DWQA Questions › Tag: extraterrestrial corruption of human institutions
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Is the 200 mg Pycnogenol with 40 mg PQQ, Premium French Maritime Pine Bark Extract from Vigorizar, sold on Amazon for $23.99 (30 servings), equal or superior to the benefits of Virasurge from Gold Leaf Nutritionals? The latter is described as having 1700 mg of a proprietary blend of L-Arginine HCl, Citrulline malate, Robuvit French Oak Extract (trunk), and Pycnogenol French Maritime Pine Extract (bark), and has 60 servings for $83.00 if 3 bottles are ordered. In addition to being more expensive, it is not clear if the Virasurge has at least the usual clinical dose of 150 mg of pycnogenol. Also, its other ingredients are particularly intended to support male sexual performance, but some men may be already taking other supplements with those ingredients and more; would adding the pycnogenol by taking the cheaper pycnogenol/PQQ supplement be a good option?
ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • 
28 views0 answers0 votes
Would the Pycnogenol/PQQ supplement from Vigorizar be a useful recommendation for vasculitis (blood vessel inflammation) in autoimmune conditions? What other conditions might benefit from its use? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • 
26 views0 answers0 votes
I am having trouble finding good scientific studies demonstrating effectiveness of topical absorption of EDTA in aqueous solutions, as some claim will work. Has this capability been covered up by interloper manipulation of research and publication of useful data? Does the recent communication I received about topical use of an aqueous EDTA solution call into question the Earther Academy topical chelation formulation? Will the latter deliver effective blood and tissue levels of EDTA, and are its other ingredients helpful for getting a wide-spectrum chelation for multiple hazardous substances? What is Creator’s highest truth?
ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • 
32 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “According to psychologist Laura L. Carstensen later-life couples often prioritize stability in their relationship over disagreement; they communicate gently and avoid overt conflict. They prioritize emotional closeness and positivity in interactions and tend to minimize negative exchanges. But this reduction in visible conflict can mean grievances and resentments are unresolved and can become a pattern of indefinite avoidance. When important concerns are unresolved, partners may feel unheard, isolated, or disconnected, even within long-standing relationships. Is this a wise recognition of time being finite and reaching for love or a shortcoming in addressing problems? Is talking enough?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • 
51 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Many families have a “conspiracy of silence,” where airing upsets is seen as disloyal. Men are expected to absorb pain and appear strong; women to maintain family harmony. This can lead to resentment, passive-aggression, emotional withdrawal, or illness. Fear of distress or abandonment often motivates a withdrawn silence. Talking about problems is the pop-psychology remedy but with dubious success as it often backfires. Perhaps changing the “conspiracy” seems to requires self-differentiation, boundaries, emotional regulation, and additional support before opening up. Is it wiser to build these qualities first, perhaps requesting divine support in doing so, before airing grievances?”
ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • 
36 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “‘You create your own reality’ has become a New Age mantra. It’s really though referring to a person’s inner experience, not an outside situation or circumstances. However, there do seem to be some leverage points on creating the inner experience and on intentional action. Perception depends on: what is selected for attention (based on threats, rewards, goal-relevant cues), questioning first impressions as final truth, moderation of strong emotional reactions (defensiveness, overreaction, etc.), cognitive appraisal (based on beliefs and past experiences), and then a story that integrates it all. To what extent can a person influence this process of constructing their inner reality for the better?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • 
41 views0 answers0 votes
A news outlet reported: “A series of fires and explosions at oil refineries and energy installations across multiple countries—including India, the United States, Australia, Mexico, and Ecuador—has sparked global concern, particularly as these incidents coincide with the ongoing Middle East conflict involving Iran.” Is this indeed a pattern of sabotage to further stress energy supplies? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • 
33 views0 answers0 votes
Jim Rickards wrote in an editorial on April 13, 2026: “Trump only has three options regarding the war in Iran. He can declare victory and go home. However, Iran could continue the war and would control the Strait of Hormuz. Energy prices would remain high. The second option is to keep bombing and wait for regime change in Iran. That’s also a losing strategy. It’s already clear there will not be regime change. The third course is escalation – exactly what Trump is doing. Iran recently announced they were setting up a toll booth at the Strait of Hormuz. Only Iran-approved vessels could transit. And those vessels had to pay a toll charge. The U.S. Navy won’t escort vessels through the Strait because the risk of losing a ship is too great. Instead, Trump is implementing his own naval blockade further out to sea. If a vessel makes it through the Strait (with Iranian permission), it and its oil will be seized by the U.S. Iran is acting like a Mafia extortionist. The U.S. Navy is acting like Caribbean pirates. Either way, no oil gets through. Get ready for $10 gas at the pump. Get ready for a global recession. And get ready for more escalation. It’s Trump’s only remaining card.” Is this a perceptive analysis and prediction of what the future holds, and is it being orchestrated by the Extraterrestrial Alliance?
ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • 
46 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Many people struggle with setting personal emotional or opinion and perspective boundaries. They fear rejection, worry about appearing selfish, or grew up in environments where boundaries weren’t modeled. It’s common to feel guilty initially when enforcing new limits, even though boundaries are fundamentally about self-respect. Is one aspect of Divine Principle for living #7 (…meet your responsibility to be your soul’s guardian, and take care of its safety and protection from harm) to be bold in holding the line, even when it feels uncomfortable, without being blunt, cold, or confrontational? Is this about practicing self-love through behavior, not over-accommodating or over-sacrificing?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
95 views0 answers0 votes
I just learned that US envoy Steve Witkoff recently discussed in a radio interview his experiences working alongside Jared Kushner during three failed negotiations with Iran, leading to the US attack on Iran with Operation Epic Fury. Witkoff reported to the President that it was clear Iran was being deceptive as well as unresponsive in rejecting all US demands for an end to their nuclear ambitions. Witkoff said they told him that despite the bombing done to destroy their underground nuclear facilities, Iran still possessed 22,000 pounds of enriched uranium, enough to make 11 nuclear weapons, and that it could be done in 10 days, and that 25 nuclear weapons could be assembled in 4-6 weeks. That appears to have been the last straw in making a decision that the US and Israel needed to strike Iran immediately and decisively. You have told us that the US will not win the war they started, and it is clear the pain inflicted will be massive. The Iranian handling of the negotiations seems not only defiant but deliberately provocative, even reckless. We understand that waging war is non-divine, but from a human perspective, expecting the US and Israel to remain passive with such a growing menace seems unrealistic. Was Iran bluffing, thinking the US would not choose to be the aggressor, or were they manipulated? What is most important for us to know about this horrible situation?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
105 views0 answers0 votes
The US has now attacked Iran in Operation Epic Fury. Military air campaigns have been used frequently in modern warfare. But their effectiveness in “winning” wars has been heavily debated. It has often been concluded that bombing and missile attacks, short of nuclear annihilation, can start wars but not end them. In fact, bombing campaigns, with their inevitable civilian casualties, serve to harden hearts and steel inner resolve to never give up and never give in. People will hate their attackers too much to surrender to them, and oftentimes, ground troops must be used to achieve and maintain a meaningful victory. In light of this past history, it seems naïve that the US will “win” in pummeling Iran from the air alone. What is Creator’s perspective about what will happen now?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
93 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer writes about a strange event he heard described in a group he contacts: “Going back to the Reptilian piece, I’ll describe an experience I had last year which didn’t freak me out but definitely showed me for real that these do exist and make themselves present at times. For one, we can now see those who are blatantly not of this world in their many forms and it is what it is, but this one was unique: I had a call to go and price a wall to plaster a lady’s living room fire breast wall. We agreed a price and date whilst I was there. She instantly picked up that my favorite bird was a Robin. She stopped the conversation to mention this. I thought how nice at the time. I’d been feeding them in the garden that morning and was still glowing from the interaction on arrival to this lady’s house. I find Robins communicate more thoroughly than many other birds so was still buzzing from my exchange with them. She was tall, about 70 years old in appearance, with lily-white hair and piercing green eyes. Whilst I was talking to her, explaining what the work would entail, I noticed she was replying without moving her lips—simple yeses and hmms as I was explaining. I first passed this off as my misinterpretation in the moment and I then prepared to leave. Once all was agreed, she shook my hand, and the palm of her hand felt like plastic to the point I had to look