cooperation. Would listing them along with the other types of beings to be worked on, bring all the power needed for the divine realm to do their utmost in dealing with chronic viruses and parasitic organisms?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
303 views0 answers0 votes
Is there more needed, to be added or changed, in the protocols to further strengthen their effectiveness in dealing with viruses and other similar scourges?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
266 views0 answers0 votes
I was reviewing a recently published virology text and saw their discussion of the continuing controversy about whether viruses, despite having some characteristics of life forms, are actually alive. They acknowledge this is an important question for biologists because “a universally accepted definition for life does not exist.” Science, of course, has no idea that viruses possess consciousness, and, indeed, the issue of whether consciousness is present in life forms other than human beings is seriously debated. And even human consciousness is dismissed by some prominent scientists as being just a secondary consequence of brain chemical and electrical activity and perhaps just a “lucky accident” of evolution, more a fluke than a driving force. Are these views really the reverse of reality? Is the existence and expression of consciousness a universal property that defines whether something is alive? Is fundamental “life force energy” coming from the higher spiritual plane, which gives the spark of life, a special form of consciousness?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
451 views0 answers0 votes
Are types of shingles virus responsible for Bell’s palsy, frozen shoulder, diabetic nerve pain, colitis, vaginal burning, TMJ, Lyme disease, and even misdiagnosed multiple sclerosis?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
563 views0 answers0 votes
Ask Question