DWQA Questions › Tag: divine wisdomFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesOne of the apparent attractions of atheism is that it is widely embraced by the smart, accomplished and savvy, while belief in the divine is portrayed as primitive, dumb, gullible, and the desperate clinging of people who can’t think for themselves and who are afraid of their own shadows. This is a VERY significant presumption to have to counter and dispel. Can Creator share the best strategy for countering this outlook most effectively?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs348 views0 answers0 votesCreator has shared that humans are divine, but that atheism leads inexorably to depravity. Most atheists have a kind of utopian outlook for atheism that itself is a kind of fairy tale that doesn’t hold water when examined critically. Showing them that all atheistic outlooks eventually lead to depravity on a gargantuan scale, has been found to be an effective, but not pleasant approach to “raining on their parade.” This seems contrary to the preferred divine means of spreading love through positive reinforcements and messaging. Can Creator comment on the importance of “telling it like it is?”ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs394 views0 answers0 votesThe reality and nature of consciousness is one of the central topics of contention when conversing with atheists. Most do not believe in the existence of non-local consciousness in any form. Yet Creator has shared that everything is consciousness in actuality, and the interlopers would seem to have an outlook on non-local consciousness that is not as strict as that embraced by human atheists. What is the difference in outlook if any? Do the interlopers view the universe as primarily “dead,” as opposed to the divine reality of it all being ALIVE? Creator shared that the alien outlook is that non-local consciousness is a kind of “echo” that is a reflection of consciousness, but not ACTUALLY consciousness? Can Creator clarify whether or how true that is?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs325 views0 answers0 votesIt has been observed, that for most human atheists, the REAL bone of contention, isn’t the existence or non-existence of God, but rather the rejection of a tyrannical, hypocritical, arbitrary and capricious God who they view as “no friend of theirs.” In some ways, it appears like an ironic rejection of the Extraterrestrial Alliance who in fact are the ones who actually behave this way. Yet, it’s God who suffers the rejection. Can Creator comment on this perspective of atheists?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs342 views0 answers0 votesIt’s a long conversation to bring an atheist to the point where a discussion on the relative power and promise of prayer can even begin to be discussed. Atheists seem to want to avoid this particular topic more than any other. Can Creator share any insights on why this appears to be the case?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs373 views0 answers0 votesHow do prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol help the atheist to come around to actual REALITY? The reality of the divine?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs377 views0 answers0 votesHow would you make a case defending the reality of the divine to a group of atheists?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs392 views0 answers0 votesA would-be good samaritan wants to help the homeless, who truly need assistance. He was not interested in providing money for booze and cigarettes. A woman on the street was shrieking “HELP ME! I’M HUNGRY!” Our would-be good samaritan offered to take her right then and there and buy her a sandwich. She declined and asked for money instead. He said, “no” and repeated his offer. This went back and forth for a couple rounds, but he stuck to his offer and refused to give her money. Suddenly she just “blew up” at him, swearing at him and telling him where to go (in so many words). Who was wrong here? Both of them perhaps?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Karma370 views0 answers0 votesThere was a career panhandler in a big midwestern city that would hold a cup at the same spot every day and say “Help the HomeLESS!” He’d been doing this for years – even decades. A fixture almost as much as the light post he leaned against. Turned out, he wasn’t truly homeless at all, and shared a rather expensive apartment with another career panhandler. When asked about the apparent hypocrisy, he said simply that he rented rather than owned, so he wasn’t really lying. The problem is this individual and his partner help to reinforce the impression that many if not most homeless were not in the dire straits they appear to be in. What is the divine perspective on this type of career?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Karma367 views0 answers0 votesA man was portrayed on a 60 Minutes television episode back in the 1980s, who would dress like a bum and drive to his favorite spot in his own newer car, park the car out of sight, and work a freeway entrance ramp. He was observed by a reporter to leave the spot every couple of hours to make a call at a payphone. He was approached and asked who he was calling. Turned out it was his stockbroker. He confessed he made approximately $60,000 a year panhandling (in the 1980s when $60,000 was an above-average income) and had a very successful investment portfolio. When challenged, he failed to see any moral dilemma in what he was doing, but in managing a successful stock portfolio, he was clearly capable of performing successfully in a more traditional occupation. What are the karmic implications of that man’s occupational choice?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Karma374 views0 answers0 votesThose wanting to be good samaritans would decline if they knew they were simply fattening someone’s portfolio and of course most panhandlers are truly homeless and in need of assistance. Yet the desire not to be taken advantage of is strong in most people and presents a genuine moral conflict for many. What advice can Creator give to those wanting to help the truly needy? When one gives to a beggar, does the REAL condition of the recipient have any bearing on the good karma earned by the donor?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Karma352 views0 answers0 votesA worker in a large city can run an obstacle course of multiple panhandlers twice a day going to and from the office. Many times both people will pretend not to recognize the other, which can reach heights of absurdity as this can go on for years. The career panhandlers are daily intruding on the privacy of the commuters who simply want to be left alone in peace and quiet but are constantly exposed to this twice a day for years. As no one with an average salary can possibly give to everyone asking them daily for handouts, what are the karmic implications of ignoring such recurring pleas? How can Creator help the simple commuter make a moral choice?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Karma360 views0 answers0 votes“Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.” When it comes to the homeless, are we collectively failing to teach them how to fish?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Karma350 views0 answers0 votesA century ago, it was mostly charities and churches that were looked to to provide help for those in need. Today many look to governments to provide help for the needy and many are failing to do an adequate job. Was having the governments step in to help a mixed motive undertaking? Was the goal to create further distance between the donors and the recipients?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Karma315 views0 answers0 votesWhat is Creator’s perspective on the welfare state?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Karma419 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola