DWQA Questions › Tag: human subjugation
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A viewer asks: “Creator has told us that the Anunnaki don’t believe in God, but they do impersonate the future extensions of Reptilians, [who call themselves] the “Pleiadians,” and one would assume are aware of them. What do they think of the Pleiadians’ warnings? Are they familiar with the concept of future extensions?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
44 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Is the Brilliant Light Power “SunCell” and the “Hydrino Theory” a true discovery of a new energy source to power our electrical grid and more?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
52 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Is the hydrino, the dark matter, and its interactions the source of dark energy that scientists are looking for?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
41 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Is the hydrino source of energy important for our survival and Gaia’s benefit once the interlopers withdraw?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
36 views0 answers0 votes
In 2001, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) launched a trial to lower blood glucose levels in diabetic patients to reduce their risk for heart attack, stroke, or death from cardiovascular disease. The trial, called Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes, or ACCORD, involved over 10,000 Type 2 diabetic patients who had either been previously diagnosed with heart disease or had two or more risk factors for heart disease when they entered the study. Half received standard treatment and half were treated aggressively with higher doses of antidiabetic drugs. The trial was halted 18 months early because of a 26% increase in deaths in the aggressively treated group. The NIH said there was no conclusive link to a particular medication. Were these outcomes just a fluke or was over-medication involved? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
19 views0 answers0 votes
The diabetes drug rosiglitazone, sold under the trade name Avandia, has come under scrutiny. From 1999 to 2009, nearly 50,000 people on Avandia suffered heart attack, stroke, heart failure or death. In Europe, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) recommended in September 2010 that the drug be suspended because the benefits no longer outweighed the risks.[10][11] It was withdrawn from the market in the UK, Spain and India in 2010,[12] and in New Zealand and South Africa in 2011. It is still being prescribed in the U.S. following a review of safety data by the FDA. Is this drug safe to use or are there cardiovascular risks? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
20 views0 answers0 votes
Are clinical studies in less prominent foreign scientific journals more likely to be reliable than what is reported in major U.S. journals, due to less interloper interference with the studies or their interpretation?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
17 views0 answers0 votes
Was use of the term “progressive” instead of “liberal,” promoted through mind control manipulation by the Extraterrestrial Alliance as a form of propaganda to make people believe that change represents desirable progress, always, when such is not the case? Doesn’t this condition us to overturn the past, even to abandon things that work?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
26 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “A man in the pest control business said that he had gotten several calls from different people in the past week about bats in their homes. He seemed perplexed by this phenomenon since bats in this climate should be hibernating through the winter. Additionally, I’ve seen multiple insects and it is barely February and still very cold. Is there something confusing these animals? If so, what? Is this related to the time reset, like some kind of animal Mandela effect? Or is it just a fluke?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
23 views0 answers0 votes
How much of the power of persuasion is a product of divinely bestowed soul attributes, versus a learned skill that one acquires through trial and error over many lifetimes? If a learned skill, how is that skill transferred from lifetime to lifetime? Is it recorded in the akashic records and made part of cellular memory during the fetus’s formation? Or is it something wholly spiritual in nature, retained by the spirit itself, and if one learns the power of persuasion while incarnated, are their newly discovered persuasive powers on display in the light between lives as genuine learning? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
85 views0 answers0 votes
Persuasion is the power to effect CHANGE or perhaps prevent change. And even though there is a distinction made between persuasion and compulsion, the threat of compulsion can, in and of itself, be HIGHLY persuasive. The iconic fire and brimstone sermons delivered with great theatrics by eloquent ministers comes to mind. A “fear monger” or one who “peddles fear” also comes to mind. What is Creator’s perspective of persuasion AS compulsion?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
127 views0 answers0 votes
It’s interesting to note that the iconic “snake oil salesman” never had a storefront, like a pharmacy, but instead pulled into the town square with his wagon and hawked his magical products directly to the crowds, and then often “hightailed it” to the next town before the truth of his products became more widely known. Google defined snake oil salesmen as those who deceived people in order to get money from them. The successful ones were highly persuasive people. When one has such ability, it seems so puzzling that such a person could not find a “legitimate” avenue in which to practice those skills and be successful without all the ignominy. Good salespeople are in demand everywhere and for everything—why resort to fraud? What can Creator tell us about exploiting the masterful use of persuasion to willfully engage in fraud?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
108 views0 answers0 votes
When one does a study of some of the most effective salespeople, one often encounters a mixed bag of ethically questionable tactics. One extremely successful car salesman would sit down with a phone book, call people and tell them their new car was ready for pickup. When people inevitably said, “I didn’t order a car,” he would profusely apologize and then immediately segue into asking them if they were at all in the market for a new car. With this approach, he made a fortune and set the world record at the time for most non-fleet sales made by a car salesman “one customer at a time.” Now to his credit, he was extremely likable, attentive, thorough, and did great customer service, sent birthday cards to his customers, etc. Nevertheless, a lot of his success was predicated on a lie and deception. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
72 views0 answers0 votes
In reference to the above car salesman’s success, he was successful because he was good at “cold calling” which most people have a deep aversion to. Cold calling is one of the most obvious breaches of the “Golden Rule” there is. Almost everyone HATES getting cold calls, and yet most successful salespeople will assert that you need to do it in order to be successful. Brian remembers one “boiler room” telephone canvasser who bragged how she abused anyone cold calling her but had no problem doing cold calling for a living. The stark hypocrisy was dramatic and utterly remorseless and unapologetic. She literally thought it was “hilarious” and laughed about it. Brian found it disturbing, to say the least. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
95 views0 answers0 votes
Cold calling works precisely because so many people have an aversion to doing it. That alone makes it a successful strategy for those who can bring themselves to do it. Brian did sales in the late 80s and struggled with this dilemma. A rule of thumb is it takes 10 calls to get a lead, 10 leads to get an appointment, and 10 appointments to get a sale. Brian demonstrated to himself that, indeed, the formula works and managed to get a house listing as a result. But rather than being encouraged by his success, he was so overcome with guilt about disturbing people eating dinner that he eventually abandoned sales as a career altogether. Cold calling cannot work if everyone does it. Everyone’s phone would ring all day long and it would be utterly chaotic and untenable. There is the idea that, if “everyone” can’t, then maybe no one “should?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
141 views0 answers0 votes
123…31Next »
Ask Question