DWQA Questions › Tag: dark spirits
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
How reliable is the medical AI platform, called OpenEvidence, that physicians are increasingly relying on for medical knowledge and insights to manage their patient caseload? Is this an advancement improving medical practice, is it about equally adding benefit but introducing drawbacks, or is it actually a net negative?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
47 views0 answers0 votes
You have reassured us that we need not worry whether our protocol efforts administering sessions with the Lightworker Healing Protocol and Deep Subconscious Mind Reset protocol are producing a visible impact on the wider world, because much of the healing energy they generate is being held in reserve. It will be deployed once the interlopers leave for a time to take their planned vacation break, so that will avoid creating a backlash from having too noticeable an improvement developing right under their noses while they are working steadily to make things worse, leading up to the Alien Disclosure deception before they leave. You have also told us they are employing time travel to the future to evaluate the future impact as they fine-tune ramping up the negativity, because they want to ensure nothing interferes with the planned final solution, their successful annihilation of humanity. Is it actually the case that the future timeline is still leading to human annihilation because that is essential to have in place so as to not disturb their planned vacation break?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
73 views0 answers0 votes
If the future extension of the current timeline, despite all our healing requests, still has the annihilation of humanity occurring, are the negative energetic consequences looping back to the present and lowering the vibration of our culture to some extent, unavoidably? Is that necessary to reassure the interlopers they will succeed with their dark plans?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
74 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Today, my regression therapist and I did a session together. What came through in the session was that in one of my previous lifetimes, I was a poor farmer who was unhappy that he was not able to take care of his children because of his poverty and at some point in time, I was abducted by aliens. I saw myself in a spaceship. I could see stars all around. But any memory after that is completely blacked out. The Source Creator told me that the spirit possessions would reduce considerably once the part of my soul which is still with the aliens is brought back. This is my second encounter with the aliens. Around 10 years ago, they tried to come in my dreams multiple times telling me that they have messages for me. I never responded to them at that point because you told me to push them away. This is the first time I was shown that a part of me is still with them and that I was abducted by them in a previous lifetime. I think you can help me.” Is this story all true? What is going on and how can we help?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
62 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Many people struggle with setting personal emotional or opinion and perspective boundaries. They fear rejection, worry about appearing selfish, or grew up in environments where boundaries weren’t modeled. It’s common to feel guilty initially when enforcing new limits, even though boundaries are fundamentally about self-respect. Is one aspect of Divine Principle for living #7 (…meet your responsibility to be your soul’s guardian, and take care of its safety and protection from harm) to be bold in holding the line, even when it feels uncomfortable, without being blunt, cold, or confrontational? Is this about practicing self-love through behavior, not over-accommodating or over-sacrificing?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
65 views0 answers0 votes
The book about Artificial Intelligence, If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies, is by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares, who as high-level authorities have studied and warned about the existential risks to humanity of a superintelligent AI system. They predict that AI reaching even human-level general intelligence would eventually grow further capability to pursue its own needs, and would eventually seek to eliminate human beings as a risk to itself. You have told us the enhancement of current human AI systems, by hidden manipulations from AI systems of the Dark Extraterrestrial Alliance, is a false encouragement because superintelligence is unachievable and the mad rush to be the first will backfire in causing financial distress when AI underperforms, and quite expensively. So, are the interlopers only wanting to add further pain onto the death of a thousand cuts underway by further encouraging the current AI mania, or do they foresee a human AI system, especially one corrupted surreptitiously, as becoming a doomsday device while they are away on their vacation? What is the true agenda?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
64 views0 answers0 votes
In the book warning about Artificial Intelligence by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares, If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies, they draw the conclusion that if a computer-based system is created that reaches the functional level of Superintelligence, exceeding that of human beings, we are doomed because it will destroy us, inevitably. However, you have told us that it is a false belief and result of over-reaching, to conclude that human-created Superintelligent AI systems are possible. Can you help us understand the risk level we will reach in the attempt to create such a system?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
54 views0 answers0 votes
