DWQA Questions › Tag: higher selfFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesIs there such an entity as “The Holy Spirit?” Or is it, in fact, more of a literary construct that loosely summarizes a large assortment of divine activities and agencies that would otherwise require much more explanation and discernment? Is the term “Holy Spirit” really a shorthand label for activities more accurately attributed to the higher selves, guides, and guardians of each and every individual rather than some mysterious and nebulous and nameless “Holy Spirit?” We know the connection between incarnated souls and their higher selves is compromised, but can such connections be healed and restored so long as there is sufficient human intention acquired from prayer? In this case, the intention would come not from each individual alone but from a vast pool of intention from millennia of individuals praying for divine intervention and deliverance. It’s not God’s will that brought all this about, but human will, and God and the divine realm were responding to that beseechment in a highly calculated and intentional way which, while miraculous in contrast to most living in that time, still fit within the Divine Rules of Engagement as it allowed skeptics to disbelieve. It should also be noted that most of the recipients of this so-called “gift” encountered great difficulty pursuing their missions, and while successful overall, often paid for it with unspeakably cruel punishments and death sentences. Many made every bit as much of a sacrifice and experienced every bit as much pain and hardship as Christ himself did. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 days ago • Divine Realm19 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “I will often watch a program about something and see someone that has passed over and have in mind to include that person in my next LHP-DSMR session. However, I sometimes can’t remember the person I had in mind for when I do a session, but do remember that there was someone I wanted to include. Can Creator still go back to that initial thought I had and include it as part of the session with my intention to want this person as part of my protocol session? I would have said yes, but perhaps this isn’t so?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 days ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol29 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Was the Prophet Jesus Christ really crucified? And if so, why? Why wasn’t he protected from the crucifixion? Also, I’ve heard of interpretations that the Prophet Jesus Christ was not crucified and, in fact, they crucified someone else who resembled him. I would like a clarification.” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 days ago • Religions33 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “How do we determine what kind of life is valuable?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 days ago • Human Potential29 views0 answers0 votesA news report states: “Nearly a dozen violent assailants equipped with tactical gear and weapons attacked U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Prairieland Detention Facility in Alvarado, Texas, on July 4, shooting a local law enforcement officer in the process.” Is this just a spontaneous choice of those assailants coming together because of shared political beliefs, or is there a deeper influence involved behind the growing attacks on this branch of law enforcement?ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • Problems in Society30 views0 answers0 votesSuccessful Hollywood Film Producer Paul Davids and Dr. Gary Schwartz of the University of Arizona, who has spent much of his career scientifically studying whether human consciousness survives death and if mediumship is authentic, have co-authored a 2016 book entitled An Atheist in Heaven. Paul Davids was good friends with the late Forrest J. Ackerman who is the subject atheist of the book. Forrest was known for saying he did not believe in life after death, but if it turned out he was wrong, he would “drop them a line.” It turns out Forrest (known to his friends as “Forry”) ended up dropping many lines to many people, as the book shares in great detail. One such incident was with a filmmaker from Canada who attended Forry’s memorial service. Afterwards, this filmmaker went to Forry’s crypt and knocked on the marble, saying out loud, “Uncle Forry, hi, it’s us, Michael and Ian, we’ve come to show our movie about you at the tribute for you.” They returned to their hotel room where Mike wanted to update a Facebook blog. This required a CAPTCHA code readable by humans but not computers. To Michael’s astonishment, the code that came up was “Ackerman000.” Michael felt this was a direct response to knocking on Forry’s crypt. A few moments later, Michael’s friend Ian blurted out, “Is he really dead?” The following sentence is verbatim from the book: “At that moment, the second phenomenon occurred, this time from Ian’s computer. A voice blurted out the words, ‘Oh my God, no way!'” Was Forry doing this? Was he in the light at the time, or still in limbo? And how does all this fit within the rules of engagement? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • Divine Realm63 views0 answers0 votesIn 2015, a séance was held in Forry’s former home, affectionately known as the “Ackermansion,” where Forry was a huge collector of Science Fiction memorabilia and essentially ran an informal museum of sorts when he lived there. Forrest Ackerman invented the term “Sci-fi” and was the founder and editor of the famous film genre magazine, Famous Monsters of Filmland, which was a huge favorite with teenagers in the late fifties and sixties. Steven Spielberg is counted among those who thought Forry was “pretty great.” He inspired an entire generation of famous filmmakers, authors, and special effects wizards. In that séance, it was asked what he (Forry) and other spirits were doing with their time. From the book, “What big project are they working on? Well, one must expend much energy to communicate with us (us incarnate humans that is), or to try to make their presence known, although the interest in communicating with us is substantial. So they, on the other side, are actively doing research, looking for ways to make communication between us and them easier and more efficient.” Were all the spirits attending that séance, including Forry Ackerman, still in limbo? For if they were in the light, they would know the rules of engagement, and that direct communication between spirits and humans was something strictly limited as it interferes with free will, and especially the free will of doubters to embrace their disbelief without overwhelming proof forcing the removal of all skepticism. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • Divine Realm48 views0 answers0 votesIn the book, An Atheist in Heaven, Paul Davids writes about interviewing “arch skeptic” Dr. Michael Shermer, executive director of The Skeptics Society, and founding publisher of Skeptic magazine. Dr. Gary Schwartz, in the same book, characterized Dr. Shermer as a “Type II skeptic.” He writes, “Sadly, there are individuals who claim to be ‘skeptics’ who are not open minded. They do not engage in careful questioning. They are not discerning in their evaluation of evidence. Though they may claim – often insistently – that they are undecided and seek the truth, in practice they are disbelievers or ‘unbelievers.’ They hold strong beliefs about what must be impossible. Furthermore, they often engage in irresponsible and unjustified evaluation of theories, methods, findings, and conclusions which challenge their convictions about what is possible in nature and the cosmos. This is pseudo-skepticism. I call this ‘Type II Skepticism.'” During his interview with Paul Davids, Dr. Michael Shermer certainly came off as a “Type II Skeptic.” However, later in the book, and just before it was published, Dr. Shermer ended up having his own very “mysterious” experience that he confessed “shook his skepticism.” He was getting married and his bride had an old transistor radio that belonged to her deceased grandfather that hadn’t worked in decades. New batteries didn’t help – the radio was dead. On their wedding day, his bride said she wanted to say something to him alone, so they went to the back of the house where they heard music playing in the bedroom. They opened a drawer and found her grandfather’s radio playing a romantic love song. Other family members reported the music started playing just as the wedding was to begin. The next day, the radio went silent and never worked again. Dr. Shermer’s bride was reportedly a skeptic as well, so how could this happen within the rules of engagement, especially since we know the divine realm will go to great lengths to protect the beliefs of skeptics? So much so that just the presence of James Randi, for example, could literally temporarily disable the intuitive abilities of those around him? What can Creator tell us about this radio at the wedding event and how it all fits within the rules of engagement? Was the bride’s grandfather still in limbo?ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • Divine Realm43 views0 answers0 votesDr. Gary Schwarz reported in the book, An Atheist in Heaven, that even after decades of research and seven books he wrote on the topic, he still struggled believing it all! He wrote, “In my case, being a well-trained skeptical thinker and well-educated disbeliever in the possibility of an afterlife, I had this strong, uncontrollable emotional reactive habit of automatically assuming that anyone who believed in life after death was naive, ignorant, stupid, brainwashed, prejudiced, delusional and/or crazy. This emotional reaction was clearly inconsistent with the emerging theory … and research. I experienced increasing conflict between what the emerging theory and research were teaching me versus my growing fear that if I accepted the theory and research, that maybe I was becoming ‘brainwashed’ by the theory and evidence, and I was even ‘losing my mind.’ I came to realize that I was like one of Pavlov’s classically conditioned dogs who automatically salivated to the sound of a bell. Dogs do not automatically salivate when they hear a bell ringing, and neither do we.” This confession by Dr. Schwartz is both revealing and disturbing. How could it possibly be that decades of research and validation could not successfully alter his emotions? How could he still harbor fear? Is all Type II Skepticism ultimately a FEAR reaction? Was the origin of Dr. Schwartz’s inexplicable emotions, even after decades, wholly originating with his deep subconscious? If so, it certainly reinforces Creator’s assertions that there is little short of divine intervention, via the Lightworker Healing Protocol and Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, that we can do to alter beliefs in the deep subconscious. What can Creator tell us about Dr. Schwartz’s struggle, and what lessons can we draw from it?ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • Divine Realm16 views0 answers0 votesDr. Gary Schwartz provided another deeply mysterious observation about himself in the book. He wrote, “It is now Alice in Wonderland time. For many people, it is having … direct personal experiences which leads us to change our minds. However, if a phenomenon is novel, challenging, and especially if it is ‘seemingly unbelievable,’ then having a direct personal experience with the phenomenon is often essential. And for certain phenomena, there is no substitute for experiencing it ourselves. … What I have discovered is that the more unbelievable events are replicated, the greater the level of disbelief one may experience. Often the so-called boggle factor does not decrease with replication, it actually increases. This increased disbelief is not rational; it is emotional. Replication and validation are cornerstones of the scientific method. On the one hand, with each replication we are more convinced that the phenomenon is real, and yet simultaneously the phenomenon feels more unbelievable and seemingly impossible. If any single ‘formally physical person’ illustrates this emotional boggle factor, it is Forry. As the empirical evidence accumulated, the case for Forry being alive and well became stronger and stronger, and yet simultaneously the evidence became more and more difficult to believe.” What is Creator’s perspective on this dilemma and conundrum?ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • Divine Realm33 views0 answers0 votesThe rules of engagement are certainly there for a reason. But also, arguably, they can be one of the biggest obstacles there is for creating critically needed change in this world. As Creator has said repeatedly, saving humanity is a “Divine Level Problem.” Can Creator tell us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are the tools we need to both work within the rules of engagement but also overcome the obstacles they represent at the same time?ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • Divine Realm43 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “I had a few recent dreams of experiencing a power outage and watching on TV a young man smiling and then seeing the pupils of his eyes turn from round into vertical like a reptile. There was no subtlety about it. This coincided with my daughter on a camping trip with her boyfriend encountering a garter snake while trying to sleep. It disturbed her greatly as you can imagine. What was the significance of these events? Was this to help prepare me for the coming events somehow?”ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • Non-Local Consciousness58 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Can we augment sleep so that we can get more rest with less sleep? Especially useful with recent amplified targeting against sleep and rest to fatigue people out.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 6 days ago • Non-Local Consciousness75 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “Would it be helpful to pray to you, Creator, to not only replace all self-limiting beliefs but to be open to and be inspired by beliefs that are positive, powerful, and the most helpful in fostering our highest alignment with Creator in the safest and quickest way for all levels of the mind? Or would this be an addition we could make to the LHP if we are interested in that for ourselves? How can we cultivate beliefs that are shaped and constructed by higher truth to serve us? What can Source Creator share with us regarding guiding the improvement of our beliefs?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 6 days ago • Limiting Beliefs25 views0 answers0 votesWill a request to one’s higher self or spirit guide be shielded from outside observation and interference, just as when one prays to God?ClosedNicola asked 7 days ago • Prayer53 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola