DWQA Questions › Tag: divine inspiration
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A viewer asks: “I have a question regarding prayer when under almost constant harm, and regarding the inability to fully be in [touch with] my heart, given all the guidelines [cautioning] about ineffective prayer. Because it is extremely difficult to get in a desirable state under these conditions, and then, there are beliefs now that the prayer won’t be effective which compounds [the problem of] them being effective. What then?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 days ago • 
31 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “I have been doing protocols for someone that I recently met. She might become a future practitioner, but is struggling very hard at present to stay motivated to carry on with her life. From what she told me, despite the several sessions I did for her, she still hears a dark voice giving her negative ideas, though it has gotten quieter. Also she can see a dark entity sitting at her doorstep day and night. My protocol requests have also not been able to heal that entity enough for it to leave. May I ask Source Creator, am I doing things wrong, what do I need to work on/with more intent for her to be cleared?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 days ago • 
31 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Over the past few generations, psychology has quietly taken over many of the roles that traditional morality used to play. Instead of asking whether something is right or wrong, people now ask whether it’s healthy or unhealthy. Psychology becomes the new moral referee—judging behavior is frowned upon but diagnosing it is acceptable. Calling something “toxic” or “traumatic” now carries the same weight that “sinful” or “immoral” once did, just with updated vocabulary. So even though people still make strong moral claims, they frame them as concerns about well being, as if they’re offering care rather than judgment. Is this a subtle manipulation of thought and cultural norms?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
23 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Most moral theories start with action (“What should I do?”), but the author Iris Murdoch thinks right action depends on right vision. Murdoch thinks the biggest moral danger is the ego’s tendency to remake the world in its own image. Fantasies lead to rash action—when we are absorbed in our own imagined version of events, we act too quickly and without proper attention. It leads to selfish action, since fantasy centers the ego and blinds us to the reality of other people. Ultimately, fantasy results in action based on illusion, choices made in response to a world that exists only in our minds. How should people balance the need to take action while not perceiving accurately?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
17 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Recently, I had been studying the life and works of Jesus Christ. At one point during this time period, I received an outreach, a feeling of love followed by who I perceived to be Jesus who asked “Do you want to work for me?” I was a bit taken aback by the directness of the question and didn’t really respond. Was this in fact Jesus making this outreach? I do hunger for deeper divine connection in my life that is more “palatable” to my family but on the other hand I see many who talk Jesus through the eyes of “proper” doctrine which I feel can be a trap. Can Creator help me figure this out?” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
99 views0 answers0 votes
We have shared comments about the paper in JAMA blowing the whistle on medical dangers, in pointing out that the U.S. healthcare system was the third leading cause of death in America (Starfield, B. Is US health really the best in the world? JAMA 2000 284:483-5). Things continue to raise questions. I just saw a citation of an editorial by Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet, one of the world’s top medical journals, published in 2015 in which he says: “The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.” While this is largely focused on the pressures to publish because of the vested interests of researchers, as well as journal editors, is there a deeper reason that quality and integrity suffer?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
51 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “In his 1970s book, Medical Nemesis, Ivan Illich suggests medicine isn’t the primary reason people survive illness; sanitation, nutrition, and housing matter more. He goes on to say over-treatment and exaggeration of disease are widespread, that healthcare fosters dependency, and that illness is seen as unacceptable. Healthcare often operates less for the benefit of patients and more to serve political, social, or bureaucratic interests – public image, economic concerns, or voter approval over medical advice. His views jarred badly with me. Is it right to say, in 2026, that people avoid confronting mortality and that modern healthcare is more about socio-political optics than illnesses?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
58 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “An overlooked aspect of modern medicine is perhaps that now normal human experiences—such as minor stress, aging, ‘high’ blood pressure, ‘high’ cholesterol, or childbirth—are labeled as medical problems that require professional intervention. Society has arguably become increasingly dependent on doctors and healthcare institutions, losing confidence in self-care and mutual support. Medical institutions now dictate social norms, defining what is ‘normal’ or ‘deviant,’ and expanding their authority into everyday life. Is this intended to weaken society’s resilience, creating a population that depends on the medical system for a ‘pharmaceutical invasion’ and even the conception of who is ‘ill?'”
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
52 views0 answers0 votes
George Orwell said, “Within any important issue, there are always aspects no one wishes to discuss.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
41 views0 answers0 votes
The Buddha said, “In a controversy the instant we feel anger we have already ceased striving for the truth, and have begun striving for ourselves.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
47 views0 answers0 votes
Chauncy Depew said, “Follow the path of the unsafe, independent thinker. Expose your ideas to the dangers of controversy. Speak your mind and fear less the label of ‘crackpot’ than the stigma of conformity. And on issues that seem important to you, stand up and be counted at any cost.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
46 views0 answers0 votes
Andrew Young said, “There can be no democracy without truth. There can be no truth without controversy, there can be no change without freedom. Without freedom there can be no progress.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
38 views0 answers0 votes
Adam Driver said, “Any actor is happy to be involved with something that’s challenging, controversial, and not easily palatable. Things that are too dumbed down or easy to swallow are uninteresting… It’s good when people have such a polarizing response.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
38 views0 answers0 votes
Robert Redford said, “I’m not a lawyer, but I do know this: we need to protect our ability to tell controversial stories.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
36 views0 answers0 votes
Speaking of lawyers, when Brian was in law school, he participated in an exercise called “Moot Court.” The exercise consisted of arguing both sides of a controversial case. Many students really struggle with this exercise. For example, as a prosecuting attorney arguing for Charles Manson’s guilt, and then as a defense attorney arguing for his innocence. For many, many people, and even attorneys, that kind of mental flexibility is literally “asking too much.” What is Creator’s perspective on the appropriateness or inappropriateness of this exercise? And why is this such a struggle for so many?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
48 views0 answers0 votes
123…43Next »
Ask Question