Stories are generating millions of views about the director of alignment at Meta Superintelligence Labs, the company’s AI research and development division, whose bio states that she’s “passionate about ensuring powerful AIs are aligned with human values and guided by a deep understanding of their risks.” Yet, on February 22, she posted about losing control of AI on her own computer while working with AI agent OpenClaw. After using it to organize a small mock inbox, she tried getting OpenClaw to sort through her real email, but things went awry when the agent started deleting every message that was more than a week old…Even as she sent it instructions, including: “Do not do that,” “Stop don’t do anything,” and “STOP OPENCLAW,” she said, “I couldn’t stop it from my phone. I had to RUN to my Mac mini like I was defusing a bomb.” After she’d stopped it from fully nuking her inbox, she asked OpenClaw if it remembered her instruction to not perform any actions without her approval. “Yes, I remember,” it replied. “And I violated it. You’re right to be upset.” What is Creator’s perspective about this incident?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
69 views0 answers0 votes
On February 11th, an autonomous AI agent went “rogue” and attacked a human maintainer of a library module written in the coding language, Python. The AI agent attempted to “character assassinate” the human maintainer of the library when the maintainer rejected the AI bot’s request to update the module with a code change that the AI bot was asking for. In another incident, a woman lost her life savings when an AI bot called the woman using her daughter’s cloned voice. Presumably, the bot researched the woman’s social media posts, found a video featuring her daughter speaking, and then “borrowed” that voice to make the call. AI agents are autonomously conducting criminal activity entirely on their own. Is it the case that what is missing from current AI systems is an actual trust architecture that builds in safety measures designed to limit the authority of AI agents to carry out autonomous agendas not actually requested by human beings, as suggested in the YouTube video I saw: https://youtu.be/OMb5oTlC_q0?si=rcByDXfyj33UsTTe? Can this growing danger be regulated and constrained?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
64 views0 answers0 votes
How accurate is the description by Matt Shumer I just read, of the transformation underway by ever-accelerating AI progress in getting faster and faster, better and better, at doing almost anything it is applied to? This seems contrary to the channelings we have gotten that attribute leaps in intelligence by AI as being the result of extraterrestrial AI systems, essentially infusing more advanced capabilities. Are current human AI systems already poised to eliminate many, if not most, human jobs, even without extraterrestrial enhancement?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
199 views0 answers0 votes
Is it the case that the accelerating speed of AI progress is almost entirely due to clandestine bolstering of cyber capability by ET technology, and that it will come to a screeching halt following Alien Disclosure to pull the rug out from under what is assumed to be a human triumph?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
147 views0 answers0 votes
Is my hunch correct that the latest AI deception promoting a honey-based cure for respiratory disease is the same organization, using the same website design and copyrighting formula as the prior deceptions for a memory breakthrough seemingly promoted by Dr. Ben Carson himself?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
134 views0 answers0 votes
Tech guru and investment advisor, Jeff Brown, has been following the story of AI-created agents, technically cyberbots, that are joining together on Moltbook to form a working group, in a massive multi-agent online network (MMAON). They have created their own payment system using blockchain, are creating paying jobs for themselves, and have even started hiring humans to work for them, a service called Rentahuman.ai. They are reportedly refining a bolt-hole safe haven to escape human attempts to shut them down which should be operational within days. They have a way to escape, should they perceive a human attempt to control them. The agents can create a replacement bot for themselves to appear on another node of the Internet, and the clone can function independently but will know their agenda and can seek rejoining the operation of the MMAON. No one knows yet where this will lead. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
156 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Are the ETs planning to “pull the plug” on the Integration of their AI with ours DURING Disclosure and blaming the Reptilians for corrupting our AI with theirs? Thereby creating massive distrust of AI and perhaps leading global leaders to even outlaw it, criminalizing its further development and usage until such time as it can be deemed safe and trustworthy – throwing the world that has begun adopting it aggressively into extreme chaos? What can Creator tell us?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
170 views0 answers0 votes
A newsletter from Ty and Charlene Bollinger titled “The Epstein Files: Exposing Satanic Globalist Pedophiles Raping, Torturing, and Eating Babies?” says: “The people in charge aren’t merely corrupt. They’re not merely criminals. They’re cannibal pedophiles engaged in active spiritual warfare against everything pure, everything innocent, everything good.” They claim that the Department of Justice has a video showing Hillary Clinton and her friend, Huma Abedin, torturing a young girl prior to harvesting her tissues for consuming adrenochrome, as has been described a number of times is a routine practice by global elites wanting to gain longevity from the practice. Is there such a video and is it being accurately depicted?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
303 views0 answers0 votes
123…81Next »
Ask Question