DWQA Questions › Tag: empowered prayers
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
How does the peptide derivative of ACTH called Semax, compare with the nutraceutical formulations Focus IQ and Myco Max, from PrimalForce.net, in helping with memory loss?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
55 views0 answers0 votes
Can amyloidosis be caused by a chronic virus, and if so, in what percent of cases?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
48 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “High blood pressure is conventionally regarded as a health risk and that lowering it reduces risk, especially in moderate-to-severe systolic BP of 140-159 mmHg. Dr. Malcolm Kendrick author of Doctoring Data claims that cardiovascular risk increases more steeply after systolic BP reaches around 160-170 mmHg—well beyond the 140/90 threshold often used to diagnose and treat hypertension. A rule of thumb in medicine is that for older individuals, a systolic BP of around 100 + age is a reasonable upper limit beyond which cardiovascular risks increase significantly. Is hypertension over-treated, given that aggressively lowering blood pressure—especially in older individuals—can be harmful?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
73 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “A 2018 book, Medical Nihilism, by Jacob Stegenga claims the healthcare system over-adopts treatments and under-recognizes risks. He states confidence in the effectiveness of medical interventions should be low because empirical evidence for the efficacy of many treatments is weak due to methodological flaws, publication bias, the influence of commercial interests. He claims positive studies are more likely to be published, screening programs tend to detect and treat cancers that would never cause harm, common treatments can cause long-term complications, short trial durations miss long-term harms etc. How accurate is his view that evidence is systematically skewed and harms are undercounted?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
57 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Dr. Bernard Lown, a Harvard cardiologist in the 1980s, criticized the rapid rise of surgical Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts (CABG), noting 20–40% were potentially avoidable, especially in stable angina, and many patients had uncertain survival benefit. He advocated medical therapy—nitrates, beta-blockers, lifestyle changes—for symptom control. How accurate is it to say that in 2026, evidence-based guidelines and trials have reduced avoidable CABG to <10% for high-risk, guideline-selected patients, and that for low-risk, stable patients, surgery rarely improves survival, and that beta-blockers, nitrates, ACE inhibitors, lifestyle changes are to be preferred?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
49 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Creator, many Christian Pastors who are big into miracles are across the board stating that there is going to be a coming deception where aliens are going to claim being our saviors, only they are truly “demonic entities.” Is this prophetic warning close enough to the truth that it will benefit the Divine in helping people not side with darkness after the disclosure? Or will many Christians still be at risk of manipulation because of blind spots in this prophecy?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
101 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “There’s a lot of hype these days about the new peptide Semax for improving cognition. What are your thoughts as a scientist, as I am considering ordering this for increased memory loss? It seems this may be better than Advanced Memory Formula from Advanced Bio Nutritionals. My son’s friends are using this (in their 20s) and have raved about the instant mental alertness and memory performance in work and school.”
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
68 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “A 2012 paper in the British Medical Journal “Use of relative and absolute effect measures in reporting health inequalities” concluded that “75% (258/344) [of 2009 papers] reported only relative effect measures.” Absolute risk reduction is often far less impressive and less often stated. This suggests that physicians will overestimate the efficacy of treatments and patients may have a misplaced belief in both effectiveness and risks. To what extent does this practice mislead patients and clinicians and benefit pharmaceutical manufacturers?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
40 views0 answers0 votes
You have reassured us that we need not worry whether our protocol efforts administering sessions with the Lightworker Healing Protocol and Deep Subconscious Mind Reset protocol are producing a visible impact on the wider world, because much of the healing energy they generate is being held in reserve. It will be deployed once the interlopers leave for a time to take their planned vacation break, so that will avoid creating a backlash from having too noticeable an improvement developing right under their noses while they are working steadily to make things worse, leading up to the Alien Disclosure deception before they leave. You have also told us they are employing time travel to the future to evaluate the future impact as they fine-tune ramping up the negativity, because they want to ensure nothing interferes with the planned final solution, their successful annihilation of humanity. Is it actually the case that the future timeline is still leading to human annihilation because that is essential to have in place so as to not disturb their planned vacation break?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
80 views0 answers0 votes
If the future extension of the current timeline, despite all our healing requests, still has the annihilation of humanity occurring, are the negative energetic consequences looping back to the present and lowering the vibration of our culture to some extent, unavoidably? Is that necessary to reassure the interlopers they will succeed with their dark plans?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
79 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Dr. Malcolm Kendrick in his book, Doctoring Data, suggests more patients are harmed by over-treatment than helped. He claims published treatment benefits are often exaggerated by hiding behind relative risk (to mask how tiny most benefits are), selective reporting (such as statistical significance without meaningful benefit), or clever framing (such as natural variation in cholesterol or blood pressure) is medicalized as a treatable condition. To what extent is published medical research actually the fabricated appearance of scientific rigor to sell a product?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
52 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “What percentage of patients take drugs for almost no real benefit, even while risking side effects and penalized by the cost?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
53 views0 answers0 votes
A news release just stated: “President Donald Trump announced Thursday that he will direct his administration to begin releasing long-classified government files related to space aliens, unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), and UFOs—delivering on a promise that millions of Americans have been waiting decades to see fulfilled. The announcement, made via Truth Social, marks a potentially historic moment of transparency that previous administrations have been unwilling or unable to provide.” Is this a purposeful, carefully timed part of an orchestrated series of events building towards Alien Disclosure?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
78 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Are contact lenses generally safe, or are there inherent risks to be aware of? If there are risks, how can they be mitigated?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
153 views0 answers0 votes
Is the location of the first tidal power outage still the same as originally predicted, to be in the northeast US, enveloping New York and Washington D.C? What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
155 views0 answers0 votes
123…32Next »
Ask Question