DWQA Questions › Tag: Creator of All That IsFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesFenn, being Baptist, emphasized the importance of “being saved versus not being saved.” Yet in studying the replies of Jesus, nothing was really shared that seemed to endorse that outlook, while Jesus was careful not to disturb that belief or overtly contradict it. Can Creator share with us if there really is such a status, and if not, how did such a notion take root and why is it so quickly embraced and adhered to?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Divinely Inspired Messengers260 views0 answers0 votesFenn would also frequently ask his angel and Jesus to couch their messages and teachings to him in terms of “chapter and verse” of the Bible. Fenn apparently thought this was “right and proper” but never asked either his angel or Jesus about it. By confining them to “chapter and verse” it seems Fenn was limiting the range of divine response they could actually deliver and remain within the rules of engagement. What can Creator tell us about imposing such a limit on divine beings?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Divinely Inspired Messengers268 views0 answers0 votesFenn would emphasize the importance of worship as a precursor to many (but not all) of his spiritual encounters. Saint Faustina similarly often encountered Jesus during worship or “adoration” and even Steiner talked about cultivating a “devotional mindset” as a helpful, if not utterly necessary, component and practice of attaining “spiritual vision” or “being in the spirit” as Fenn would describe it. What can Creator tell us about the necessity or helpfulness of worship, and whether it’s for Creator’s benefit, or the seekers? Many fundamentalist Christians sincerely believe that a period of worship is a necessary precursor to prayers that “get answered” and don’t regard it as “optional.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Divinely Inspired Messengers285 views0 answers0 votesFenn’s books were fascinating but, like so many other spiritual treatises, failed in any attempt to really grapple with the problem of evil. There was, of course, no mention of extraterrestrials. Can it be assumed that is simply because he never asked? Can Creator tell us why Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol are the genuine means for dealing with this most important of issues that most still do not have any clue about, even many with profound spiritual gifts?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Divinely Inspired Messengers282 views0 answers0 votesDoes Creator have an ego?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Human Corruption338 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “Does our Creator go to the Universes of other Creators and vice versa? If not, why not? Are they not allowed to interfere or lend help if requested?”ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Creator405 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “Seeing as there are multiple Creators, is the problem of evil present in other creations that other Creators oversee, or is it unique to our Creator? If evil is allowed to exist, is it imperative that some level of evil always exist to teach other beings that require it as a problem that needs solving?”ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Creator453 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “As I have mentioned before, I struggle a bit with the clinical sort of tone of the answers. This is not meant as a criticism of you, but very often the Divine gives you compliments about your curiosity and being on track with your intuition, and so on, so how can others like me get some encouragement and validation from Creator? It always feels kind of weird when they say “your client” in the answers, and there’s no reference to being a beloved child, no encouragement that this is a good question and they are pleased with how we are doing or anything like that. It’s rare anyway. So if God is a God of love, then why don’t we hear it more in these channeled answers? I suppose this is kind of a philosophical point about what is valid love communication. Some people believe that in a loving relationship, you should be telling each other “I love you” frequently. On the other hand, what really counts is how they act and what they do to help each other and to demonstrate that love. Is it like that? You have also mentioned that the channelings come across in that way because that’s how you are, as a scientist, but it does seem there might be a double standard or playing of favorites going on. Anyway, I feel confused and let down about this, so if it’s important to me it might be helpful to others to hear Creator’s answer about it, too. It’s probably something a little bit off with my depth of character to have that need, I realize.” What can we tell him?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Creator371 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “Does Creator have a sense of humor? I kind of felt there was some humor in the John F. Kennedy channeling, which I listened to again recently, and he was really known for that. That said, if Creator is able to feel the lightness of being he/she/they say we should have, effectively, since there are no big problems, why not some humor and even some jokes?”ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Creator380 views0 answers0 votesCastaneda wrote: “The power that governs the destiny of all living beings is called the Eagle … The Eagle is devouring the awareness of all the creatures that, alive on Earth a moment before and now dead, have floated to the Eagle’s beak, like a ceaseless swarm of fireflies, to meet their owner, their reason for having had life … for awareness is the Eagle’s food.” This seems like an incomplete description of the Creator of All That Is. Accurate to a point, but missing the quality of love, and the desire on the part of Creator for partnership with his creations. This is further reflected in this passage: “The Eagle, that power that governs the destinies of all living things, reflects equally at once all those living things. There is no way, therefore, for man to pray to the Eagle, to ask favors, to hope for grace. The human part of the Eagle is too insignificant to move the whole.” As powerful as he was, was Don Juan missing the forest for the trees? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness271 views0 answers0 votesCastaneda wrote: Don Juan “said that there is nothing more dangerous than the evil fixation of the second attention (or evil mastery of the intuitive faculties). When warriors (or seekers/seers or shaman/sorcerers) learn to focus on the weak side of the second attention nothing can stand in their way. They become hunters of men, ghouls. Even if they are no longer alive, they can reach for their prey through time as if they were present here and now.” How big is the problem of dead evil sorcerers? Are these some of the human hybrid spirits that seem to have partnered with the fallen angelics? If they were particularly adept sorcerers when alive, might their powers even exceed that of some of the fallen angelics, similar in the way that Anunnaki spirits manage to control and repurpose the fallen angelics for evil aims?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness295 views0 answers0 votesCastaneda wrote: “… all archaeological ruins in Mexico, especially the pyramids, were harmful to modern man. He (Don Juan) depicted the pyramids as foreign expressions of thought and action. He said that every item, every design in them, was a calculated effort to record aspects of attention that were totally alien to us. For Don Juan, it was not only ruins of past cultures that held a dangerous element in them, anything which was the object of an obsessive concern had a harmful potential.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness341 views0 answers0 votesCastaneda wrote: “Your compulsion to possess and hold on to things is not unique, he (Don Juan) said. ‘Everyone who wants to follow the warrior’s path, the sorcerer’s way, has to rid himself of this fixation.’ My benefactor told me that there was a time when warriors did have material objects on which they placed their obsession. And that gave rise to the question of whose object would be more powerful, or the most powerful of them all. Remnants of those objects still remain in the world, the leftovers of that race for power.” For a tourist to pick up such an object found in ancient ruins and take it home, can be dangerous in the extreme. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness284 views0 answers0 votesCastaneda wrote that Don Juan said, “… the ultimate accomplishment of a warrior (seer, seeker, shaman) was joy.” Sounds like everyone’s after the same thing, the bliss of divine communion, divine partnership perhaps, with Creator and Creator’s infinite love? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness273 views0 answers0 votesCreator has said repeatedly, that life force energy flows from the divine realm to keep all of us alive at a bare minimum. Castaneda wrote that “Life force flows to us from the south, and leaves us flowing to the north.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness292 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola