DWQA Questions › Tag: prisons
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A viewers asks about the recent channeling discussing apparent anti-Semitism programming befalling popular conservative commentators Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens: “… There is a lot of evidence produced not only by these commentators but many others as well, as to the nefarious deeds and deceptions done by Zionists and the military industrial complex types. I have no doubt the ‘Jews’ are being made to be the obvious villains by most, if not all of the world, and this is indeed by design IMO. But maybe pointing out how the Jewish people themselves have been manipulated for centuries by the interlopers to perform deceptions and misdeeds to their neighbors to eventually help create this narrative of popular opinion turning against them, would go a long way to reveal the overall deception here, and that NO group is innocent or free from manipulation from our space-faring puppeteers. I have no desire to point any fingers at the Jewish people in any way, but I think it is important to see that they too are having their strings pulled. Maybe even more so than most. I can only imagine the enemies they made by not only spawning Moses, but also Jesus Christ himself. So they may very well be at the top of the ET’s hit list.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • 
62 views0 answers0 votes
I have been agonizing over the issue some Get Wisdom followers have raised in their concerns about me seeming to have a pro-Israeli bias, simply for asking about the strange anti-Israel and anti-Semitic shift in perspectives by Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens which others have pointed out. And they want me to present more criticisms of the war in Gaza. It seems to me that, as usual, the Jews are a tiny minority once again being criticized by most of the world. I am reluctant to pile on condemnation of the Israeli war on Gaza without detailing the brutality of their provocation by Hamas in orchestrating the October 7, 2023 slaughter of about 1,200 Israeli civilians—men, women and children—not to mention, kidnapping and years-long torture of about 240 hostages taken back to Gaza and imprisoned. Now that the “Civil Commission Report on Oct 7th Crimes by Hamas Against Women and Children” has been issued, the current lopsided anti-Israeli sentiment seems to cry out for Israeli support. What is the best way for me to handle these conflicting needs in serving Get Wisdom and the Cause of the Divine? I don’t want to stir a hornet’s nest that only causes more damage.
ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • 
77 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Mobility data from cars and cellphones behaves like a fingerprint. The real danger isn’t collection of data by manufacturers—it’s what happens when that data is reused, combined, and reinterpreted later. The data can reveal: home/work locations, socioeconomic status, social relationships, etc. This secondary use turns mobility data into a long-term control tool because its meaning and power expand every time it is resold. People might avoid certain places, limit their movements, self-censor activities or purchases, etc. This creates a voluntary limit to movement, liberty, and association. Is this the intended purpose, or is the data fed into ET AI systems for better control?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • 
38 views0 answers0 votes
Is the Internet watchdog, factually.co, a trustworthy, reliable source of politically and ideologically independent research and reporting about people and events which are controversial? How corrupted might it be by the interlopers?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
236 views0 answers0 votes
The Internet watchdog, factually.co, reported the following about commentator Tucker Carlson making antisemitic statements to his followers: “Tucker Carlson has been repeatedly accused of antisemitism for a series of public statements and interviews spanning at least 2023–2025, including demeaning descriptions of Jewish individuals, platforming Holocaust minimizers and extremists, and promoting tropes about Jewish power and “replacement” that many groups label antisemitic [1] [2] [3]. Carlson and some defenders deny he is antisemitic, arguing he is critiquing Israel or elites rather than Jews as a group, while Jewish organizations, members of Congress and conservative institutions have publicly condemned specific remarks and guest choices [4] [2] [5].” What can Creator tell us about the reasons for this emerging behavior on his part?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
301 views0 answers0 votes
The Internet watchdog, factually.co-reported the following about Candace Owens making anti-Semitic statements to her followers: “Candace Owens has been repeatedly labeled anti-Semitic for a series of public comments and online posts that critics say recycle classic antisemitic tropes — including claims about Jewish control of media and finance, promotion of an antisemitic 19th century text, blood libel adjacencies, and conspiracy links between Jews and historical crimes — made across social media, livestreams, and her shows between 2022–2025 [1] [2] [3]. Those remarks prompted condemnations from Jewish advocacy groups, a break with some conservative institutions and allies, platform enforcement actions, and formal public backlash that frames the pattern as shifting from dog whistle rhetoric to more overt antisemitic conspiracy mongering [4] [5] [6].” What can Creator tell us about the reasons for this emerging behavior on her part?
ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • 
222 views0 answers0 votes
Human beings are social creatures. Being accepted by the people you respect is important for nearly everybody. Solitary confinement is widely regarded as one of the worst forms of punishment there is. Can Creator comment on this human need for acceptance, and how that works as a powerful, if not overwhelming, need to be part of a consensus?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
777 views0 answers0 votes
Do the interlopers consider this need for peer acceptance a weakness?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
721 views0 answers0 votes
People don’t have a need to simply be part of a consensus, but to be part of the “right” or “correct” consensus. A friend of a GetWisdom founder confessed recently that the recent election of a particularly controversial politician was one of the most stressful things that ever happened to him. This seems an extraordinary thing for a man in his mid-fifties to confess. Clearly, he wants to be a member of the “right” consensus, but when politics is split almost evenly down the middle, determining which consensus is the “correct” one, is no longer obvious. Is this an accurate way to try and understand his dilemma and angst?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
686 views0 answers0 votes
How much does past life trauma stemming from being a member of the wrong consensus, play into people’s current perceived need to be in the “right” one today? The right one being the “safest” one, perhaps?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
600 views0 answers0 votes
One of the most maddening things for independent thinkers to put up with is the widespread tendency for people to first vet the source of recommended information before deciding whether they will even look at the new information or not. This can get downright comical when people will refuse to click on a link to a “questionable” website, that is in fact a link to a story on another site they actually approve of, or appears to support something they believe. Can Creator share why this seems like “enlightened” behavior to these people?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
523 views0 answers0 votes
Airplane pilots need to know which way the wind is blowing before attempting a takeoff. To do this, they will lick their finger and stick it into the air. This same kind of “check,” to see which way the “right consensus” is thinking, is observed almost everywhere. Another analogy would be to think of people walking around with a mini satellite dish on their head, that is connected 24-7 to their consensus database, like social media or a particular news outlet, so they’re never confused about what is “safe” information and what is “dangerous” information? What is Creator’s perspective of these analogies?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
700 views0 answers0 votes
It has been observed that many people genuinely fear information that has been deemed by their consensus to be dangerous, to the extent that they risk exile and banishment (or worse) if they even reveal that they know something they shouldn’t. Not unlike discovering that the car you’re driving is a stolen one, or that you are a carrier of a deadly virus. But the dilemma is, once you are exposed to information, it is very difficult to unsee it, and so people go to great lengths to avoid being exposed if they can help it. This creates some remarkable “gymnastics” at times. Can Creator comment?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
663 views0 answers0 votes
Placing one’s full allegiance with a consensus, and making consensus approval their top criterion for conducting their lives means that consensus acceptance can be more important than facts or truth—to the extreme extent of people not believing their own eyes, or ignoring fundamental standards of fairness and decency they learned at age five. Can Creator share the karmic hazards of living this way?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
709 views0 answers0 votes
It would seem that one of the core operating principles of effective mind control manipulation is to win people’s obedience to a consensus, by simply controlling the content of that consensus. Controlling the content of a consensus can frequently be done with simple, repeated propaganda. And yet, so few people seem to recognize just how easily a consensus can be socially engineered and manipulated. They are certainly made aware this happens, especially when it’s pointed out to them in an obvious way. Yet they continue to resist. How much stress does shutting out this awareness cause, and how damaging can it be?
ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • 
754 views0 answers0 votes
12Next »
Ask Question