and see what the very different skin-to-skin feel was; it was like she was wearing a latex glove kind of feel; her hand was purple and brown with a sheen to it again. I noticed without it being obvious to her and assumed it’s her age and bruising. I then walked down her drive and got back in my van. She waved from the door and her hand was back to a normal color. I found this weird. Then knew instantly I had to take note and observe more tightly as these noticed signs were not just my imagination. The date soon came round to go do the work. I dropped her a text to confirm I was on my way and she replied with, “I’ll look forward to having you here,” and, “See you soon.” About an hour later I get to the property and there was a folded tea towel hanging from the letter box with a Robin stitched in the corner of it and a note stapled to it reading, “I handmade this for you,” and two kisses xx with her signature. I instantly thought, “Wow, the fun is beginning already!” Returning in observation, I knocked on the door and no answer. I then tried calling her phone to only get a dead line. I knocked a few more times until a neighbor eventually came out and said, “No one lives there, mate! No one’s been in that house for years.” This really took me back. I said, “I was here a couple weeks ago and had agreed to plaster for the owner.” He said, “Well, I don’t know about that but it’s definitely been empty for a good few years now.” When I looked up at the property from getting back in my van it clearly hadn’t been lived in for years, yet when I went to give a quote I met that lady and the house was well kept. I still have the tea towel today. Upon further inspection of the tea towel when I got home, the edging she stitched on was done in the fashion of a snake skin, purple and brown, much like the assumed bruising. Anyway, I tried calling and texting her again but her phone line was completely gone. I’ll never forget this. A couple weeks passed and she began to randomly pop up in my thoughts, replying to questions I was asking myself. She then one day came back into my mind asking if I am bothered by her presence, to which I said, “Yes, and do not consent to it.” She didn’t even reply; she just left my thoughts and that was the last of her.” Can you help us better understand this strange sequence of events and the true meaning of the experience?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
202 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Married couples often think, “If we just love each other more everything will work out.” Humanity, though, identifies specific sources of difficulties and solutions. Psychological approaches focus on personality traits, attachment styles, and emotional patterns. Sociological approaches focus on social structures, norms, and inequalities. Therapeutic approaches focus on communication, conflict resolution, and repair. Behavioral approaches focus on marriage as a set of changeable behaviors. Given the high levels of ignorance of the karmic causes of relationship troubles, and the weaknesses and variable effectiveness of the main approaches, how can “be more loving,” even the divine principles version, be enough?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
135 views0 answers0 votes
Talk of war with Iran is ramping up. Many are of the opinion that the U.S. taking military action to topple the Iranian regime leadership, specifically the Ayatollah, his family, and their inner circle, is a necessary step to further stabilize the Middle East and also free the Iranian people from tyranny. How likely is such a military step to take place and is this a necessary prelude to launching of the tidal power outages?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
168 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “According to ChatGPT, risks of topical chelation are minimal with small areas and short use but could lower calcium or magnesium if used extensively (EDTA binds calcium, magnesium, zinc, and iron, potentially lowering levels) and that rare but serious complications include mineral depletion, hypotension, fatigue, or strain on kidneys or liver. Would using low concentrations (1–5%), avoiding chelation if there are kidney, liver, or metabolic issues and limiting duration and frequency (e.g., once daily, 5–7 days per cycle), and limiting the treated area to a small area of the body (≤20–25% of surface), while taking a daily multivitamin/multimineral supplement be a sound safety protocol?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
118 views0 answers0 votes
123…36Next »
Ask Question